What just happened to the stock market?!

The forum for general posting. Come join the madness. :)
Message
Author
User avatar
silvercamaro
Dog's Best Friend
Posts: 9608
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:45 am

#26 Post by silvercamaro » Mon Sep 29, 2008 2:39 pm

I think the people who will be harmed the most (in the short run, anyway) will be those relative few who scheduled their retirements, largely comprised of 401K plans, for Sept. 30.

User avatar
earendel
Posts: 13880
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:25 am
Location: mired in the bureaucracy

#27 Post by earendel » Mon Sep 29, 2008 2:42 pm

Timsterino wrote:
PlacentiaSoccerMom wrote:I haven't checked our investments in a while. I just don't want to know. The way that I look at it, we are buying low and it's going to rebound that's how I keep my sanity.
Same here. Yikes is all I am thinking right now. I am just glad I am 36 and not 56 right now.
I AM 56 and I'm not going to panic - yet.
Last edited by earendel on Mon Sep 29, 2008 2:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Elen sila lumenn omentielvo...A star shines on the hour of our meeting."

User avatar
silverscreenselect
Posts: 24609
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
Contact:

#28 Post by silverscreenselect » Mon Sep 29, 2008 2:42 pm

Bob Juch wrote: Are there any Democrats you like besides Hillary?

Maybe you two should go off and start your own party,
On the issues, I generally agree with Pelosi and Reid. As leaders, however, they are abysmal failures, which has contributed to Congress' sub-Bush approval numbers.

They came into office with a clear mandate from the public to end the Iraq war. Instead, they let Mr. 28% and the Republicans out-maneuver them time after time.

They got the minimum wage raised, and that is their only real accomplishment in two years.

Leadership means leading. It means if you say legislation is critical, getting it passed. It's not the responsibility of the Republicans to give the Democrats 100 votes or 65 votes or one single vote. It was Reid and Pelosi's responsibility to either find a way to ram a vote home on a strict party line (which, as usual, they lacked the cojones to attempt) or reach out to the Republicans. Instead, they chose to bash Bush and McCain and turn their version of the bill into a testimonial for Barack Obama. Their mixture of arrogance and spinelessness is staggering.

You can be a fan of a football team and still criticize its coach or ask for his firing if he's lousy. The Democratic party, at a time when voters are ready to turn to them, has shown an abject failure of leadership.

User avatar
MarleysGh0st
Posts: 27966
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:55 am
Location: Elsewhere

#29 Post by MarleysGh0st » Mon Sep 29, 2008 2:50 pm

silvercamaro wrote:I think the people who will be harmed the most (in the short run, anyway) will be those relative few who scheduled their retirements, largely comprised of 401K plans, for Sept. 30.
The security of one's retirement doesn't depend on the level of the stock market on the day one retires; this affects everyone, including those who've already retired and those who are hoping to do so at some future date.



And speaking for my index-fund portfolio: OUCH!

User avatar
silverscreenselect
Posts: 24609
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
Contact:

#30 Post by silverscreenselect » Mon Sep 29, 2008 2:56 pm

JBillyGirl wrote:It does sound like Pelosi went overboard in giving her speech a partisan edge. (Talk about exactly the wrong time to do something like that.) However, I have no sympathy whatsoever for the Republicans who were going to vote for the bill but then changed their minds after her speech. You should vote on a bill based on its merits (or lack thereof), not because you didn't like something someone said. Especially now that the stakes are so high.
There is something to be said about negotiating in good faith. If two parties feel they have to come to an agreement and one of them indicates that they absolutely can't concede any more and that this is going to be the best agreement the other side will get, the other side may go along, even if they feel it is a bad or ill-advised deal, as long as they feel the other side is dealing with them in good faith. I don't know what Pelosi/Reid/Frank et al said during their negotiations, but it's a safe bet that the more the Democrats tried to make political hay out of the issue, the less faith the Republicans had in their good intentions about the whole affair.

If Bush had given a speech on the eve of the Iraq war vote saying that the vote was necessary because the Clinton administration had failed to deal with Saddam and the terrorists during the last eight years, would it have passed nearly as easily (or even at all)? Not even Bush was that stupid. Nancy Pelois was.

It's one thing to put aside your misgivings about the bill and vote for it, hoping for the best, if you feel that the other side is doing the same thing. It's another thing to do it if you feel they are orchestrating the entire proceedings to win an election.

User avatar
silvercamaro
Dog's Best Friend
Posts: 9608
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:45 am

#31 Post by silvercamaro » Mon Sep 29, 2008 3:01 pm

MarleysGh0st wrote:
The security of one's retirement doesn't depend on the level of the stock market on the day one retires; this affects everyone, including those who've already retired and those who are hoping to do so at some future date.

And speaking for my index-fund portfolio: OUCH!
Okay. I was thinking of the kind of program with which I am most familiar, the stock portion of TIAA-CREF, which is prevalent in higher education. The the value of the CREF fund (the stock portion) is converted into an annuity on the selected day.

I did not convert my CREF when I retired, thinking that it would serve as some protection against inflation over the next few years, so it continues to be tied to the stock market. Today it's not worth as much as it was yesterday, so maybe I'll just let it sit a decade or so longer than I intended, hoping that it still may recover and eventually grow beyond pre-nonbailout levels. At any rate, that's my plan as long as I can get by without it. Fortunately, that's not my sole source of retirement income.

I still believe the stock market will recover. Eventually.

User avatar
MarleysGh0st
Posts: 27966
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:55 am
Location: Elsewhere

#32 Post by MarleysGh0st » Mon Sep 29, 2008 3:02 pm

There's plenty of bad faith to go around, SSS. :|

User avatar
Rexer25
It's all his fault. That'll be $10.
Posts: 2899
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:57 am
Location: Just this side of nowhere

#33 Post by Rexer25 » Mon Sep 29, 2008 3:04 pm

silverscreenselect wrote: If McCain becomes president, Hillary will very likely become Majority Leader and the level of competence and maturity in both those positions will increase tremendously.
SSS, I will understand if you ignore my question, but what have you heard that about the Senate majority leader position? Is Reid so unpopular with the Senate Dems that they won't vote for him? Is Hillary counting votes?
Enough already. It's my fault! Get over it!

That'll be $10, please.

User avatar
Bob Juch
Posts: 27106
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
Contact:

#34 Post by Bob Juch » Mon Sep 29, 2008 3:06 pm

JBillyGirl wrote:It does sound like Pelosi went overboard in giving her speech a partisan edge. (Talk about exactly the wrong time to do something like that.) However, I have no sympathy whatsoever for the Republicans who were going to vote for the bill but then changed their minds after her speech. You should vote on a bill based on its merits (or lack thereof), not because you didn't like something someone said. Especially now that the stakes are so high.
Barney Frank just said the same thing.

The news said calls, emails and faxes were running 30 to 1 against the bill. Mine were one each of those against.
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)

Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.

Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.

User avatar
Bob Juch
Posts: 27106
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
Contact:

#35 Post by Bob Juch » Mon Sep 29, 2008 3:09 pm

silverscreenselect wrote:You can be a fan of a football team and still criticize its coach or ask for his firing if he's lousy. The Democratic party, at a time when voters are ready to turn to them, has shown an abject failure of leadership.
Yeah, that's UCLA this year. I'm sure as hell not rooting for USC though!
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)

Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.

Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.

User avatar
silverscreenselect
Posts: 24609
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
Contact:

#36 Post by silverscreenselect » Mon Sep 29, 2008 3:13 pm

Rexer25 wrote:
silverscreenselect wrote: If McCain becomes president, Hillary will very likely become Majority Leader and the level of competence and maturity in both those positions will increase tremendously.
SSS, I will understand if you ignore my question, but what have you heard that about the Senate majority leader position? Is Reid so unpopular with the Senate Dems that they won't vote for him? Is Hillary counting votes?
All that I have heard is anecdotal. However, there's going to be plenty of blame if this election goes south and Reid and Pelosi haven't enamored themselves with a lot of Democrats before this. There's also a feeling that someone with a stronger backbone will be needed to deal with another Republican administration.

Last Thursday, Pelosi and Reid said they were on the verge of an agreement. They were wrong then. The Republicans couldn't well publicly contradict them without being labelled obstructionists. Today, by bringing it up for a vote, they essentially said they had the votes. I honestly don't know if they ever did have the votes or they brought it to a vote in hopes of forcing enough Republicans to vote for it.

Although Bush/Paulson proposed the bailout, the Democrats quickly took ownership of the issue Although Pelosi's title is Speaker of the House, she is essentially (in theory) the leader of the Democrats in the House. She could have gotten this bill passed without one single Republican vote (Clinton got the 1993 budget passed without a single Republican vote). All she needed was to come up with sufficient carrots or sticks to get 10 Democrats out of the 95 who opposed the bill to change their votes. She couldn't or wouldn't do it. Spin it any way you want, it's a failure of leadership.

User avatar
silvercamaro
Dog's Best Friend
Posts: 9608
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:45 am

#37 Post by silvercamaro » Mon Sep 29, 2008 3:17 pm

Bob Juch wrote:
JBillyGirl wrote:It does sound like Pelosi went overboard in giving her speech a partisan edge. (Talk about exactly the wrong time to do something like that.) However, I have no sympathy whatsoever for the Republicans who were going to vote for the bill but then changed their minds after her speech. You should vote on a bill based on its merits (or lack thereof), not because you didn't like something someone said. Especially now that the stakes are so high.
Barney Frank just said the same thing.
I agree in theory, but once reluctantly persuaded Congressmen felt their collective blood pressure soaring, all bets were off.

In the meantime, 40 percent of the Democrats voted against the bill. Who are they, and why couldn't they be persuaded by Pelosi to go along? If unified, the Democrats could have had enough votes to put the bill through with virtually no Republican support.

User avatar
silverscreenselect
Posts: 24609
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
Contact:

#38 Post by silverscreenselect » Mon Sep 29, 2008 3:23 pm

silvercamaro wrote:
Bob Juch wrote:
JBillyGirl wrote:It does sound like Pelosi went overboard in giving her speech a partisan edge. (Talk about exactly the wrong time to do something like that.) However, I have no sympathy whatsoever for the Republicans who were going to vote for the bill but then changed their minds after her speech. You should vote on a bill based on its merits (or lack thereof), not because you didn't like something someone said. Especially now that the stakes are so high.
Barney Frank just said the same thing.
I agree in theory, but once reluctantly persuaded Congressmen felt their collective blood pressure soaring, all bets were off.

In the meantime, 40 percent of the Democrats voted against the bill. Who are they, and why couldn't they be persuaded by Pelosi to go along? If unified, the Democrats could have had enough votes to put the bill through with virtually no Republican support.
Jesse Jackson, Jr., Obama's campaign chairman, voted against the bill. This bill supposedly reflected all the "Obama principles" but Obama couldn't or wouldn't even persuade his campaign chairman to vote for the bill, but they want to blame the Republicans.

User avatar
Ritterskoop
Posts: 5892
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 10:16 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC

#39 Post by Ritterskoop » Mon Sep 29, 2008 3:25 pm

silvercamaro wrote: Today it's not worth as much as it was yesterday, so maybe I'll just let it sit a decade or so longer than I intended, hoping that it still may recover and eventually grow beyond pre-nonbailout levels. At any rate, that's my plan as long as I can get by without it. Fortunately, that's not my sole source of retirement income.

I still believe the stock market will recover. Eventually.
It always does if you wait long enough.

You can come live with me if that doesn't work out.

Or Kay. She has more room, and I think the dogs would enjoy her pool.
If you fail to pilot your own ship, don't be surprised at what inappropriate port you find yourself docked. - Tom Robbins
--------
At the moment of commitment, the universe conspires to assist you. - attributed to Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.

User avatar
ulysses5019
Purveyor of Avatars
Posts: 19442
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:52 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA

#40 Post by ulysses5019 » Mon Sep 29, 2008 3:26 pm

Bob Juch wrote:
silverscreenselect wrote:You can be a fan of a football team and still criticize its coach or ask for his firing if he's lousy. The Democratic party, at a time when voters are ready to turn to them, has shown an abject failure of leadership.
Yeah, that's UCLA this year. I'm sure as hell not rooting for USC though!
How about the Sooners?
I believe in the usefulness of useless information.

User avatar
5LD
Posts: 493
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:52 am

#41 Post by 5LD » Mon Sep 29, 2008 3:38 pm

This crisis is potentially just the tip of the iceberg. The largest number of high risk ARMs to date reset this month.
"Tricks and treachery are the practice of fools, that don't have brains enough to be honest."
Ben Franklin

User avatar
silvercamaro
Dog's Best Friend
Posts: 9608
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:45 am

#42 Post by silvercamaro » Mon Sep 29, 2008 3:44 pm

Ritterskoop wrote:
You can come live with me if that doesn't work out.

Or Kay. She has more room, and I think the dogs would enjoy her pool.
Thanks, Skoop. Of course, I still have my secret plan B: Annie gets a job as a cattle security officer, and Lizbit becomes a newspaper delivery dog. They should take care of me for a change.

User avatar
Evil Squirrel
Merry Man
Posts: 1212
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2008 9:13 am
Location: Sprotsie Baby's back door!

#43 Post by Evil Squirrel » Mon Sep 29, 2008 7:08 pm

silvercamaro wrote:
Ritterskoop wrote:
You can come live with me if that doesn't work out.

Or Kay. She has more room, and I think the dogs would enjoy her pool.
Thanks, Skoop. Of course, I still have my secret plan B: Annie gets a job as a cattle security officer, and Lizbit becomes a newspaper delivery dog. They should take care of me for a change.

I like that idea. Tired dogs don't bark as much....

My tree's always available should you need a place to stay....
Squirrels are the architects of forests, the planters of trees, nature's own acrobats and show a zest for life that can inspire us. Every day should be National Squirrel Appreciation Day!

--squirrelmama (10/3/07)

Many of these (squirrel) migrations were probably caused by food shortages as well as habitat overcrowding. We solved that for them. We not only reduced their habitat, we reduced the whole species by about 90%. The least we can do now is share a little birdseed with them.

--Richard E. Mallery

2008 Squirrel of the Year Award winner

User avatar
ne1410s
Posts: 2961
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 5:26 pm
Location: The Friendly Confines

#44 Post by ne1410s » Mon Sep 29, 2008 7:28 pm

"The markets will fluctuate." J P Morgan
"When you argue with a fool, there are two fools in the argument."

User avatar
ulysses5019
Purveyor of Avatars
Posts: 19442
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:52 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA

#45 Post by ulysses5019 » Tue Sep 30, 2008 1:23 am

Evil Squirrel wrote:
silvercamaro wrote:
Ritterskoop wrote:
You can come live with me if that doesn't work out.

Or Kay. She has more room, and I think the dogs would enjoy her pool.
Thanks, Skoop. Of course, I still have my secret plan B: Annie gets a job as a cattle security officer, and Lizbit becomes a newspaper delivery dog. They should take care of me for a change.

I like that idea. Tired dogs don't bark as much....

My tree's always available should you need a place to stay....
Methinks there are already too many nuts in that tree.
I believe in the usefulness of useless information.

Post Reply