Georgia on my mind

[flockofseagulls104]

DeKalb Republicans v Reffensperger.
Very detailed and specific evidence by two highly qualified cyber security experts on how vulnerable Raffensperger has left the GA election system even when he has known about it for years.

Will it be another of the 60 court cases that are dismissed because of legal technicalities, as was the only argument posed by the defense? We shall see if McAfee has any ethics or cajones. Stay tuned.

[BackInTex]

I'm not a citizen of Georgia, so what the GASOS does has no effect on my state.

Last I checked, Georgia has 16 electoral votes. They also get two senators and 14 representatives. How they vote and how they count those votes affects you and everyone in Kentucky, and every other state.

Yes, but because I am not a citizen of Georgia, I have no influence on what the GASOIS decides for their state. If it becomes an issue in Kentucky, then it becomes an issue for me.

Having no influence does not mean not subject to effect, or having skin in the game. Would you have the same que sera sera attitude if the GASOIS decided to double Republican votes?

[flockofseagulls104]

Closing statement today in DeKalb GOP v Raffensperger.

Some of the detailed testimony.

A bit more detailed than Ifonly's and BJ's arguments, I think. But the plaintiff's lawyer and the 3 witnesses today are probably just all stupid. Yeah, that's the ticket.

[earendel]

I trust that I have answered your question on that topic, although I believe you should be more interested in vote counting, because it is true: "It's not the people who vote that count, it's the people who count the votes." At the end of the day, people like me and you need to be able to count the votes and not rely on who is reporting the results to us. Right now, we do not have that situation. And those that count the votes, especially here in Georgia, are doing everything possible to prevent us from doing that. Trust, but verify!

Yes, you have, and I thank you. It isn't that I'm not interested in who counts the votes, but that isn't the issue here. That's another discussion.

[earendel]

Last I checked, Georgia has 16 electoral votes. They also get two senators and 14 representatives. How they vote and how they count those votes affects you and everyone in Kentucky, and every other state.

Yes, but because I am not a citizen of Georgia, I have no influence on what the GASOIS decides for their state. If it becomes an issue in Kentucky, then it becomes an issue for me.

Having no influence does not mean not subject to effect, or having skin in the game. Would you have the same que sera sera attitude if the GASOIS decided to double Republican votes?

Since I'm not a citizen of Georgia, I have no influence on that the board does or doesn't do, so getting riled up only upsets my digestion. My original question was over ballot counting, not vote counting, and flock has answered that.

[flockofseagulls104]

Yes, but because I am not a citizen of Georgia, I have no influence on what the GASOIS decides for their state. If it becomes an issue in Kentucky, then it becomes an issue for me.

Having no influence does not mean not subject to effect, or having skin in the game. Would you have the same que sera sera attitude if the GASOIS decided to double Republican votes?

Since I'm not a citizen of Georgia, I have no influence on that the board does or doesn't do, so getting riled up only upsets my digestion. My original question was over ballot counting, not vote counting, and flock has answered that.

Wouldn't want to upset your digestion over a stupid thing like the validity of this country's elections.

[earendel]

Having no influence does not mean not subject to effect, or having skin in the game. Would you have the same que sera sera attitude if the GASOIS decided to double Republican votes?

Since I'm not a citizen of Georgia, I have no influence on that the board does or doesn't do, so getting riled up only upsets my digestion. My original question was over ballot counting, not vote counting, and flock has answered that.

Wouldn't want to upset your digestion over a stupid thing like the validity of this country's elections.

One more time...what the GASOS does has nothing to do with the election in any other jurisdiction, so I don't feel the need to worry one way or the other. And, again, I'm distinguishing between ballot counting and vote counting. If this isn't clear enough, then feel free to think whatever you want. I've been given the information I requested, so I'm not going to belabor the issue any further.

[flockofseagulls104]

One more time...what the GASOS does has nothing to do with the election in any other jurisdiction, so I don't feel the need to worry one way or the other.

Ok Ear. Gotcha.

[flockofseagulls104]

From the Georgia State Election Board yesterday.

If you don't think it affects you, ear, you are part of the problem. You are getting information about what's going on in Georgia because I'm involved. If you don't think the same things are going on in Kentucky, or in any other state, you are sadly mistaken. WE have to protect the Constitution. The swamp is taking it away from us. Kamala is the swamp candidate.

[earendel]

From the Georgia State Election Board yesterday.

If you don't think it affects you, ear, you are part of the problem. You are getting information about what's going on in Georgia because I'm involved. If you don't think the same things are going on in Kentucky, or in any other state, you are sadly mistaken. WE have to protect the Constitution. The swamp is taking it away from us. Kamala is the swamp candidate.

I thought I had indicated that I was finished with this, but I have to reply to this. Is there vote fraud in Kentucky? Possibly, though given the redness of the commonwealth it's doubtful that anyone would bother to the extent that you believe it's happening in Georgia. The Kentucky Attorney-General's website lists 37 instances of voter fraud, most of them cases of buying votes. Considering that Trump won Kentucky by 554,172 votes, 37 instances of voter fraud is hardly worth worrying about. The total number of votes was 2,099,120, so the percentage of voter fraud is 0.0017. Once again, since I don't live in Georgia, there isn't anything I can do about what the GASOS does or doesn't do.

[flockofseagulls104]

The Kentucky Attorney-General's website lists 37 instances of voter fraud.

Kentucky uses the ES&S electronic voting system. Are the results reported by that system available for verification by the public, or do you just rely on your SOS and AG to tell you the results? If the latter, then you have a problem. And, BTW, those 37 fraudulent votes disenfranchised 74 legal, valid voters.

37 instances of voter fraud is hardly worth worrying about.

Maybe those instances that were found were not enough to change any results in Kentucky. But in 'battleground' states they represent a tiny fraction of the ones that have actually occured. And that is something for YOU to worry about. You want to lose the Constitution? Keep your head in the sand.

As Lucia accurately stated, just because you work for the State, and have a title of some sort, it does not automatically make you an 'expert'. There are thousands of people in the private sector that have much more experience, knowledge and common sense than the people that work for the counties and state. Go to unite4freedom.com and take a look at what the real experts have found. Maybe look at this. Or keep your head in the sand.

[flockofseagulls104]

Well voting has begun.

From 'my' side, our hope is that Trump's lead in the polls is much bigger than the media tells us. Which it generally is based on past performance of the polls. But the polls don't really matter, because of the other factors that the polls automatically dismiss or fail to take into account. These factors are not baseless, as they have been telling you for 4 years now, WITHOUT EVIDENCE.

We have seen evidence of the preparation for the 'manipulation' that has taken place in the past few elections. However, there is a limit of the amount of 'manipulation' that can be done before it becomes so obvious that even the media conglomerate cannot ignore it or sweep it under the rug. And the perpetrators know that we are watching this time.

The Harris campaign has no enthusiasm behind it. Just a lot of money. But then neither did biden. It will have to be 100 million votes my ass this time. And I don't think even booby will believe that.

[tlynn78]

Well voting has begun.

From 'my' side, our hope is that Trump's lead in the polls is much bigger than the media tells us. Which it generally is based on past performance of the polls. But the polls don't really matter, because of the other factors that the polls automatically dismiss or fail to take into account. These factors are not baseless, as they have been telling you for 4 years now, WITHOUT EVIDENCE.

We have seen evidence of the preparation for the 'manipulation' that has taken place in the past few elections. However, there is a limit of the amount of 'manipulation' that can be done before it becomes so obvious that even the media conglomerate cannot ignore it or sweep it under the rug. And the perpetrators know that we are watching this time.

The Harris campaign has no enthusiasm behind it. Just a lot of money. But then neither did biden. It will have to be 100 million votes my ass this time. And I don't think even booby will believe that.

Really?? He believed Biden was competent right up to the end - they will "believe" anything that supports their mindset.

[jarnon]

This is a disappointment to Flock: Two judges in Fulton County have blocked the State Election Board’s new rules.

FINAL ORDER

ORDER ON VARIOUS PENDING MOTIONS

ORDER GRANTING DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

the Court here DECLARES THAT THESE RULES ARE ILLEGAL, UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND VOID.

the Court hereby ENJOINS THE STATE OF GEORGIA AND THE SEB FROM ENFORCING, REQUIRING COMPLIANCE WITH, OR OTHERWISE UTILIZING SEB Rules 183-1-12.02(c.2), 183-1-12.12(.1)(6), 183-1-14-.02(18), 183-1-14-.02(19), 183-1-13-.05, 183-1-12-.21, and 183-1-12-.12(a)(5).

Additionally, the State and the SEB are hereby DIRECTED TO IMMEDIATELY REMOVE THESE RULES FROM THEIR ROLES AND OFFICIAL REPORTING AND TO IMMEDIATELY INFORM ALL STATE AND LOCAL ELECTION OFFICIALS THAT THESE RULES ARE VOID AND ARE NOT TO BE FOLLOWED THROUGH THE SAME MECHANISMS THAT THE SEB PROVIDED SUCH RULES TO THE STATE OR LOCAL ELECTION OFFICIALS OR THROUGH THE SAME MECHANISMS THAT THEY INFORMED THE STATE OR LOCAL ELECTION OFFICIALS OF THESE RULES.

Overuse of capitals and boldface could be a symptom of TDS.

To users of common parlance, “shall” connotes instruction or command: You shall not pass!

Stephen Colbert loves this quote.

[kroxquo]

This is a disappointment to Flock: Two judges in Fulton County have blocked the State Election Board’s new rules.

ORDER ON VARIOUS PENDING MOTIONS

ORDER GRANTING DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

the Court here DECLARES THAT THESE RULES ARE ILLEGAL, UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND VOID.

the Court hereby ENJOINS THE STATE OF GEORGIA AND THE SEB FROM ENFORCING, REQUIRING COMPLIANCE WITH, OR OTHERWISE UTILIZING SEB Rules 183-1-12.02(c.2), 183-1-12.12(.1)(6), 183-1-14-.02(18), 183-1-14-.02(19), 183-1-13-.05, 183-1-12-.21, and 183-1-12-.12(a)(5).

Additionally, the State and the SEB are hereby DIRECTED TO IMMEDIATELY REMOVE THESE RULES FROM THEIR ROLES AND OFFICIAL REPORTING AND TO IMMEDIATELY INFORM ALL STATE AND LOCAL ELECTION OFFICIALS THAT THESE RULES ARE VOID AND ARE NOT TO BE FOLLOWED THROUGH THE SAME MECHANISMS THAT THE SEB PROVIDED SUCH RULES TO THE STATE OR LOCAL ELECTION OFFICIALS OR THROUGH THE SAME MECHANISMS THAT THEY INFORMED THE STATE OR LOCAL ELECTION OFFICIALS OF THESE RULES.

Overuse of capitals and boldface could be a symptom of TDS.

[Sarcasm Font] This is just the Swamp protecting its own. [Sarcasm Font]

[flockofseagulls104]

This is a disappointment to Flock: Two judges in Fulton County have blocked the State Election Board’s new rules.

ORDER ON VARIOUS PENDING MOTIONS

ORDER GRANTING DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

the Court here DECLARES THAT THESE RULES ARE ILLEGAL, UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND VOID.

the Court hereby ENJOINS THE STATE OF GEORGIA AND THE SEB FROM ENFORCING, REQUIRING COMPLIANCE WITH, OR OTHERWISE UTILIZING SEB Rules 183-1-12.02(c.2), 183-1-12.12(.1)(6), 183-1-14-.02(18), 183-1-14-.02(19), 183-1-13-.05, 183-1-12-.21, and 183-1-12-.12(a)(5).

Additionally, the State and the SEB are hereby DIRECTED TO IMMEDIATELY REMOVE THESE RULES FROM THEIR ROLES AND OFFICIAL REPORTING AND TO IMMEDIATELY INFORM ALL STATE AND LOCAL ELECTION OFFICIALS THAT THESE RULES ARE VOID AND ARE NOT TO BE FOLLOWED THROUGH THE SAME MECHANISMS THAT THE SEB PROVIDED SUCH RULES TO THE STATE OR LOCAL ELECTION OFFICIALS OR THROUGH THE SAME MECHANISMS THAT THEY INFORMED THE STATE OR LOCAL ELECTION OFFICIALS OF THESE RULES.

Overuse of capitals and boldface could be a symptom of TDS.

[Sarcasm Font] This is just the Swamp protecting its own. [Sarcasm Font]

No sarcasm needed. It is exactly that. One low-level county judge making his own law. Where has this happened before? He will be overturned, but he's bought enough time. That's what it is about.