WWTBAM Bored

Despite what you hear from politicians and the media, who almost never lie to you (snort), the issue of non-citizens voting is a very real and serious issue. It is the one area of election integrity that cannot be monitored by concerned citizens, because there are NO lists that anyone can find that can even give one a hint of a person's citizenship status. These lists exist, but they are very diligently and deliberately locked down by the powers that be. Many credible and documented studies have indicated that a great percentage of non-citizens are on our voter rolls right now. These are exactly the kind of registrations that have been used in the past by bad actors to cast illegal votes.

It is believed by a great many 'people who are familiar with the subject' (to quote a phrase often used by our press) that this is the main reason why our current administration has allowed millions of illegals to flood into our country. And why they resist any attempt to remove them from the voter rolls. Of course, they will trumpet, like our own Raffensperger does, that they've removed a few dozen that they've found. But there are countless thousands more that they don't 'find'.

The democrats, who overwhelmingly voted against the SAVE act will say 'Hey, it's already against the law!' When has that stopped anything the left wants? There were a handful of dems who voted for the SAVE Act in the House. Unless you want our country to be ruled by votes from non-citizens, or more likely those who use their registrations to cast their votes for them, please contact your Senators and tell them you do not want non-citizens to vote and to support the SAVE Act in the Senate. We do not need any more points of contention that will drag this election on for years and cast doubt on its validity. Biden has said he will veto it, but maybe he will have a senior moment and forget to do it.

Anyone who truly believes allowing non-citizens a binding vote on anything is seriously flawed, mentally, or just hate this country so much they want it to be like any other country, any, just something else.

BackInTex wrote: ↑

Thu Jul 11, 2024 4:32 pm

Anyone who truly believes allowing non-citizens a binding vote on anything is seriously flawed, mentally, or just hate this country so much they want it to be like any other country, any, just something else.

Based on their actions and their proven, indisputable lies that they've fed the public through the media they control, that pretty much describes most of the democrat party.

flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑

Thu Jul 11, 2024 4:22 pm

It is believed by a great many 'people who are familiar with the subject' (to quote a phrase often used by our press) that this is the main reason why our current administration has allowed millions of illegals to flood into our country. And why they resist any attempt to remove them from the voter rolls. Of course, they will trumpet, like our own Raffensperger does, that they've removed a few dozen that they've found. But there are countless thousands more that they don't 'find'.

The so-called "SAVE" Act isn't designed to keep non-citizens from voting. It's designed to make it more difficult for the type of people who usually vote Democratic to vote. Lots of married women (or women who divorce and take back their birth names) don't update their birth certificates, and there are lots of others who have difficulty finding records of their birth or simply don't have them anymore because they've been lost or destroyed. And allowing more challenges allows for more of the frivolous lawsuits and challenges we've seen here in Georgia where people routinely challenge and lose dozens or hundreds of cases before election boards.

Undocumented migrants don't want to vote because they don't want to do anything to draw attention to themselves (that's why they usually drive very slowly and cautiously). Again, the "great many people who are familiar with the subject" are mostly indoctrinated nincompoops like Flock who believe whatever somebody on Twitter tells them.

I don't expect much from you, but I have posted just a few examples of the thousands of instances of outright fraud the GA Nerds have found. And they only concentrate on manipulation of the voter roll to enable casting of illegal votes that violate MY CIVIL RIGHTS. You, like the 60 court cases, and the current GA Board of Elections, ignore the obvious evidence and sweep it under the rug with legal tricks and imaginative misinterpretations of rules and laws. We need to stop this fraud from happening BEFORE the elections take place, not find them afterward so they can be ignored by corrupt politicians and lawyers.

One of the main reasons for the elimination of any control of our border is to bloat the voter roll with registrations that can be used for this purpose, in addition to changing the electoral college balance. Georgia, according to US Election Assistance Commission, has already registered 103% of its Voting Age Population. And this was in 2022! The most important part of the SAVE Act is to release data as to who is a citizen and who isn't so these non-citizens can be removed from the voter rolls in all the states.

This is a crucial issue, and anyone who continues to stand in the way of the rights of American Citizens to protect the sanctity of their votes is, to use your own words, an enemy of democracy.

flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑

Fri Jul 12, 2024 7:53 am

You, like the 60 court cases, and the current GA Board of Elections, ignore the obvious evidence and sweep it under the rug with legal tricks and imaginative misinterpretations of rules and laws.

The "legal tricks and imaginative misinterpretations of ruies and laws" are how our justice system has worked for the last 250 years. Did you ever stop to think that the problem might be with your so-called "proof" rather than the overwhelming number of fact finders who have found against you.

Whenever your so-called proof is challenged in a legal forum, it always falls apart. Remember what happened when the 2000 Mules people had to put up or shut up? They shut up, but not after having to cough up money in legal settlements.

silverscreenselect wrote: ↑

Fri Jul 12, 2024 8:58 am

flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑

Fri Jul 12, 2024 7:53 am

You, like the 60 court cases, and the current GA Board of Elections, ignore the obvious evidence and sweep it under the rug with legal tricks and imaginative misinterpretations of rules and laws.

The "legal tricks and imaginative misinterpretations of ruies and laws" are how our justice system has worked for the last 250 years. Did you ever stop to think that the problem might be with your so-called "proof" rather than the overwhelming number of fact finders who have found against you.

Whenever your so-called proof is challenged in a legal forum, it always falls apart. Remember what happened when the 2000 Mules people had to put up or shut up? They shut up, but not after having to cough up money in legal settlements.

Yes, trollboy, I think about it a lot. Unlike you, I investigate for myself and have come to the unmistakable conclusion that we are being lied to. Once again, you are in episodic mode. My 'so-called proof' is unimpeachable proof. You just refuse to examine it. If you had any mind of your own, you would see it too. Just by the fact that you are supporting biden being replaced you acknowledge you have been lied to on that subject for many years.

I mean, Real ID requires those women to jump through all those hoops.

tlynn78 wrote: ↑

Fri Jul 12, 2024 12:03 pm

I mean, Real ID requires those women to jump through all those hoops.

Real ID as it is currently defined is not the answer. There is no indicator of citizenship status on a Real ID.

flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑

Fri Jul 12, 2024 9:54 am

silverscreenselect wrote: ↑

Fri Jul 12, 2024 8:58 am

flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑

Fri Jul 12, 2024 7:53 am

You, like the 60 court cases, and the current GA Board of Elections, ignore the obvious evidence and sweep it under the rug with legal tricks and imaginative misinterpretations of rules and laws.

The "legal tricks and imaginative misinterpretations of ruies and laws" are how our justice system has worked for the last 250 years. Did you ever stop to think that the problem might be with your so-called "proof" rather than the overwhelming number of fact finders who have found against you.

Whenever your so-called proof is challenged in a legal forum, it always falls apart. Remember what happened when the 2000 Mules people had to put up or shut up? They shut up, but not after having to cough up money in legal settlements.

Just by the fact that you are supporting biden being replaced you acknowledge you have been lied to on that subject for many years.

I guess you didn't do too good when they were trying to teach you about syllogisms and what not.

silverscreenselect wrote: ↑

Fri Jul 12, 2024 8:58 am

flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑

Fri Jul 12, 2024 7:53 am

You, like the 60 court cases, and the current GA Board of Elections, ignore the obvious evidence and sweep it under the rug with legal tricks and imaginative misinterpretations of rules and laws.

The "legal tricks and imaginative misinterpretations of ruies and laws" are how our justice system has worked for the last 250 years. Did you ever stop to think that the problem might be with your so-called "proof" rather than the overwhelming number of fact finders who have found against you.

Whenever your so-called proof is challenged in a legal forum, it always falls apart. Remember what happened when the 2000 Mules people had to put up or shut up? They shut up, but not after having to cough up money in legal settlements.

I have already addressed your 60 court cases ad nauseum. You refuse to address the points I have made and keep going back to that as a response.

Here is the problem in a nutshell. And the solution. Address that trollboy.

Things have changed from 250 years ago, trollboy. It is called the DC Swamp. Your 60 court cases are a moot argument. It is only relevant in your bullshit world.

flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑

Fri Jul 12, 2024 6:14 pm

Things have changed from 250 years ago, trollboy. It is called the DC Swamp. Your 60 court cases are a moot argument. It is only relevant in your bullshit world.

It may be the DC Swamp, but the decisions of those 60 court cases are still the law of the land. Just ask Rudy Giuliani.

And your spreadsheets are just mindless doodlings.

silverscreenselect wrote: ↑

Fri Jul 12, 2024 7:22 pm

flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑

Fri Jul 12, 2024 6:14 pm

Things have changed from 250 years ago, trollboy. It is called the DC Swamp. Your 60 court cases are a moot argument. It is only relevant in your bullshit world.

It may be the DC Swamp, but the decisions of those 60 court cases are still the law of the land. Just ask Rudy Giuliani.

And your spreadsheets are just mindless doodlings.

In your bullshit world only. What is mindless doodling is sentencing someone to jail for classifying payments to a lawyer as legal expenses. What is mindless doodling is valuing a property like Mar A Lago at 18 million dollars. What is mindless is what has been done to the J6 political prisoners, which also includes Peter Navarro and Steve Bannon, but does not include Merrick Garland. My data is clear-cut and completely verifiable evidence to anyone who has a mind. It is obvious you don't have one. The proclamations you continue to cite are just that, proclamations without any evidence or proof. If there's nothing to hide, let us see the ballots.

Accountability will be hell. And I will feel as sorry for those who are finally held accountable as you do for Giuliani.

flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑

Fri Jul 12, 2024 7:51 pm

My data is clear-cut and completely verifiable evidence to anyone who has a mind.

You sound like Captain Queeg discussing his strawberry investigation.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KekChFdIe00

silverscreenselect wrote: ↑

Fri Jul 12, 2024 10:23 pm

flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑

Fri Jul 12, 2024 7:51 pm

My data is clear-cut and completely verifiable evidence to anyone who has a mind.

You sound like Captain Queeg discussing his strawberry investigation.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KekChFdIe00

Thank you for that astute, on-point observation, Gregory Anton.

silverscreenselect wrote: ↑

Fri Jul 12, 2024 10:23 pm

flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑

Fri Jul 12, 2024 7:51 pm

My data is clear-cut and completely verifiable evidence to anyone who has a mind.

You sound like Captain Queeg discussing his strawberry investigation.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KekChFdIe00

Well at least he was a CITIZEN, damnit!

Oh. Wait.

That was Kane, not the Caine.

<Rick Perry> oops. <Rick Perry>