Page 2 of 2
Re: Trump's recent speech in Iowa
Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2023 9:59 pm
by flockofseagulls104
silverscreenselect wrote: ↑Thu Nov 02, 2023 8:50 pm
flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 02, 2023 8:38 pm
So when are you going to get around to talking about how your party supports nazism?
When you provide one bit of evidence about it.
Do it yourself. Look outside your bubble. It's everywhere out here in the real world.
Re: Trump's recent speech in Iowa
Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2023 10:17 pm
by silverscreenselect
flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 02, 2023 9:59 pm
silverscreenselect wrote: ↑Thu Nov 02, 2023 8:50 pm
flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 02, 2023 8:38 pm
So when are you going to get around to talking about how your party supports nazism?
When you provide one bit of evidence about it.
Do it yourself. Look outside your bubble. It's everywhere out here in the real world.
Translation: He has no evidence and is too embarrassed to admit it so he deflects it by asking me to go on a wild goose chase to find something to prove his claim.
Re: Trump's recent speech in Iowa
Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2023 5:04 am
by Pastor Fireball
flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2023 11:21 am
Let's not think about the FACT that they are using our tax dollars in their never-ending, desperate quest to remove their opposition.
Every poll shows that the easiest way that President Biden wins re-election is if Former Guy is the GOP nominee. And you seriously sit there with a straight face and tell us that President Biden wants to "remove" his weakest "opposition" so that he can lose in next year's general election to Coronavirus DeathSantis? Are you high?
Re: Trump's recent speech in Iowa
Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2023 9:35 am
by flockofseagulls104
silverscreenselect wrote: ↑Thu Nov 02, 2023 10:17 pm
flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 02, 2023 9:59 pm
silverscreenselect wrote: ↑Thu Nov 02, 2023 8:50 pm
When you provide one bit of evidence about it.
Do it yourself. Look outside your bubble. It's everywhere out here in the real world.
Translation: He has no evidence and is too embarrassed to admit it so he deflects it by asking me to go on a wild goose chase to find something to prove his claim.
When have you ever recognized any evidence that contradicts you? My evidence is always tainted to you. But I can never convince you to venture out of your echo chamber and explore other perspectives on your own. You desperately cling to your willful ignorance and disdain of anything that contradicts the narrative you have been told to adopt out of 'virtuousness'. And there are unfortunately so many just like you.
https://kion546.com/news/2023/11/02/loc ... -language/
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/10/3 ... s-00124346
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/10/2 ... s-00123875
https://www.npr.org/2023/10/14/12058096 ... statements
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/rest ... -palestine
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/se ... r-AA1jgXOY
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... ttack.html
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/ ... r-AA1idYyz
Re: Trump's recent speech in Iowa
Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2023 10:07 am
by silverscreenselect
I didn't see any reference to Nazis or use of the swastika or other symbols, such as frequently show up at Trump rallies. I saw one member of Congress, Rashida Tlaib, (who is a first term freshman) whose priorities are definitely out of whack, which is a far cry from saying that the Democratic Party as a whole supports Hamas or Nazis. I've seen far more Republicans expressing support for the January 6 insurrectionists who stormed the Capitol. I saw efforts by Democrats in Congress to draw distinctions between concern for the Palestinian civilians and support for Hamas. Figuring out how to get humanitarian aid into Gaza without allowing Hamas to regroup and rearm is difficult.
Figuring out how to proceed in this war will be difficult for Israel and the US because Hamas is quite willing to use thousands of Palestinian civilians as hostages. The US and Israel can't ignore these civilian deaths, and Biden is doing a good job of threading the needle right now, certainly better than the ham-handed Trump would have done.
Re: Trump's recent speech in Iowa
Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2023 10:11 am
by flockofseagulls104
silverscreenselect wrote: ↑Fri Nov 03, 2023 10:07 am
I didn't see any reference to Nazis or use of the swastika or other symbols, such as frequently show up at Trump rallies. I saw one member of Congress, Rashida Tlaib, (who is a first term freshman) whose priorities are definitely out of whack, which is a far cry from saying that the Democratic Party as a whole supports Hamas or Nazis. I've seen far more Republicans expressing support for the January 6 insurrectionists who stormed the Capitol. I saw efforts by Democrats in Congress to draw distinctions between concern for the Palestinian civilians and support for Hamas. Figuring out how to get humanitarian aid into Gaza without allowing Hamas to regroup and rearm is difficult.
Figuring out how to proceed in this war will be difficult for Israel and the US because Hamas is quite willing to use thousands of Palestinian civilians as hostages. The US and Israel can't ignore these civilian deaths, and Biden is doing a good job of threading the needle right now, certainly better than the ham-handed Trump would have done.
You are, as I knew from the start. beyond any hope. Ignore my preface and go after trump. You had no time to even glance at the links I posted, much less to do any thinking about them.
Re: Trump's recent speech in Iowa
Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2023 7:53 pm
by wbtravis007
flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 03, 2023 10:11 am
silverscreenselect wrote: ↑Fri Nov 03, 2023 10:07 am
I didn't see any reference to Nazis or use of the swastika or other symbols, such as frequently show up at Trump rallies. I saw one member of Congress, Rashida Tlaib, (who is a first term freshman) whose priorities are definitely out of whack, which is a far cry from saying that the Democratic Party as a whole supports Hamas or Nazis. I've seen far more Republicans expressing support for the January 6 insurrectionists who stormed the Capitol. I saw efforts by Democrats in Congress to draw distinctions between concern for the Palestinian civilians and support for Hamas. Figuring out how to get humanitarian aid into Gaza without allowing Hamas to regroup and rearm is difficult.
Figuring out how to proceed in this war will be difficult for Israel and the US because Hamas is quite willing to use thousands of Palestinian civilians as hostages. The US and Israel can't ignore these civilian deaths, and Biden is doing a good job of threading the needle right now, certainly better than the ham-handed Trump would have done.
You are, as I knew from the start. beyond any hope. Ignore my preface and go after trump. You had no time to even glance at the links I posted, much less to do any thinking about them.
What is the “preface” that you’re suggesting he ignored?
Re: Trump's recent speech in Iowa
Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2023 9:34 pm
by flockofseagulls104
wbtravis007 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 03, 2023 7:53 pm
flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 03, 2023 10:11 am
silverscreenselect wrote: ↑Fri Nov 03, 2023 10:07 am
I didn't see any reference to Nazis or use of the swastika or other symbols, such as frequently show up at Trump rallies. I saw one member of Congress, Rashida Tlaib, (who is a first term freshman) whose priorities are definitely out of whack, which is a far cry from saying that the Democratic Party as a whole supports Hamas or Nazis. I've seen far more Republicans expressing support for the January 6 insurrectionists who stormed the Capitol. I saw efforts by Democrats in Congress to draw distinctions between concern for the Palestinian civilians and support for Hamas. Figuring out how to get humanitarian aid into Gaza without allowing Hamas to regroup and rearm is difficult.
Figuring out how to proceed in this war will be difficult for Israel and the US because Hamas is quite willing to use thousands of Palestinian civilians as hostages. The US and Israel can't ignore these civilian deaths, and Biden is doing a good job of threading the needle right now, certainly better than the ham-handed Trump would have done.
You are, as I knew from the start. beyond any hope. Ignore my preface and go after trump. You had no time to even glance at the links I posted, much less to do any thinking about them.
What is the “preface” that you’re suggesting he ignored?
You don't read anything either, you just react. Maybe you could take some time to read it and tell me.
Re: Trump's recent speech in Iowa
Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2023 10:19 pm
by wbtravis007
flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 03, 2023 9:34 pm
wbtravis007 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 03, 2023 7:53 pm
flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 03, 2023 10:11 am
You are, as I knew from the start. beyond any hope. Ignore my preface and go after trump. You had no time to even glance at the links I posted, much less to do any thinking about them.
What is the “preface” that you’re suggesting he ignored?
You don't read anything either, you just react. Maybe you could take some time to read it and tell me.
I already tried to understand what you meant and couldn’t. That’s why I asked the question.
If you can’t explain it, maybe someone else can.
I doubt it, though.
Re: Trump's recent speech in Iowa
Posted: Sat Nov 04, 2023 8:21 pm
by flockofseagulls104
wbtravis007 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 03, 2023 10:19 pm
flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 03, 2023 9:34 pm
wbtravis007 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 03, 2023 7:53 pm
What is the “preface” that you’re suggesting he ignored?
You don't read anything either, you just react. Maybe you could take some time to read it and tell me.
I already tried to understand what you meant and couldn’t. That’s why I asked the question.
If you can’t explain it, maybe someone else can.
I doubt it, though.
I've never noticed you even trying to comprehend anything in the past, anyway. You usually just add inane and stupid comments in an attempt, I suppose, to appear clever. This must be new to you. Maybe if you concentrate.
Re: Trump's recent speech in Iowa
Posted: Sun Nov 05, 2023 9:03 am
by wbtravis007
flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 04, 2023 8:21 pm
wbtravis007 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 03, 2023 10:19 pm
flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 03, 2023 9:34 pm
You don't read anything either, you just react. Maybe you could take some time to read it and tell me.
I already tried to understand what you meant and couldn’t. That’s why I asked the question.
If you can’t explain it, maybe someone else can.
I doubt it, though.
I've never noticed you even trying to comprehend anything in the past, anyway. You usually just add inane and stupid comments in an attempt, I suppose, to appear clever. This must be new to you. Maybe if you concentrate.
You ignored my preface. As usual. Because you’re [blah, blah, blah, blah, blah]. And you always [blah, blah …]. You should [blah, blah …].
And you’re such a meanie!
Wah wah wah.
Re: Trump's recent speech in Iowa
Posted: Sun Nov 05, 2023 5:55 pm
by flockofseagulls104
wbtravis007 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 05, 2023 9:03 am
flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 04, 2023 8:21 pm
wbtravis007 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 03, 2023 10:19 pm
I already tried to understand what you meant and couldn’t. That’s why I asked the question.
If you can’t explain it, maybe someone else can.
I doubt it, though.
I've never noticed you even trying to comprehend anything in the past, anyway. You usually just add inane and stupid comments in an attempt, I suppose, to appear clever. This must be new to you. Maybe if you concentrate.
You ignored my preface. As usual. Because you’re [blah, blah, blah, blah, blah]. And you always [blah, blah …]. You should [blah, blah …].
And you’re such a meanie!
Wah wah wah.
How clever of you.