Page 1 of 1

Is it true?

Posted: Thu Aug 22, 2024 7:56 pm
by Weyoun
That Kamala Harris has been endorsed by every living Dem ex-president, and pretty much every Democratic politician, but Donald Trump cannot get an endorsement from Bush?

Before the usual dum-dum talks about the swamp, why is it also that 40 of Donald Trump‘s 44 cabinet officers from his last administration won’t endorse him either?

I’m thinking it’s because Trump is a dangerous, narcissistic asshole, and a piece of shit.

FYI

Re: Is it true?

Posted: Thu Aug 22, 2024 8:30 pm
by flockofseagulls104
Weyoun wrote:
Thu Aug 22, 2024 7:56 pm
That Kamala Harris has been endorsed by every living Dem ex-president, and pretty much every Democratic politician, but Donald Trump cannot get an endorsement from Bush?

Before the usual dum-dum talks about the swamp, why is it also that 40 of Donald Trump‘s 44 cabinet officers from his last administration won’t endorse him either?

I’m thinking it’s because Trump is a dangerous, narcissistic asshole, and a piece of shit.

FYI
That Kamala Harris has been endorsed by every living Dem ex-president, and pretty much every Democratic politician
Duh?


doc, Is there a medical treatment for your TDS?

First of all, this looks like where you got your numbers. Maybe you can look at the date?

Secondly since you brought up the subject, I did some research. Here's the Washington Post's attempt at 'journalism'. They come up with different numbers. I also notice that they fudge the numbers a bit. They say that 24 of them support trump. And they say that 3 didn't. And that 15 'wouldn't say'. But they admit that they tried to contact all 42, but only 20 responded. (somehow, a lot of republicans don't seem to want to talk to the Washington Post. I wonder why?) So apparently the overwhelming majority of those that they actually spoke to support trump. They could only find 3 that oppose him. So they title their article 'Only half of trumps cabinet support him'.

So you based your well-thought-out post on regurgitated, year old bullshit. And even if you bothered to research what you are claiming, you would get the bullshit that the WP puts out. You are way behind the eightball, doc.
trump may be a dangerous, narcissistic asshole, and a piece of shit, but you and the media conglomerate are full of shit.

That's a new one. I think I'll add to my signature.

Re: Is it true?

Posted: Thu Aug 22, 2024 9:54 pm
by Bob Juch
So you're going to vote for this piece of shit?

Skip ahead to 6:00 if you must:


Re: Is it true?

Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2024 5:05 am
by Pastor Fireball
Weyoun wrote:
Thu Aug 22, 2024 7:56 pm
I’m thinking it’s because Trump is a dangerous, narcissistic asshole, and a piece of shit.
That's offensive to anuses and feces. Anuses and feces have an actual purpose in life.

Re: Is it true?

Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2024 8:09 am
by Weyoun
Thanks for everyone’s feedback. I was asking a question, after all.

So it does seem to be true. Multiple people who worked for Donald Trump will not endorse him. That’s curious. Especially when they seem to be some of more reputable ones.

I’m guessing Mark Esper had problems with Trump suggesting that he ordered the military to shoot American citizens.

Yet a bunch of crybabies here are more mad about the potential vice president suggesting that you call the police your neighbor is having a Covid party.

Once again, the theme is that half (really, like 30%) the country doesn’t seem to really care if random strangers just die from either Covid or American soldiers shooting them.

Muh freedom!

Re: Is it true?

Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2024 9:09 am
by BackInTex
Weyoun wrote:
Fri Aug 23, 2024 8:09 am
Thanks for everyone’s feedback. I was asking a question, after all.

So it does seem to be true. Multiple people who worked for Donald Trump will not endorse him. That’s curious. Especially when they seem to be some of more reputable ones.

I’m guessing Mark Esper had problems with Trump suggesting that he ordered the military to shoot American citizens.

Yet a bunch of crybabies here are more mad about the potential vice president suggesting that you call the police your neighbor is having a Covid party.

Once again, the theme is that half (really, like 30%) the country doesn’t seem to really care if random strangers just die from either Covid or American soldiers shooting them.

Muh freedom!
Serious question Weyoun. When, and what was the context, where Trump suggested shooting American citizens?

Re: Is it true?

Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2024 11:11 am
by Weyoun
BackInTex wrote:
Fri Aug 23, 2024 9:09 am
Weyoun wrote:
Fri Aug 23, 2024 8:09 am
Thanks for everyone’s feedback. I was asking a question, after all.

So it does seem to be true. Multiple people who worked for Donald Trump will not endorse him. That’s curious. Especially when they seem to be some of more reputable ones.

I’m guessing Mark Esper had problems with Trump suggesting that he ordered the military to shoot American citizens.

Yet a bunch of crybabies here are more mad about the potential vice president suggesting that you call the police your neighbor is having a Covid party.

Once again, the theme is that half (really, like 30%) the country doesn’t seem to really care if random strangers just die from either Covid or American soldiers shooting them.

Muh freedom!
Serious question Weyoun. When, and what was the context, where Trump suggested shooting American citizens?
https://www.npr.org/2022/05/09/10975174 ... -secretary

I know that you’ve advocated police power being allowed to shoot Black people if they commit ANY kind of crime, like passing off a counterfeit $20, but most of us find that to be abhorrent

Re: Is it true?

Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2024 11:31 am
by flockofseagulls104
I know that you’ve advocated police power being allowed to shoot Black people if they commit ANY kind of crime, like passing off a counterfeit $20, but most of us find that to be abhorrent
You know nothing. The content of your posts here, which I've seen in full and in context, show you to be truly a despicable person. Much worse than the lies and propaganda you post about trump portrays him to be.

Re: Is it true?

Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2024 11:46 am
by BackInTex
Weyoun wrote:
Fri Aug 23, 2024 11:11 am
BackInTex wrote:
Fri Aug 23, 2024 9:09 am
Weyoun wrote:
Fri Aug 23, 2024 8:09 am
Thanks for everyone’s feedback. I was asking a question, after all.

So it does seem to be true. Multiple people who worked for Donald Trump will not endorse him. That’s curious. Especially when they seem to be some of more reputable ones.

I’m guessing Mark Esper had problems with Trump suggesting that he ordered the military to shoot American citizens.

Yet a bunch of crybabies here are more mad about the potential vice president suggesting that you call the police your neighbor is having a Covid party.

Once again, the theme is that half (really, like 30%) the country doesn’t seem to really care if random strangers just die from either Covid or American soldiers shooting them.

Muh freedom!
Serious question Weyoun. When, and what was the context, where Trump suggested shooting American citizens?
https://www.npr.org/2022/05/09/10975174 ... -secretary
So your "evidence" is heresay, without any context of the discussion. Similar to foolish claims "Tump suggested injecting yourself with bleach".

Yet American citizen Ashley Babbit WAS shot, and killed during a protest. and you are O.K. with it. You are O.K. with there not being any investigation, too.
Weyoun wrote:
Fri Aug 23, 2024 11:11 am
I know that you’ve advocated police power being allowed to shoot Black people if they commit ANY kind of crime, like passing off a counterfeit $20, but most of us find that to be abhorrent
That's BS and you know it. I don't see how someone with a medical license is so f'king ignorant. Perhaps the standards in PA are low enough. I don't know. I hope I never get sick there.