WWTBAM Bored

I don't even know what to say. Taking a page from the "Buying Votes" chapter of the Democratic Party's campaign manual, Harris is moving on from trying to buy votes by having hard working Americans pay off the loans of folks who probably shouldn't have gone to college, to flat out telling black men I'll give you money if you vote for me.

Not even trying to hide her racism, the progam is titled "Opportunity Agenda for Black Men".

Harris unveils agenda to help Black men 'get ahead' as polls show Trump gains

The proposals include providing 1 million loans that are fully forgivable to Black entrepreneurs ....

Like the ill-advised student loan transfer of debt (called loan forgiveness, but there is no forgiving, they would still be paid off) this would likely not get past the Supreme Court as it is clearly un-Constitutional. But the Dems are hoping black men are just stupid enough to fall for this.

Desperation is the Dem candidate, who has been in office a heartbeat away from the presidency for nearly four years having nothing to point at for a reason to vote for her, no successful record to hang her hat on, and can literally only fabricate lies about her opponent and pander in an effort to gain votes.

I agree. It is terrible. It’s vote buying. It probably is too discriminatory under the constitution. It’s a moral hazard to give those types of loans out.

Doesn’t matter. There is one person running for president who is not deeply mentally ill. Her name is Kamala Harris not great, but at least you can trust the nuclear button with her.

Weyoun wrote: ↑

Tue Oct 15, 2024 3:03 pm

I agree. It is terrible. It’s vote buying. It probably is too discriminatory under the constitution. It’s a moral hazard to give those types of loans out.

Doesn’t matter. There is one person running for president who is not deeply mentally ill. Her name is Kamala Harris not great, but at least you can trust the nuclear button with her.

Sounds good. Deeply mentally ill with possible decent policies versus morally bankrupt ineptness and general policy evil.
Yeah. Button, hmmm

Beebs52 wrote: ↑

Tue Oct 15, 2024 3:35 pm

Weyoun wrote: ↑

Tue Oct 15, 2024 3:03 pm

I agree. It is terrible. It’s vote buying. It probably is too discriminatory under the constitution. It’s a moral hazard to give those types of loans out.

Doesn’t matter. There is one person running for president who is not deeply mentally ill. Her name is Kamala Harris not great, but at least you can trust the nuclear button with her.

Sounds good. Deeply mentally ill with possible decent policies versus morally bankrupt ineptness and general policy evil.
Yeah. Button, hmmm

Exactly.

He’s said he’ll put people in camps. Don’t hurt your shoulder too much when patting your own back.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of ... ted_States

Seriously?

Weyoun wrote: ↑

Tue Oct 15, 2024 5:41 pm

He’s said he’ll put people in camps. Don’t hurt your shoulder too much when patting your own back.

Many should be. Some flat out should be sent back to where they came from.

Are of the mind that no one, without exception, should be free to walk around the country doing whatever they please?

BackInTex wrote: ↑

Tue Oct 15, 2024 5:59 pm

Weyoun wrote: ↑

Tue Oct 15, 2024 5:41 pm

He’s said he’ll put people in camps. Don’t hurt your shoulder too much when patting your own back.

Many should be. Some flat out should be sent back to where they came from.

Are of the mind that no one, without exception, should be free to walk around the country doing whatever they please?

“Should be” seems strong. My guess is that some of your ancestors didn’t have proper paperwork either. I think there needs to be much, much regulation of this stuff, but locking people up and sending them “back” seems harsh if they are contributing.

But I suppose I should be grateful that you don’t want police to choke them to death. I will take that to suggesy you are evolving as a person.

Weyoun wrote: ↑

Tue Oct 15, 2024 10:44 pm

BackInTex wrote: ↑

Tue Oct 15, 2024 5:59 pm

Weyoun wrote: ↑

Tue Oct 15, 2024 5:41 pm

He’s said he’ll put people in camps. Don’t hurt your shoulder too much when patting your own back.

Many should be. Some flat out should be sent back to where they came from.

Are of the mind that no one, without exception, should be free to walk around the country doing whatever they please?

“Should be” seems strong. My guess is that some of your ancestors didn’t have proper paperwork either. I think there needs to be much, much regulation of this stuff, but locking people up and sending them “back” seems harsh if they are contributing.

But I suppose I should be grateful that you don’t want police to choke them to death. I will take that to suggesy you are evolving as a person.

You added an "if" so I'm assuming absent the "if" you are also, like me, in favor of locking some up, and sending some back. I'll take that to suggest you are evolving as a reasonable person.

You'll note my use of "some" in my original post, which would require an "if" to make a determination between the "some" and the others. I did not, and never have said "all". Small words matter.

BackInTex wrote: ↑

Wed Oct 16, 2024 7:07 am

Weyoun wrote: ↑

Tue Oct 15, 2024 10:44 pm

BackInTex wrote: ↑

Tue Oct 15, 2024 5:59 pm

Many should be. Some flat out should be sent back to where they came from.

Are of the mind that no one, without exception, should be free to walk around the country doing whatever they please?

“Should be” seems strong. My guess is that some of your ancestors didn’t have proper paperwork either. I think there needs to be much, much regulation of this stuff, but locking people up and sending them “back” seems harsh if they are contributing.

But I suppose I should be grateful that you don’t want police to choke them to death. I will take that to suggesy you are evolving as a person.

You added an "if" so I'm assuming absent the "if" you are also, like me, in favor of locking some up, and sending some back. I'll take that to suggest you are evolving as a reasonable person.

You'll note my use of "some" in my original post, which would require an "if" to make a determination between the "some" and the others. I did not, and never have said "all". Small words matter.

Your question didn’t make sense.

wbtravis007 wrote: ↑

Wed Oct 16, 2024 7:27 am

BackInTex wrote: ↑

Wed Oct 16, 2024 7:07 am

Weyoun wrote: ↑

Tue Oct 15, 2024 10:44 pm

“Should be” seems strong. My guess is that some of your ancestors didn’t have proper paperwork either. I think there needs to be much, much regulation of this stuff, but locking people up and sending them “back” seems harsh if they are contributing.

But I suppose I should be grateful that you don’t want police to choke them to death. I will take that to suggesy you are evolving as a person.

You added an "if" so I'm assuming absent the "if" you are also, like me, in favor of locking some up, and sending some back. I'll take that to suggest you are evolving as a reasonable person.

You'll note my use of "some" in my original post, which would require an "if" to make a determination between the "some" and the others. I did not, and never have said "all". Small words matter.

Your question didn’t make sense.

It does if you add the missing word. Not hard to figure out, if you're a thinking person. Lots of posts here have missing words, misspellings etc. Expecially when folks use their phones to post, with limited screen visability and the more wrong than right auto-complete, etc. and spouses continually asking "What are you doing?" that makes one hurry so you can reply "Nothing".

I'm sorry if you couldn't figure it out. It wasn't intended for you so I didn't feel the need to simplify.

BackInTex wrote: ↑

Wed Oct 16, 2024 8:23 am

wbtravis007 wrote: ↑

Wed Oct 16, 2024 7:27 am

BackInTex wrote: ↑

Wed Oct 16, 2024 7:07 am

You added an "if" so I'm assuming absent the "if" you are also, like me, in favor of locking some up, and sending some back. I'll take that to suggest you are evolving as a reasonable person.

You'll note my use of "some" in my original post, which would require an "if" to make a determination between the "some" and the others. I did not, and never have said "all". Small words matter.

Your question didn’t make sense.

It does if you add the missing word. Not hard to figure out, if you're a thinking person. Lots of posts here have missing words, misspellings etc. Expecially when folks use their phones to post, with limited screen visability and the more wrong than right auto-complete, etc. and spouses continually asking "What are you doing?" that makes one hurry so you can reply "Nothing".

I'm sorry if you couldn't figure it out. It wasn't intended for you so I didn't feel the need to simplify.

Got it. That makes sense, and I’ll assume that it explains a lot of your other posts here as well.

Or the airport lounge.

Just saw a clip of the Harris interview with Baier

79% of people polled say the country is on the wrong track. Harris: Trump has been running for office.

tlynn78 wrote: ↑

Wed Oct 16, 2024 5:22 pm

Just saw a clip of the Harris interview with Baier

79% of people polled say the country is on the wrong track. Harris: Trump has been running for office.

That was the answer to every question. Shes got nothing else. But it's enough for the TDS sufferers here.

flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑

Wed Oct 16, 2024 7:56 pm

tlynn78 wrote: ↑

Wed Oct 16, 2024 5:22 pm

Just saw a clip of the Harris interview with Baier

79% of people polled say the country is on the wrong track. Harris: Trump has been running for office.

That was the answer to every question. Shes got nothing else. But it's enough for the TDS sufferers here.

No it was not the answer to every question. There was the "I will follow the law." when asked about her positions on the border and transgenderism with regards to prisoners and military. I think Baier failed in not rephrasing his questions based on that response. He should have followed up with "I understand and respect that you will follow the law, but given your comments on your position, will you attempt to change the laws to meet your position."

BackInTex wrote: ↑

Thu Oct 17, 2024 11:54 am

No it was not the answer to every question. There was the "I will follow the law." when asked about her positions on the border and transgenderism with regards to prisoners and military. I think Baier failed in not rephrasing his questions based on that response. He should have followed up with "I understand and respect that you will follow the law, but given your comments on your position, will you attempt to change the laws to meet your position."

On the border, Harris clearly stated she wants to change the law and is willing to compromise with conservatives. She named two efforts by the Biden administration that were rejected by Senate Republicans.

As for transgender prisoners, I think these cases should be handled individually based on medical need. A sex change could ease psychological distress and help an inmate become an honest citizen.

jarnon wrote: ↑

Thu Oct 17, 2024 12:27 pm

BackInTex wrote: ↑

Thu Oct 17, 2024 11:54 am

No it was not the answer to every question. There was the "I will follow the law." when asked about her positions on the border and transgenderism with regards to prisoners and military. I think Baier failed in not rephrasing his questions based on that response. He should have followed up with "I understand and respect that you will follow the law, but given your comments on your position, will you attempt to change the laws to meet your position."

On the border, Harris clearly stated she wants to change the law and is willing to compromise with conservatives. She named two efforts by the Biden administration that were rejected by Senate Republicans.

As for transgender prisoners, I think these cases should be handled individually based on medical need. A sex change could ease psychological distress and help an inmate become an honest citizen.

The first one failed when they had the White House, the Senate and the House. On the second, some Dems also voted against the Ukraine funding "border" bill.

You are full on delusional on the second issue.

This is who you're supporting, dems?

WAKE THE FUCK UP!

flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑

Thu Oct 17, 2024 9:12 pm

This is who you're supporting, dems?

WAKE THE FUCK UP!

https://fortune.com/2024/08/08/tim-walz-net-worth/

I’ve seen other articles mentioned a pension, which would be tied up and not readily available to him. Either way, he does not seem to have the cash flow that you think he does, dickhead. He was a public school teacher after all.

Weyoun wrote: ↑

Sat Oct 19, 2024 9:47 pm

flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑

Thu Oct 17, 2024 9:12 pm

This is who you're supporting, dems?

WAKE THE FUCK UP!

https://fortune.com/2024/08/08/tim-walz-net-worth/

I’ve seen other articles mentioned a pension, which would be tied up and not readily available to him. Either way, he does not seem to have the cash flow that you think he does, dickhead. He was a public school teacher after all.

Until he got fired.

Weyoun wrote: ↑

Sat Oct 19, 2024 9:47 pm

flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑

Thu Oct 17, 2024 9:12 pm

This is who you're supporting, dems?

WAKE THE FUCK UP!

https://fortune.com/2024/08/08/tim-walz-net-worth/

I’ve seen other articles mentioned a pension, which would be tied up and not readily available to him. Either way, he does not seem to have the cash flow that you think he does, dickhead. He was a public school teacher after all.

My cash flow isn't great, either, I mean, I still have to hold down a full time job while campaigning, but I still manage to make sure my mom isn't waiting on her SS check to eat. Of course, I don't need to use scare tactics to get elected.

Perhaps he could raise money by selling autographed Bibles.

Weyoun wrote: ↑

Sun Oct 20, 2024 12:27 pm

Perhaps he could raise money by selling autographed Bibles.

He'd do better selling autographed palestinian flags. Then he could make sure his mom had something to eat and support the destruction of Israel at the same time. Or maybe bet on women's sports teams that have a man on them. Lot's of better ideas for him. Don't want to spread anything to do with Christianity. That would be verboten.