Page 1 of 1
FNGD Q5 - FALSE NOTES.
Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 9:26 pm
by etaoin22
B - I don't care, pharmacologic or non-pharmacologic.
His 9.79 was one of the most amazing athletic feats I have seen (at least on TV).
G - I don't know if I should be young, restless, turning or guided....
Her sequence of 10's was completely justified at the time, everyone thought, but it seems it reflected in part the pre-agreement of how this set of events in 1976 would be scored.
Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 9:29 pm
by christie1111
I don't know either of these answers.
Re: FNGD Q5 - FALSE NOTES.
Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 9:30 pm
by SportsFan68
etaoin22 wrote:B - I don't care, pharmacologic or non-pharmacologic.
His 9.79 was one of the most amazing athletic feats I have seen (at least on TV).
Thomas.
G - I don't know if I should be young, restless, turning or guided....
Her sequence of 10's was completely justified at the time, everyone thought, but it seems it reflected in part the pre-agreement of how this set of events in 1976 would be scored.
Barter.
Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 9:31 pm
by silvercamaro
B - Ben Johnson? (I'm guessing the 9.79 is for 100 m., rather than for gymnastics or something else.)
G- Nadia Comaneci
Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 9:34 pm
by etaoin22
yeh, ben and nadia.
I dunno if a horse dose of anabolic agents boinks the muscles in the immediate term. BUt Ben was amazing.
Nadia, too.
Most amazing athletism I have seen live: Gary Carter doing batting and fielding practice a day or two after being called up from the minors in September, 1974.
The Kid was a bit of a show-off.......
and for sticking around, a JFF Q6 although all has been pure JFF today
Re: FNGD Q5 - FALSE NOTES.
Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2008 10:12 am
by ulysses5019
etaoin22 wrote:B - I don't care, pharmacologic or non-pharmacologic.
His 9.79 was one of the most amazing athletic feats I have seen (at least on TV).
G - I don't know if I should be young, restless, turning or guided....
Her sequence of 10's was completely justified at the time, everyone thought, but it seems it reflected in part the pre-agreement of how this set of events in 1976 would be scored.
ben johnson
nadia comenci
Re: FNGD Q5 - FALSE NOTES.
Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:10 am
by peacock2121
etaoin22 wrote:B - I don't care, pharmacologic or non-pharmacologic.
His 9.79 was one of the most amazing athletic feats I have seen (at least on TV).
G - I don't know if I should be young, restless, turning or guided....
Her sequence of 10's was completely justified at the time, everyone thought, but it seems it reflected in part the pre-agreement of how this set of events in 1976 would be scored.
Ben Johnson, I hope
Nadia please don't make me type her last name Comonich