A home for the weary.
https://www.wwtbambored.com/
Three peeps were removed. How do you know it was based on race or sex? Guess you've never lived in a firing at will location.Weyoun wrote: ↑Sat Feb 22, 2025 9:01 pmAfter kicking out all those members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, I don’t think so. Every person let go was black or a woman, and they were all replaced by white men.
The new head of the Joint Chiefs required multiple waivers to get the position. Seems unqualified.
A really big clue is that everyone remaining is a white male, and it looks like everyone who is fired will be replaced by a white male.Beebs52 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 22, 2025 9:19 pmThree peeps were removed. How do you know it was based on race or sex? Guess you've never lived in a firing at will location.Weyoun wrote: ↑Sat Feb 22, 2025 9:01 pmAfter kicking out all those members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, I don’t think so. Every person let go was black or a woman, and they were all replaced by white men.
The new head of the Joint Chiefs required multiple waivers to get the position. Seems unqualified.
No, the message is you can take your mf*in racism and shove it up your f*ing ass.Weyoun wrote: ↑Sat Feb 22, 2025 10:22 pmA really big clue is that everyone remaining is a white male, and it looks like everyone who is fired will be replaced by a white male.Beebs52 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 22, 2025 9:19 pmThree peeps were removed. How do you know it was based on race or sex? Guess you've never lived in a firing at will location.Weyoun wrote: ↑Sat Feb 22, 2025 9:01 pmAfter kicking out all those members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, I don’t think so. Every person let go was black or a woman, and they were all replaced by white men.
The new head of the Joint Chiefs required multiple waivers to get the position. Seems unqualified.
Caine, of course, has been kissing Trump‘s ass for years, which is why the fact that he never made full general, or served in any position close to this, is not going to be a big deal, and Congress will once again fall over themselves to approve yet another dubious Trump nominee.
The message is: if you’re black, or a woman, don’t bother trying to climb the ladder. This is not a meritocracy.
Understandably, you get prickly when I point other white failures.flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 22, 2025 11:34 pmNo, the message is you can take your mf*in racism and shove it up your f*ing ass.Weyoun wrote: ↑Sat Feb 22, 2025 10:22 pmA really big clue is that everyone remaining is a white male, and it looks like everyone who is fired will be replaced by a white male.
Caine, of course, has been kissing Trump‘s ass for years, which is why the fact that he never made full general, or served in any position close to this, is not going to be a big deal, and Congress will once again fall over themselves to approve yet another dubious Trump nominee.
The message is: if you’re black, or a woman, don’t bother trying to climb the ladder. This is not a meritocracy.
So, I suppose you don't consider yourself a white failure? Assuming I am correct, is that because you're not white? Or because you're not a failure? Both or neither?Weyoun wrote: ↑Sun Feb 23, 2025 6:28 amUnderstandably, you get prickly when I point other white failures.flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 22, 2025 11:34 pmNo, the message is you can take your mf*in racism and shove it up your f*ing ass.Weyoun wrote: ↑Sat Feb 22, 2025 10:22 pm
A really big clue is that everyone remaining is a white male, and it looks like everyone who is fired will be replaced by a white male.
Caine, of course, has been kissing Trump‘s ass for years, which is why the fact that he never made full general, or served in any position close to this, is not going to be a big deal, and Congress will once again fall over themselves to approve yet another dubious Trump nominee.
The message is: if you’re black, or a woman, don’t bother trying to climb the ladder. This is not a meritocracy.
where Joy Reid and Alex Wagner have lost their prime-time anchor jobs.Rachel Maddow wrote:I will tell you, it is also unnerving to see that on a network where you’ve got two—count ’em, two—nonwhite hosts in prime time, both of our nonwhite hosts in prime time are losing their shows. That feels indefensible, and I do not defend it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59GK0jPjKgMflockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 23, 2025 3:50 pmSo, I suppose you don't consider yourself a white failure? Assuming I am correct, is that because you're not white? Or because you're not a failure? Both or neither?
Well, that wasn't me. I never got on the show because I had no idea who flockofseagulls were.silverscreenselect wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2025 11:25 amhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59GK0jPjKgMflockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 23, 2025 3:50 pmSo, I suppose you don't consider yourself a white failure? Assuming I am correct, is that because you're not white? Or because you're not a failure? Both or neither?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g9N-eyV6qPo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMcXW2MELs0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2VHpLP5xyEw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59GK0jPjKgMflockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 23, 2025 3:50 pmSo, I suppose you don't consider yourself a white failure? Assuming I am correct, is that because you're not white? Or because you're not a failure? Both or neither?
I still don't know what ifonly's insult 'whitefailure' means, and I don't get your clarification. Looks exactly the same to me.silverscreenselect wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2025 4:19 pmhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59GK0jPjKgMflockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 23, 2025 3:50 pmSo, I suppose you don't consider yourself a white failure? Assuming I am correct, is that because you're not white? Or because you're not a failure? Both or neither?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g9N-eyV6qPo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMcXW2MELs0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2VHpLP5xyEw
Giving a more complete context to my earlier post.
It is encouraging that even people whose lives are ruled and dictated by racism alone can still be taught to count. At least up to two.jarnon wrote: ↑Mon Feb 24, 2025 11:18 pmThe DEI purge has spread as far as MSNBCRachel Maddow wrote:I will tell you, it is also unnerving to see that on a network where you’ve got two—count ’em, two—nonwhite hosts in prime time, both of our nonwhite hosts in prime time are losing their shows. That feels indefensible, and I do not defend it.