If it's going to get the Bored heated, then take it here PLEASE.
-
BackInTex
- Posts: 13941
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:43 pm
- Location: In Texas of course!
#1
Post
by BackInTex » Mon Jun 29, 2026 8:23 am
Kudos to Gavin Newsom
Note: you feel faint and lightheaded after hearing shocking news, immediately sit down with your head between your knees or lie down with your legs elevated. This posture helps restore blood flow to your brain and prevents a full loss of consciousness.
California cracks down on loud streaming ads under new state law
SB 576 extends a federal broadcast and cable TV rule from 2010 to the streaming era
Starting this Wednesday, July 1, streaming platforms serving California consumers will be barred from running commercials at a higher volume than the shows, movies or other video content they interrupt.
The bill, SB 576, was signed into law last October by Gov. Gavin Newsom and extends a long-running television rule to the streaming era.
Federal law already requires commercials on broadcast and cable television to match the average volume of the programming they accompany under the 2010 Commercial Advertisement Loudness Mitigation Act.
..what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? let them take arms.
~~ Thomas Jefferson
War is where the government tells you who the bad guy is.
Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
-- Benjamin Franklin (maybe)
-
elwoodblues
- Posts: 4019
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 2:36 pm
- Location: Texas
#2
Post
by elwoodblues » Mon Jun 29, 2026 6:14 pm
I will vote for whoever does away with that rule to start extra innings with a runner on second.
-
Beebs52
- Queen of Wack
- Posts: 16978
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:38 am
- Location: Location.Location.Location
#3
Post
by Beebs52 » Mon Jun 29, 2026 7:18 pm
I will agree with those things approved and proposed.
Well, then
-
BackInTex
- Posts: 13941
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:43 pm
- Location: In Texas of course!
#4
Post
by BackInTex » Tue Jun 30, 2026 8:29 am
elwoodblues wrote: ↑Mon Jun 29, 2026 6:14 pm
I will vote for whoever does away with that rule to start extra innings with a runner on second.
Hear hear!
..what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? let them take arms.
~~ Thomas Jefferson
War is where the government tells you who the bad guy is.
Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
-- Benjamin Franklin (maybe)
-
kroxquo
- Posts: 3458
- Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 12:24 pm
- Location: On the Road to Kingdom Come
-
Contact:
#5
Post
by kroxquo » Tue Jun 30, 2026 9:53 am
Beebs52 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 29, 2026 7:18 pm
I will agree with those things approved and proposed.
And also ends PK shoot outs as a way to decide tied soccer matches.
You live and learn. Or at least you live. - Douglas Adams
-
BackInTex
- Posts: 13941
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:43 pm
- Location: In Texas of course!
#6
Post
by BackInTex » Tue Jun 30, 2026 10:38 am
kroxquo wrote: ↑Tue Jun 30, 2026 9:53 am
Beebs52 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 29, 2026 7:18 pm
I will agree with those things approved and proposed.
And also ends PK shoot outs as a way to decide tied soccer matches.
Yes! Should be sudden death. First team to score wins.
..what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? let them take arms.
~~ Thomas Jefferson
War is where the government tells you who the bad guy is.
Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
-- Benjamin Franklin (maybe)
-
silverscreenselect
- Posts: 25152
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
-
Contact:
#7
Post
by silverscreenselect » Tue Jun 30, 2026 10:45 am
BackInTex wrote: ↑Tue Jun 30, 2026 10:38 am
kroxquo wrote: ↑Tue Jun 30, 2026 9:53 am
Beebs52 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 29, 2026 7:18 pm
I will agree with those things approved and proposed.
And also ends PK shoot outs as a way to decide tied soccer matches.
Yes! Should be sudden death. First team to score wins.
They have a 30-minute overtime in knockout games, divided into two 15-minute halves where they reverse ends of the field. However, that overtime is like a basketball overtime. It's not sudden death, but most total goals in the 30 minutes. So, occasionally both teams will score a goal in the 30 minutes and the game will still go to penalty kicks.
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com
-
Appa23
- Posts: 3780
- Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:04 pm
#8
Post
by Appa23 » Tue Jun 30, 2026 11:16 am
kroxquo wrote: ↑Tue Jun 30, 2026 9:53 am
Beebs52 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 29, 2026 7:18 pm
I will agree with those things approved and proposed.
And also ends PK shoot outs as a way to decide tied soccer matches.
As a former specialist at PKs, i rebuke this heresy!
-
Vandal
- Director of Promos
- Posts: 7768
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:42 pm
- Location: Literary Circles
-
Contact:
#9
Post
by Vandal » Tue Jun 30, 2026 2:21 pm
Can we get a law that makes the volume on streaming service programs equal for both music and dialogue. Too many times I have to turn it up to hear them speak, only to be blasted by soundtrack. A bit of equalization would be ideal.
-
Beebs52
- Queen of Wack
- Posts: 16978
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:38 am
- Location: Location.Location.Location
#10
Post
by Beebs52 » Tue Jun 30, 2026 3:40 pm
Vandal wrote: ↑Tue Jun 30, 2026 2:21 pm
Can we get a law that makes the volume on streaming service programs equal for both music and dialogue. Too many times I have to turn it up to hear them speak, only to be blasted by soundtrack. A bit of equalization would be ideal.
Yes. Add to proposed list.
Well, then
-
mrkelley23
- Posts: 6714
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:48 pm
- Location: Somewhere between Bureaucracy and Despair
#11
Post
by mrkelley23 » Tue Jun 30, 2026 3:43 pm
Wouldn't it be great if we could get politicians to enact things that 90% of people agree on?
For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled. -- Richard Feynman
-
BackInTex
- Posts: 13941
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:43 pm
- Location: In Texas of course!
#12
Post
by BackInTex » Tue Jun 30, 2026 4:02 pm
mrkelley23 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 30, 2026 3:43 pm
Wouldn't it be great if we could get politicians to enact things that 90% of people agree on?
That would really drive down the number of new laws and regulations. i'm al for it.

..what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? let them take arms.
~~ Thomas Jefferson
War is where the government tells you who the bad guy is.
Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
-- Benjamin Franklin (maybe)