I think what's galling is that you support Russia rolling over the Ukraine, because you think fewer people will die that way. Hardly clear, especially if it leads to a broader European war. You do not care about individual Ukrainians one whit, or you would want Russian invading and sacking their country. I am sure some young woman raped by a Russian soldier will console herself thinking, "well, at least they haven't killed me yet, and flock can sleep better at night."flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 20, 2024 6:22 pmSo, our response to Navalny is we are going to impose 'very strong sanctions'!
Excuse me, didn't we do that already? I think biden believes everyone's memory is as bad as his. I thought our previous sanctions would bring Russia to its knees and stop them from waging war and bring it to an end quickly? Somehow, I deduce that didn't quite work.
I want the war to end, I want no more people on either side to die, and I want a peaceful solution that keeps Ukraine a sovereign nation. But I do not agree with giving them endless money. That hasn't stopped the war thus far, and I don't see how it will lead to any end, except more people being killed. Your solution is to have it go on until Russia gets tired of it? Using OUR money, which we have to borrow from other countries that hate us? What about the innocent people who will be casualties until that ever happens? You are so willing to question my, and Spock's and whoever's humanity. Where the fuck is yours, doc?
And Ukraine does need the resources, including money. Failure to do so will guarantee that above. That will give a victory to Russia, and its friends China and Iran. This isn't a domino theory theoretical - that war is happening RIGHT now.
It is interesting how uncreative you are. WHATEVER Trump supports, you invariably support, too.