Bondi out

[jarnon]

The first year of Trump’s second term saw uncharacteristically few personnel shake-ups. That changed this year as Attorney General Pam Bondi is the second top official to be fired.

Bondi hasn’t attracted as much controversy as Kristi Noem or Kash Patel (still the FBI director) so I don’t know why she’s been forced out. Former Trump attorney Todd Blanche is filling in for now.

[flockofseagulls104]

The first year of Trump’s second term saw uncharacteristically few personnel shake-ups. That changed this year as Attorney General Pam Bondi is the second top official to be fired.

Bondi hasn’t attracted as much controversy as Kristi Noem or Kash Patel (still the FBI director) so I don’t know why she’s been forced out. Former Trump attorney Todd Blanche is filling in for now.

I think it's about time. She has been dragging her feet on holding ANYONE accountable for the innumerable crimes perpetrated by the democrat and swamp political operatives.

[silverscreenselect]

It's always good news when one of Trump's cabinet officials leaves. The bad news is that they're usually replaced by somebody worse.

Bondi wasn't too swift on releasing Epstein material, but her biggest failing in Trump's eyes was failing to get convictions against people like James Comey. Of course, the fact that there wasn't any evidence against Comey never entered Trump's mind.

[Weyoun]

Her first failure was not finding enough invented crimes to prosecute Trump’s enemies. While whitefailure will bemoan that, ultimately, you can’t just make up laws or evidence because you don’t like someone.

Her second failure was not finding some way to whitewash Trump of his involvement in pedophilia.

Presumably, Trump believes her replacement will be better at those two awful things. So it’s nothing to be happy or excited about.

It’s interesting, but also not surprising, that Trump went after two women in his administration first. It’s not like that walking bottle of vodka we have at the Department of Defense is doing great right now.

[BackInTex]

osecute Trump’s enemies. While whitefailure will bemoan that, ultimately, you can’t just make up laws or evidence because you don’t like someone.

Her second failure was not finding some way to whitewash Trump of his involvement in pedophilia.

Nothing there to whitewash. Nothing credible, anyway. More eveidence he wasn't involved.

[flockofseagulls104]

...ultimately, you can’t just make up laws or evidence because you don’t like someone.

OMG! You do finally get it! Bondi's out because she would not hold a single one of the innumerable people accountable for doing just that for the past 8 years because they hate Trump.

[Weyoun]

osecute Trump’s enemies. While whitefailure will bemoan that, ultimately, you can’t just make up laws or evidence because you don’t like someone.

Her second failure was not finding some way to whitewash Trump of his involvement in pedophilia.

Nothing there to whitewash. Nothing credible, anyway. More eveidence he wasn't involved.

The best that you could say is that we actually don’t know, because all the information is not fully out there. Not even remotely.

But why is that? I would submit that the reason the information is not fully out there is that the guy controlling the information is implicated by the information?

Anyway, he doesn’t seem to have been happy with that, so she’s out of a job. Again, totally not suspicious.

[Weyoun]

...ultimately, you can’t just make up laws or evidence because you don’t like someone.

OMG! You do finally get it! Bondi's out because she would not hold a single one of the innumerable people accountable for doing just that for the past 8 years because they hate Trump.

No, she tried and hilariously failed. Now granted, there is a competence issue, because all these people are dumbasses. We’re seeing that with the war right now.

But you would think something would stick, right?

One thing I’ve noticed about online morons like yourself is that you just think that people can be prosecuted because you don’t like them. Like Anthony Fauci actually has to have violated the law before you can indict him. Hillary Clinton needs to have violated a law before you can indict her. I was told that Robert Mueller should’ve been indicted as well, again I assumed because he didn’t like Trump.

What lil twats like yourself never managed to do is show me an actual statute that these people have violated.

On the other hand, these people that you are so worried were cruelly prosecuted by Biden seemed to have done something wrong, since folks found a law that they broke, were prosecuted for it, and juries found them guilty. This is a telling, important distinction.

[BackInTex]

The best that you could say is that we actually don’t know, because all the information is not fully out there. Not even remotely.

But why is that? I would submit that the reason the information is not fully out there is that the guy controlling the information is implicated by the information?

By that logic (something you are woefully terrible at) Joe Biden is more complicit in the whole Epstein thing than anyone.

[Weyoun]

The best that you could say is that we actually don’t know, because all the information is not fully out there. Not even remotely.

But why is that? I would submit that the reason the information is not fully out there is that the guy controlling the information is implicated by the information?

By that logic (something you are woefully terrible at) Joe Biden is more complicit in the whole Epstein thing than anyone.

It’s a common misstatement by those who get their news exclusively online that Biden could have released those files earlier. There was still an active criminal case going on.

Anyway, if Trump wasn’t involved, the whole lot of information would’ve been released a long time ago to exonerate him and embarrass his opponents. But that didn’t happen.