Question for Appa

[silverscreenselect]

So you agree that Derek Chauvin should be cleared and released? That's progress.

Why do you disagree with the jury that listened to all of the evidence and found that his actions constituted criminal homicide? Will you ever accept court findings that go against your political preferences? Or do you think that homicidal cops should get a free pass? --Bob

You know what was in the minds of the jurors? Wow, your a better lawyer than I though.

You don't have to be a mindreader or a great lawyer. You just have to read. Or more precisely, read something that doesn't come from the right-wing propoganda machine.

“This is not what he did but more or less what he didn’t do,” Doud added, referring to Chauvin. “He did not provide life-saving measures for George Floyd when he knew that the guy was in pain or needed medical attention.” Deters was a holdout – either for not guilty or undecided – until Doud spoke of intent. “I was just kind of, like, ‘Oh my gosh, you’re totally right,’” Deters said. “There is intent … to not provide lifesaving measures when he knew three times there was no pulse.”

Derek Chauvin jurors speak out for the first time, recalling ‘traumatic experience’ and that light-bulb moment

Or if you prefer the long version:

[Weyoun]

I forgot that BiT is one of the holdouts who still thinks that George Floyd somehow wasn’t murdered.

Probably thought Emmett Till had it coming, also

[Bob78164]

So you agree that Derek Chauvin should be cleared and released? That's progress.

Why do you disagree with the jury that listened to all of the evidence and found that his actions constituted criminal homicide? Will you ever accept court findings that go against your political preferences? Or do you think that homicidal cops should get a free pass? --Bob

You know what was in the minds of the jurors? Wow, your a better lawyer than I though.

Their unanimous verdict that he committed criminal homicide is an awfully good indication that they thought he committed criminal homicide. Doesn't really take a lawyer to make that connection. Just a smidgen of common sense, so I guess I shouldn't be surprised that you couldn't see it. --Bob

[flockofseagulls104]

Why do you disagree with the jury that listened to all of the evidence and found that his actions constituted criminal homicide? Will you ever accept court findings that go against your political preferences? Or do you think that homicidal cops should get a free pass? --Bob

You know what was in the minds of the jurors? Wow, your a better lawyer than I though.

Their unanimous verdict that he committed criminal homicide is an awfully good indication that they thought he committed criminal homicide. Doesn't really take a lawyer to make that connection. Just a smidgen of common sense, so I guess I shouldn't be surprised that you couldn't see it. --Bob

So, bobby, who incited the violent 'insurrections' that occurred simultaneously all over the country in reaction to this incident? Why aren't they being prosecuted for it?

[flockofseagulls104]

Why do you disagree with the jury that listened to all of the evidence and found that his actions constituted criminal homicide? Will you ever accept court findings that go against your political preferences? Or do you think that homicidal cops should get a free pass? --Bob

You know what was in the minds of the jurors? Wow, your a better lawyer than I though.

Their unanimous verdict that he committed criminal homicide is an awfully good indication that they thought he committed criminal homicide. Doesn't really take a lawyer to make that connection. Just a smidgen of common sense, so I guess I shouldn't be surprised that you couldn't see it. --Bob

I don't question the verdict. I question the reaction to the incident.

On that subject, bobby, Trump was impeached on the issue of Jan 6, and he was acquitted. That is an awful good indication that the people who actually have authority on this matter did NOT think he is guilty. But you only apply this standard when it benefits you, right? Otherwise, just ignore it.

[Bob78164]

Would someone care to point the ignorant moron interjecting himself into this thread to the numerous statements by Republican senators who voted to acquit on the grounds that (a) Donny couldn't be convicted after his term ended or (b) the appropriate response for Donny's actions was use of the criminal justice system? --Bob

[flockofseagulls104]

Would someone care to point the ignorant moron interjecting himself into this thread to the numerous statements by Republican senators who voted to acquit on the grounds that (a) Donny couldn't be convicted after his term ended or (b) the appropriate response for Donny's actions was use of the criminal justice system? --Bob

Would someone remind the sanctimonious assclown how he scolds anyone who questions the verdict of a court of his own question: "Will you ever accept court findings that go against your political preferences?"

Apparently, the sanctimonious assclown believes in double jeopardy. If they don't get the verdict they want the first time, they try and get it in any other way they can dream up, using their immense private and political resources.

Sorry for injecting myself into your thread. No one seems bothered when my personal troll and other jerks butt their innane comments into any conversation I try to have with someone who seems to be able to conduct a reasonable conversation.

[tlynn78]

Would someone care to point the ignorant moron interjecting himself into this thread to the numerous statements by Republican senators who voted to acquit on the grounds that (a) Donny couldn't be convicted after his term ended or (b) the appropriate response for Donny's actions was use of the criminal justice system? --Bob

Would someone remind the sanctimonious assclown how he scolds anyone who questions the verdict of a court of his own question: "Will you ever accept court findings that go against your political preferences?"

Apparently, the sanctimonious assclown believes in double jeopardy. If they don't get the verdict they want the first time, they try and get it in any other way they can dream up, using their immense private and political resources.

Sorry for injecting myself into your thread. No one seems bothered when my personal troll and other jerks butt their innane comments into any conversation I try to have with someone who seems to be able to conduct a reasonable conversation.

To be fair, Flock, the sanctimonious assclown can't seem to help himself.

[tlynn78]

Would someone care to point the ignorant moron interjecting himself into this thread to the numerous statements by Republican senators who voted to acquit on the grounds that (a) Donny couldn't be convicted after his term ended or (b) the appropriate response for Donny's actions was use of the criminal justice system? --Bob

Bobbo - just look in the mirror and do it yourself.