Forsyth, Montana VS Dearborn, Michigan

[flockofseagulls104]

No. I believe that Trump spoke his mind on the situation when asked for his opinion on the situation, trying to be fair by pointing out there were normal civilized people who had opinions on both sides of the issue in question. And that these people had nothing to do with the violence that ensued. It came out wrong. You know the feeling, don't you, SSS? You have no proof that his statement was false except for the ABSENCE of information. Do you have a list of every person that was there? Do you know the motives of every person who showed up that day? Of course, you don't. Neither did Trump. But he made an assumption based on the situation that NOBODY CAN PROVE was correct or incorrect. At best it was a throwaway comment. But that doesn't matter to you, does it? And also, of course, you know the mind and motives of everyone, so you use your unique skill on Trump, just like you do everyone on this bored.

And it's the fact that you can't look at any situation that has to do with this one guy that you hate with any kind of rational thought, even to the point of incredible hypocrisy on your part, that makes what you post here have no credibility.

When the ubiquitous media rampage erupted, he clarified his statement succinctly and categorically. But diehard TDS sufferers didn't care. Neither do you. You have a narrative to uphold.

It's funny how the only person who sounds deranged in these threads is Flock.

Your capacity for self-delusion is impressive.

Standard answer. I'm stupid, oh, sorry, deranged this time. I guess I can add that to my signature. If it's not already there. I lose track.