VP Harris endorses Trump

[flockofseagulls104]

OMG here's another shithead liar from a rightwing source. Probably paid to say it. Can't believe her unless she's on CBS or NBS or CNN or what have you, right? Those 'news' networks know what the truth is, and protect you by making sure you don't hear any of this disinformation. So you won't, if you only listen to them.
But stay comfortable in your ignorance. Don't wake up until it's too late.

Yes, there are others who believe as you do, and X is just full of them. I have no doubt that she is sincere, but I suspect that there are others like her who don't share that viewpoint.

Like my friend Lindy Li, who’s Biden’s most ardent supporter.

My Socialism Nightmare: Chinese immigrant warns of dire socialism dangers in US

Wow. Her criticism of Bernie Sanders is right on. I have no idea how she cannot see how the cabal behind Harris is exactly the same as what Sanders stands for. How is Harris going to pay for Medicare for all, for price controls on food and housing. All of which are socialism. Does she not know that harris was brought up by a radical communist professor?

She confirms that the US is heading towards communism. How she can think that the democrat party is going to prevent that is beyond explanation. Especially when all the socialists and communists inhabit her party and when trump has emphatically declared that the US will never become socialist under his administration. Perhaps she has succumbed to the TDS in her party. She has lost her way.

And once again I will point out: Trump is not a cult figure. The movement he leads started a long time before he came into the picture. Remember the Tea Party? You know, that movement that was attacked and blasted into 'obscurity' by the media conglomerate? The same tactics that they have used against trump? Trump's not a cult figure, but he is the standard bearer of the Tea Party movement, which never went away, but has grown. And he has shown he will not succumb to the pressure, lies and attacks that are thrown at him daily. That is why we support him and will continue to support him no matter what 'they' say about him. THEY have lost all credibility, which is why the sham indictments, verdicts and anything else your side throws at him only increase his popularity. That's what your side doesn't get.

[flockofseagulls104]

Seriously, do you guys ever really hear the crap you repeat? I hate to burst your fragile bubble, krox, but there actually isn't any "pledge of loyalty." It's real impressive how y'all on the left get to be the arbiter of who we on the right should support. The people of Wyoming decided Cheney did not represent their majority the way they wanted. Turns out they were right, since she was more interested in helping the attempts to destroy Trump than carrying out her Jan6 duties with even a scrap of ethics.
Lots of people "hate" Trump because they've been told to - especially those too intellectually lazy to look below the surface of prevailing media bias.

Then how do you explain the fact that a bipartisan immigration bill had been negotiated, led by Jim Lankford, a staunch Republican. It was going to pass until Trump said he was against it - then all the Republican sheep in Congress suddenly were against it, and it went down to defeat. If that's not "loyalty to Trump", then what is it?

ear, you are terribly misinformed. The bill you refer to is NOT bi-partisan except for RINOs that attached their names to it. Having more than a million illegal aliens a year enter this country is not a compromise, it is wrong. The number should be exactly zero.

What is never mentioned, and that you are obviously unaware of is HB 2. If you care about being informed, educate yourself on it. Your news sources will never tell you about it. And look at the SAVE act, which will prevent non citizens from voting in our federal elections. A few Dem House members actually voted for it, but chances are not one single dem Senator. They WANT non-citizens to vote. That is why they opened the borders, and that is how they plan to cheat in the 2024 election. They are even fast tracking naturalization, probably the only government function that has become more efficient.
Please wake up.

[wbtravis007]

Seriously, do you guys ever really hear the crap you repeat? I hate to burst your fragile bubble, krox, but there actually isn't any "pledge of loyalty." It's real impressive how y'all on the left get to be the arbiter of who we on the right should support. The people of Wyoming decided Cheney did not represent their majority the way they wanted. Turns out they were right, since she was more interested in helping the attempts to destroy Trump than carrying out her Jan6 duties with even a scrap of ethics.
Lots of people "hate" Trump because they've been told to - especially those too intellectually lazy to look below the surface of prevailing media bias.

Why, I can scarcely imagine not being able to rely on what the mainstream media tells me to think about Trump, and instead having to worry my pretty little head about what I see with my own eyes and hear with my own ears and perceive through my own experiences to evaluate whether he is a repugnant and deeply damaged and deranged individual.

As for Cheney, it is evident that “someone” here — (well, actually several here) — watched very little, if any, of the January 6 hearings, having been told over and over again by those who didn’t want them to watch that they shouldn’t, but nevertheless still consider themselves to be well-informed on the subject. Just because.

Sad.

[earendel]

Seriously, do you guys ever really hear the crap you repeat? I hate to burst your fragile bubble, krox, but there actually isn't any "pledge of loyalty." It's real impressive how y'all on the left get to be the arbiter of who we on the right should support. The people of Wyoming decided Cheney did not represent their majority the way they wanted. Turns out they were right, since she was more interested in helping the attempts to destroy Trump than carrying out her Jan6 duties with even a scrap of ethics.
Lots of people "hate" Trump because they've been told to - especially those too intellectually lazy to look below the surface of prevailing media bias.

Then how do you explain the fact that a bipartisan immigration bill had been negotiated, led by Jim Lankford, a staunch Republican. It was going to pass until Trump said he was against it - then all the Republican sheep in Congress suddenly were against it, and it went down to defeat. If that's not "loyalty to Trump", then what is it?

ear, you are terribly misinformed. The bill you refer to is NOT bi-partisan except for RINOs that attached their names to it. Having more than a million illegal aliens a year enter this country is not a compromise, it is wrong. The number should be exactly zero.

Last time I checked, "bipartisan" meant that it was agreed upon by both sides. And Lankford is hardly a RINO.

What is never mentioned, and that you are obviously unaware of is HB 2. If you care about being informed, educate yourself on it. Your news sources will never tell you about it. And look at the SAVE act, which will prevent non citizens from voting in our federal elections. A few Dem House members actually voted for it, but chances are not one single dem Senator. They WANT non-citizens to vote. That is why they opened the borders, and that is how they plan to cheat in the 2024 election. They are even fast tracking naturalization, probably the only government function that has become more efficient.
Please wake up.

Yes, I'm aware of HB2. Are YOU aware of how many of the provisions of HB2 were made a part of the bipartisan(yes, I will continue to use that term) bill that Trump wanted defeated. As for the SAVE Act, it is hardly necessary since it is already illegal for non-citizens to vote in federal elections, so another piece of legislation is unnecessary. As for the article you posted, that has to do with CITIZENS voting after becoming naturalized. That's a different issue.

[flockofseagulls104]

Last time I checked, "bipartisan" meant that it was agreed upon by both sides. And Lankford is hardly a RINO.

Apparently, it wasn't bi-partisan enough, was it? Labeled 'bi-partisan' by the partisans.

As for the SAVE Act, it is hardly necessary since it is already illegal for non-citizens to vote in federal elections, so another piece of legislation is unnecessary.

As if having a law would stop the swamp from anything. Who's being naive now, Kaye?

The SAVE Act has provisions to release non-citizen data so that the voter rolls can be purged of non-citizens. This data is currently held under lock and key by the feds. This data is a critical requirement to secure our elections. Sadly, it won't be passed by this bunch of idiots in time for November. Maybe next year if we can overcome the non-citizen vote. You want non-citizens to vote, ear? The latest thing they're doing is mailing out tons of UOCAVA ballots to the non-military overseas population.

And I realize texting sometimes makes comprehension a little vague. So I'll give you a little leeway there. The point is that they are trying to get as many NEW citizens on the roll as possible, so they are fast-tracking the process. Don't confuse me with a Harris voter.

[earendel]

Last time I checked, "bipartisan" meant that it was agreed upon by both sides. And Lankford is hardly a RINO.

Apparently, it wasn't bi-partisan enough, was it? Labeled 'bi-partisan' by the partisans.

Labeled by both sides. Lankford is hardly a RINO and he had the backing of Senate Republicans until Trump said it was a bad bill. He probably said that in order to ensure that immigration would be a hot topic for his campaign.

As for the SAVE Act, it is hardly necessary since it is already illegal for non-citizens to vote in federal elections, so another piece of legislation is unnecessary.

As if having a law would stop the swamp from anything. Who's being naive now, Kaye?

The SAVE Act has provisions to release non-citizen data so that the voter rolls can be purged of non-citizens. This data is currently held under lock and key by the feds. This data is a critical requirement to secure our elections. Sadly, it won't be passed by this bunch of idiots in time for November. Maybe next year if we can overcome the non-citizen vote. You want non-citizens to vote, ear? The latest thing they're doing is mailing out tons of UOCAVA ballots to the non-military overseas population.

True The Vote is hardly the place where I'd go for accurate information about voting - 2000 Mules, anyone?
No, I don't want to see non-citizens vote, and I'm not sure why you are opposed to UOCAVA ballots. Shouldn't military and overseas government officials and their families have the right to vote?

And I realize texting sometimes makes comprehension a little vague. So I'll give you a little leeway there. The point is that they are trying to get as many NEW citizens on the roll as possible, so they are fast-tracking the process. Don't confuse me with a Harris voter.

I'm not sure what your last statement has to do with the former ones.

[flockofseagulls104]

Last time I checked, "bipartisan" meant that it was agreed upon by both sides. And Lankford is hardly a RINO.

Apparently, it wasn't bi-partisan enough, was it? Labeled 'bi-partisan' by the partisans.

Labeled by both sides. Lankford is hardly a RINO and he had the backing of Senate Republicans until Trump said it was a bad bill. He probably said that in order to ensure that immigration would be a hot topic for his campaign.

As for the SAVE Act, it is hardly necessary since it is already illegal for non-citizens to vote in federal elections, so another piece of legislation is unnecessary.

As if having a law would stop the swamp from anything. Who's being naive now, Kaye?

The SAVE Act has provisions to release non-citizen data so that the voter rolls can be purged of non-citizens. This data is currently held under lock and key by the feds. This data is a critical requirement to secure our elections. Sadly, it won't be passed by this bunch of idiots in time for November. Maybe next year if we can overcome the non-citizen vote. You want non-citizens to vote, ear? The latest thing they're doing is mailing out tons of UOCAVA ballots to the non-military overseas population.

True The Vote is hardly the place where I'd go for accurate information about voting - 2000 Mules, anyone?
No, I don't want to see non-citizens vote, and I'm not sure why you are opposed to UOCAVA ballots. Shouldn't military and overseas government officials and their families have the right to vote?

And I realize texting sometimes makes comprehension a little vague. So I'll give you a little leeway there. The point is that they are trying to get as many NEW citizens on the roll as possible, so they are fast-tracking the process. Don't confuse me with a Harris voter.

I'm not sure what your last statement has to do with the former ones.

In the past, expatriate citizens had to REQUEST an absentee ballot. As I understand it, they are now sending one to every one they can think of without being requested. (Just like they did in 2020).

2000 Mules has never been 'debunked'. Only proclaimed by TPTB and the media conglomerate to be. TTV never released the cellphone data, which I was upset about, but I'm sure they had legal issues with that. And so much more lawfare against them. So of course you regard them as a source you will disregard no matter what. You would rather rely on unsubstantiated proclamations by entities that have a lot to lose by the truth coming out.

I know it's hard for you to follow, but it is suspicious that all of a sudden we're in a rush to confirm new citizens to vote. Even through legal processes.

[earendel]

In the past, expatriate citizens had to REQUEST an absentee ballot. As I understand it, they are now sending one to every one they can think of without being requested. (Just like they did in 2020).

Do you really think that all of those expats are going to vote Democratic?

https://www.npr.org/2024/05/31/g-s1-229 ... pology2000 Mules has never been 'debunked'. Only proclaimed by TPTB and the media conglomerate to be. TTV never released the cellphone data, which I was upset about, but I'm sure they had legal issues with that. And so much more lawfare against them. So of course you regard them as a source you will disregard no matter what. You would rather rely on unsubstantiated proclamations by entities that have a lot to lose by the truth coming out. [/quote]
I could post a number of links that debunk "2000 Mules" but you'd dismiss them all as being "lamestream media".

I know it's hard for you to follow, but it is suspicious that all of a sudden we're in a rush to confirm new citizens to vote. Even through legal processes.

And you expect all of these naturalized citizens, grateful for the accelerated process, will vote Democratic?

[flockofseagulls104]

In the past, expatriate citizens had to REQUEST an absentee ballot. As I understand it, they are now sending one to every one they can think of without being requested. (Just like they did in 2020).
Do you really think that all of those expats are going to vote Democratic?

Do you really think the actual expat will be casting the vote?

I could post a number of links that debunk "2000 Mules" but you'd dismiss them all as being "lamestream media".

I would have liked to verify the claims myself, like I have done for many of the instances of election fraud. But I couldn't. I still have not seen any FACTS that debunk 2000 Mules. Only proclamations and contradictory claims. I don't KNOW if 2000 Mules is true. But I don't KNOW it's false. Neither do you. It's another case of one side is lying. I have personal experience how one side lies. So I have my opinion.

[earendel]

In the past, expatriate citizens had to REQUEST an absentee ballot. As I understand it, they are now sending one to every one they can think of without being requested. (Just like they did in 2020).
Do you really think that all of those expats are going to vote Democratic?

Do you really think the actual expat will be casting the vote?

Do you really think they won't? How about all the ballots sent to military personnel - should we question whether they are the ones really casting the vote? Or are you suggesting that the ballots are already pre-marked for the Democrats?

I could post a number of links that debunk "2000 Mules" but you'd dismiss them all as being "lamestream media".

I would have liked to verify the claims myself, like I have done for many of the instances of election fraud. But I couldn't. I still have not seen any FACTS that debunk 2000 Mules. Only proclamations and contradictory claims. I don't KNOW if 2000 Mules is true. But I don't KNOW it's false. Neither do you. It's another case of one side is lying. I have personal experience how one side lies. So I have my opinion.

As I said, there are a number of links to sites that show how the film was debunked - heck, True the Vote even pulled the film out of circulation, which certainly suggests that they knew it was bogus. That's not to say that voter fraud isn't an issue - I'm not naive enough to assume otherwise.

[flockofseagulls104]

In the past, expatriate citizens had to REQUEST an absentee ballot. As I understand it, they are now sending one to every one they can think of without being requested. (Just like they did in 2020).
Do you really think that all of those expats are going to vote Democratic?

Do you really think the actual expat will be casting the vote?

Do you really think they won't? How about all the ballots sent to military personnel - should we question whether they are the ones really casting the vote? Or are you suggesting that the ballots are already pre-marked for the Democrats?

I could post a number of links that debunk "2000 Mules" but you'd dismiss them all as being "lamestream media".

I would have liked to verify the claims myself, like I have done for many of the instances of election fraud. But I couldn't. I still have not seen any FACTS that debunk 2000 Mules. Only proclamations and contradictory claims. I don't KNOW if 2000 Mules is true. But I don't KNOW it's false. Neither do you. It's another case of one side is lying. I have personal experience how one side lies. So I have my opinion.

As I said, there are a number of links to sites that show how the film was debunked - heck, True the Vote even pulled the film out of circulation, which certainly suggests that they knew it was bogus. That's not to say that voter fraud isn't an issue - I'm not naive enough to assume otherwise.

I can't say for sure, other than to get more and more absentee ballots into the mix, why the administration is pursuing these unprecedented processes.

As per 2000 Mules, I have one word. LAWFARE.

[jarnon]

Yes, there are others who believe as you do, and X is just full of them. I have no doubt that she is sincere, but I suspect that there are others like her who don't share that viewpoint.

Like my friend Lindy Li, who’s Biden’s most ardent supporter.

My Socialism Nightmare: Chinese immigrant warns of dire socialism dangers in US

Wow. Her criticism of Bernie Sanders is right on. I have no idea how she cannot see how the cabal behind Harris is exactly the same as what Sanders stands for. How is Harris going to pay for Medicare for all, for price controls on food and housing. All of which are socialism. Does she not know that harris was brought up by a radical communist professor?

She confirms that the US is heading towards communism. How she can think that the democrat party is going to prevent that is beyond explanation. Especially when all the socialists and communists inhabit her party and when trump has emphatically declared that the US will never become socialist under his administration. Perhaps she has succumbed to the TDS in her party. She has lost her way.

Her winding path has led to a place I never expected.



Take heart, Flock. If Lindy, who loves Biden passionately, can be turned, SSS may be next.