Let it speak for itself

[tlynn78]

Wb, are you, like, on something? Or what.

They do tend to OD on their Flock infatuation. Flockfatuation, if you will.

[silverscreenselect]

New billboard outside Mar-a-Lago, courtesy of George Conway:

[silverscreenselect]

At his rally in the Bronx this week, Trump claimed that the unnamed Toughest Business People in the world asked him:

“‘How do you get up in the morning and put your pants on? Why do you put those pants on?’ ‘I’ll explain it to you someday’ ‘How do you do it? How do you get up? How?’”

In four years, Trump has regressed from bragging that he passed the dementia test to bragging that he puts his pants on by himself.

[flockofseagulls104]

At his rally in the Bronx this week, Trump claimed that the unnamed Toughest Business People in the world asked him:

“‘How do you get up in the morning and put your pants on? Why do you put those pants on?’ ‘I’ll explain it to you someday’ ‘How do you do it? How do you get up? How?’”

In four years, Trump has regressed from bragging that he passed the dementia test to bragging that he puts his pants on by himself.

Maybe you will be as shocked as these MSLSD reporters on what's really happening.

You seem to put your pants on over your head. Go drink some bleach.

[silverscreenselect]

Maybe you will be as shocked as these MSLSD reporters on what's really happening.

You seem to put your pants on over your head. Go drink some bleach.

Here's a crowd shot at the Bronx rally:



Notice the overwhelmingly white faces in the crowd, not what you will usually find in a park in the Bronx. And the crowd size was closer to 1,000, and that's with free musical performances to draw people in. The organizers had a permit for 3,500 people maximum but didn't come close.

[flockofseagulls104]

Nice of you to re-post the 'expert' analysis. You didn't even bother to watch the MSLSD video where she refutes your cherry-picked racist photo much to her personal chagrin.

The Secret Service only allowed so many people into the secured area. I guess all the other sources that estimated at least 20,000-25,000 people there that wanted to get in were lying.

You are so pathetic.

[silverscreenselect]

Nice of you to re-post the 'expert' analysis. You didn't even bother to watch the MSLSD video where she refutes your cherry-picked racist photo much to her personal chagrin.

There are a whole bunch of similar photos to choose from. I happened to pick one that actually came from a pro-Trump website, The National Pulse.

[flockofseagulls104]

Maybe you can spell out the point you want to make in plain English so we can see where your mind is, instead of relying on the ubiquitous propaganda on the net.

Also, maybe actually address the points I make using plain English.

BTW, there were only 2 Secret Service stations set up (Probably limited by the local powers that be). And they were limited to having 3500 or so in the area they were allowed. That photo and its interpretation that you have given no thought to further disseminating is complete bullshit. Many thousands of people were not allowed in that area, but the speaker system was good enough so those outside could hear it

[flockofseagulls104]

This is an insignificant point to people with rational minds. I don't really care how many people attended the Bronx rally. But I do know it's 1000%+ the amount of people who would attend a Biden rally, if he ever had one. And I do know for a fact the size of crowds that have attended the Trump rallies that I have attended. But I post it here for the benefit of those here who don't have a rational, thinking mind.



1. Photo #1 has been widely disseminated on the internet as ‘proof’ that Trump is lying about the crowd size at the Bronx NY Rally.
2. Photo #2 is a picture of the crowd at the same rally waiting to get processed at the Secret Service stations that any people allowed into the cordoned area must go through. Notice the TWO tents.
3. There doesn’t seem to be any tents shown in photo #1 So the people waiting to get into the cordoned area do not appear in photo #1.
4. Photo #2 shows a large amount of people in a small area. Cortona Park in the Bronx is a fairly large park. But I can find no overhead photos of the rest of the park on that day. It is fair to deduce there were more people outside the cordoned area than is shown in this photo that weren’t in this photo but were in attendance.
5. Conclusion: The people disseminating Photo #1 and claiming it is proof that Trump lies are either not doing any critical thinking about what they are communicating, or they are actively spreading false propaganda in an attempt to disparage President Trump. (Oh My God, NOOO! No one would ever do that!!) For those with fair minds – please extrapolate.

Trollboy, I don't think you are actually stupid, but you seem to be determined to portray yourself that way on this bored.

[silverscreenselect]

2. Photo #2 is a picture of the crowd at the same rally waiting to get processed at the Secret Service stations that any people allowed into the cordoned area must go through. Notice the TWO tents.

Or that Photo 2 was taken well before Photo 1 and showed the same number of people in a narrow line waiting to go through security. Once they went through security and spread out, you had Photo 1. It's like a mostly empty stadium with one concession stand open. At halftime, you've got a long line at that concession stand, but not all that many people in the stands.

And I'm waiting for Flock to comment on the rousing reception Trump got at the Libertarian reception yesterday.

[flockofseagulls104]

2. Photo #2 is a picture of the crowd at the same rally waiting to get processed at the Secret Service stations that any people allowed into the cordoned area must go through. Notice the TWO tents.

Or that Photo 2 was taken well before Photo 1 and showed the same number of people in a narrow line waiting to go through security. Once they went through security and spread out, you had Photo 1. It's like a mostly empty stadium with one concession stand open. At halftime, you've got a long line at that concession stand, but not all that many people in the stands.

And I'm waiting for Flock to comment on the rousing reception Trump got at the Libertarian reception yesterday.

The point is, trollboy, your picture is not proof of ANYTHING, yet you posted it as proof.

Trump had the cajones to go to the Libertarian Party function. Biden was invited but surprisingly didn't.
Many Liberatarians are for RFK Jr. Of course there are going to be people who don't like him. But, if you go to the end of his speech, he seems to have won most of them over.

[flockofseagulls104]

Oh, it's a conspiracy theory that the democrats want Trump assassinated...

[flockofseagulls104]

And you keep trusting THEM?

Now that it's 'verified' (like it wasn't before...) what do you think they're going to do?

Spoiler

Go on to the next attack on us and Trump, what else? Just like the usual suspects on this bored will do.

[silverscreenselect]

And you keep trusting THEM?

Now that it's 'verified' (like it wasn't before...) what do you think they're going to do?

Spoiler

Go on to the next attack on us and Trump, what else? Just like the usual suspects on this bored will do.

I've never said the laptop wasn't real. What I've said was that the emails that were circulated in 2020 about the "Biden crime family" hadn't been verified. They still haven't. The prosecution has used the laptop to introduce other emails in which Hunter Biden admits to his drug use, something that has no bearing on what Rudy Giuliani was promoting in 2020. And the laptop was admitted into evidence over the defense's motion to suppress, with the judge saying the defense hadn't shown the laptop hadn't been tampered with. This will be one of the grounds for appeal if Biden is convicted.

[tlynn78]

And you keep trusting THEM?

Now that it's 'verified' (like it wasn't before...) what do you think they're going to do?

Spoiler

Go on to the next attack on us and Trump, what else? Just like the usual suspects on this bored will do.

I've never said the laptop wasn't real. What I've said was that the emails that were circulated in 2020 about the "Biden crime family" hadn't been verified. They still haven't. The prosecution has used the laptop to introduce other emails in which Hunter Biden admits to his drug use, something that has no bearing on what Rudy Giuliani was promoting in 2020. And the laptop was admitted into evidence over the defense's motion to suppress, with the judge saying the defense hadn't shown the laptop hadn't been tampered with. This will be one of the grounds for appeal if Biden is convicted.

Gee, too bad I didn't take your over/under on if "Hunter Biden's laptop is a Russian hoax."

[flockofseagulls104]

And you keep trusting THEM?

Now that it's 'verified' (like it wasn't before...) what do you think they're going to do?

Spoiler

Go on to the next attack on us and Trump, what else? Just like the usual suspects on this bored will do.

I've never said the laptop wasn't real. What I've said was that the emails that were circulated in 2020 about the "Biden crime family" hadn't been verified. They still haven't. The prosecution has used the laptop to introduce other emails in which Hunter Biden admits to his drug use, something that has no bearing on what Rudy Giuliani was promoting in 2020. And the laptop was admitted into evidence over the defense's motion to suppress, with the judge saying the defense hadn't shown the laptop hadn't been tampered with. This will be one of the grounds for appeal if Biden is convicted.

OMG. The defense wanted to suppress the evidence that was damaging to their case? You heard it here! Trollboy says that is grounds for appeal for Hunter.
Yet Trump has no grounds for appeal in his staged and manipulated cases.

So it is verified beyond question what kind of scum Hunter Biden was, yet you will dismiss that and continue accusing Trump of obviously manufactured 'crimes' no one has ever been charged with, much less convicted of.

Even after watching Leslie Stahl displaying the full extent of the MSM's election interference. If the MSM had done their job, none of this would be occurring, because Trump would be President. Just imagine, trollboy, if the MSM had reported the truth, you'd only have a few more months, then no Trump. Then you could go on to your next obsession.

How do you sleep at night?

[flockofseagulls104]

And Trump faces jail time because of a bookkeeping entry?

Here's just a small collection of the SWAMP DISINFORMATION.
(They can do it so much more effectively than the russians)

How do you keep your hypocrisies straight?

[wbtravis007]

And you keep trusting THEM?

Now that it's 'verified' (like it wasn't before...) what do you think they're going to do?

Spoiler

Go on to the next attack on us and Trump, what else? Just like the usual suspects on this bored will do.

I've never said the laptop wasn't real. What I've said was that the emails that were circulated in 2020 about the "Biden crime family" hadn't been verified. They still haven't. The prosecution has used the laptop to introduce other emails in which Hunter Biden admits to his drug use, something that has no bearing on what Rudy Giuliani was promoting in 2020. And the laptop was admitted into evidence over the defense's motion to suppress, with the judge saying the defense hadn't shown the laptop hadn't been tampered with. This will be one of the grounds for appeal if Biden is convicted.

Gee, too bad I didn't take your over/under on if "Hunter Biden's laptop is a Russian hoax."

Never heard of anybody taking somebody’s over/under.

I’m sure it can be fun, though.

[silverscreenselect]

So it is verified beyond question what kind of scum Hunter Biden was, yet you will dismiss that and continue accusing Trump of obviously manufactured 'crimes' no one has ever been charged with, much less convicted of.

The last I heard, Hunter Biden had never been elected to any public office (and will never be elected), so what kind of scum he is matters little beyond his immediate family and friends.

As for Trump's crimes, Alvin Bragg campaigned for DA on a platform to get tough on white-collar crime. Since he took office, he filed 166 felony counts against 34 individuals and companies under the same statute that Trump was charged with. Many of them have already resulted in convictions or guilty pleas.

[flockofseagulls104]

As for Trump's crimes, Alvin Bragg campaigned for DA on a platform to get tough on white-collar crime. Since he took office, he filed 166 felony counts against 34 individuals and companies under the same statute that Trump was charged with. Many of them have already resulted in convictions or guilty pleas.

Oh, REALLY? How many did he file past the statute of limitations involving 'federal' charges that the feds declined to bring? Do we even know what the 'underlying' crime was that turned this fabricated misdemeanor into a felony? You tell me, or does it even matter?

[silverscreenselect]

As for Trump's crimes, Alvin Bragg campaigned for DA on a platform to get tough on white-collar crime. Since he took office, he filed 166 felony counts against 34 individuals and companies under the same statute that Trump was charged with. Many of them have already resulted in convictions or guilty pleas.

Oh, REALLY? How many did he file past the statute of limitations involving 'federal' charges that the feds declined to bring? Do we even know what the 'underlying' crime was that turned this fabricated misdemeanor into a felony? You tell me, or does it even matter?

Again, your knowledge of facts and law are abysmal. Then-Governor Cuomo issued two executive orders as a result of COVID that tolled the statute of limitations in New York for one year and 47 days during the COVID emergency. As a result, claims that arose prior to COVID had an year and 47 days added to the limitations period. The statute on Trump's crimes began when the various false records were made in 2017 and are covered by this tolling period. And Judge Merchan, in a pre-trial order mentioned three specific criminal laws that Trump's falsifications were in furtherance of: the Federal Election Campaigns Act, New York Election Law 17-152, and IRS Code 'rax Law $\ 18f,01(a)(3), 1802. The State actually alleged possible violations of a fourth criminal statute, but Merchan dismissed those allegations before trial.

As for why the Trump justice department didn't seriously investigate crimes allegedly committed by Trump, do you really need to ask that question?

[flockofseagulls104]

There were no crimes committed by Trump. Only politically driven lawsuits made up out of thin air, just like the 2 impeachments.

As for Biden. I am willing to give him the benefit of the doubt on the farting meme, and maybe the walking out of the ceremony early meme. Spare me the explanations and obligatory links, trollboy. Your side has been doing this to Trump and conservatives for years. Payback is a bitch. But this one is completely disrespectful. He embarrassed our country in front of the world today.

[silverscreenselect]

There were no crimes committed by Trump. Only politically driven lawsuits made up out of thin air, just like the 2 impeachments.

As for Biden. I am willing to give him the benefit of the doubt on the farting meme, and maybe the walking out of the ceremony early meme. Spare me the explanations and obligatory links, trollboy. Your side has been doing this to Trump and conservatives for years. Payback is a bitch. But this one is completely disrespectful. He embarrassed our country in front of the world today.

What you omitted in your feigned outrage about Biden was the fact that some of the Normandy veterans were seated directly behind him. He turned to pay tribute to them and their fallen comrades, as he did several times during his speech as well. It only outraged those same people at Fox who somehow found nothing wrong with Trump's refusing to visit a military cemetery in France because he didn't want his hair to get messed up in the rain and who referred to the American troops buried there as suckers and losers. Whatever the protocols are for Taps, they don't cover a situation in which the commander-in-chief is paying tribute to a small group of 100-year-old men remembering their comrades who died on D-Day. And by the way the speech was very well received by everyone outside the Fox/Flock news bubble.

And there is no official protocol for Taps. Standing and facing the flag is a custom; Biden felt that facing the actual troops involved was more fitting under the circumstances.

[flockofseagulls104]

There were no crimes committed by Trump. Only politically driven lawsuits made up out of thin air, just like the 2 impeachments.

As for Biden. I am willing to give him the benefit of the doubt on the farting meme, and maybe the walking out of the ceremony early meme. Spare me the explanations and obligatory links, trollboy. Your side has been doing this to Trump and conservatives for years. Payback is a bitch. But this one is completely disrespectful. He embarrassed our country in front of the world today.

What you omitted in your feigned outrage about Biden was the fact that some of the Normandy veterans were seated directly behind him. He turned to pay tribute to them and their fallen comrades, as he did several times during his speech as well. It only outraged those same people at Fox who somehow found nothing wrong with Trump's refusing to visit a military cemetery in France because he didn't want his hair to get messed up in the rain and who referred to the American troops buried there as suckers and losers. Whatever the protocols are for Taps, they don't cover a situation in which the commander-in-chief is paying tribute to a small group of 100-year-old men remembering their comrades who died on D-Day. And by the way the speech was very well received by everyone outside the Fox/Flock news bubble.

And there is no official protocol for Taps. Standing and facing the flag is a custom; Biden felt that facing the actual troops involved was more fitting under the circumstances.

My outrage is not feigned like yours is towards grassroots conservatives and Trump.


I believe there is protocol for Taps, unless of course, you are senile and incompetent of standing trial for retaining classified material you are not even authorized to have. It does not include, as far as I know, turning your back and staring at nothing and nobody.

Your blindness towards recognizing biden's obvious senility is deafening.

[silverscreenselect]

I believe there is protocol for Taps, unless of course, you are senile and incompetent of standing trial for retaining classified material you are not even authorized to have. It does not include, as far as I know, turning your back and staring at nothing and nobody.

Your blindness towards recognizing biden's obvious senility is deafening.

Every military source I saw said "There is no official protocol for taps'." And if you'll look at this coverage of the entire event (go to the 1:57 mark), you'll see that Biden wasn't "staring at nothing and nobody." He was looking at the former soldiers behind him and when Taps ended, he gave them a crisp salute. Not exactly what some obviously senile man would do. Earlier, during his speech at 1:36:30, he turns around and says: "On behalf of the American people, and as Commander in Chief, it's the highest honor to be able to salute you, here in Normandy once more, all of you, God love you." It's protocol for lower-ranking personnel to salute a higher-ranking officer first, and as commander in chief, Biden was the highest ranking officer there. But he saluted the 100-year-old veterans behind him then and when he turned around to look at them during Taps.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0rY2aJPFB0

As is typical for right wingers, you can't comment on Biden's moving 15-minute speech, so you pull a couple of clips totally out of context to "prove" your point. I'm looking forward to Biden wiping the floor with Trump at the upcoming debate.