Page 1 of 1

A question...Annie can answer maybe?

Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2008 6:13 pm
by T_Bone0806
This just dawned on me...

We have the bored designations of two footers (those who walk on two feet) and four footers (those who walk on four feet).

I don't walk at all. I mean, I USED to be a two footer, but not anymore. Does that make me a no footer? Or a four wheeler? Or, since I sit on my rear end to get around, would I be a one butter? Or a two cheeker?

Where do I fit in? Do I belong at all? Am I a misfit like Rudolph and Hermie and that cowboy that rides an ostrich? Should I use an ostrich instead of a wheelchair? Do I have too much time to sit and think about stupid stuff like this? Do you know the way to San Jose?

Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2008 6:31 pm
by a1mamacat
you can be Professor T-Xavier... :lol:

Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2008 6:34 pm
by T_Bone0806
a1mamacat wrote:you can be Professor T-Xavier... :lol:
Not bad, but I don't think I'd look so good bald.

Although at some point I may not have any choice :roll:

Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2008 6:39 pm
by AnnieCamaro
Mr. T, you are a two-footer. If you didn't have any legs at all, you would still be a two-footer. In your particular case, you're a two-footer on wheels. Being a two-footer or a four-footer is about attitude, not shoes or transportation.

But, do you have an ostrich you could ride? That would be so cool!

The way to San Jose from my house is to drive north on I-35, then turn west on I-40, then when you get somewhere near Los Angeles, then take a right and drive north on I-5 until you get there. I've never taken that route myself, but I'm going to ask my mom to drive me there, to make sure I'm giving you accurate directions.

Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2008 7:24 pm
by T_Bone0806
AnnieCamaro wrote:Mr. T, you are a two-footer. If you didn't have any legs at all, you would still be a two-footer. In your particular case, you're a two-footer on wheels. Being a two-footer or a four-footer is about attitude, not shoes or transportation.

But, do you have an ostrich you could ride? That would be so cool!

The way to San Jose from my house is to drive north on I-35, then turn west on I-40, then when you get somewhere near Los Angeles, then take a right and drive north on I-5 until you get there. I've never taken that route myself, but I'm going to ask my mom to drive me there, to make sure I'm giving you accurate directions.
Thank you Miss Annie. You are wise beyond your years.

I don't think they sell ostriches at the pet store in the mall, but maybe they can special order one.

Re: A question...Annie can answer maybe?

Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2008 9:03 pm
by ulysses5019
T_Bone0806 wrote:This just dawned on me...

We have the bored designations of two footers (those who walk on two feet) and four footers (those who walk on four feet).

I don't walk at all. I mean, I USED to be a two footer, but not anymore. Does that make me a no footer? Or a four wheeler? Or, since I sit on my rear end to get around, would I be a one butter? Or a two cheeker?

Where do I fit in? Do I belong at all? Am I a misfit like Rudolph and Hermie and that cowboy that rides an ostrich? Should I use an ostrich instead of a wheelchair? Do I have too much time to sit and think about stupid stuff like this? Do you know the way to San Jose?

i think you should try murderball

Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2008 9:06 pm
by AnnieCamaro
Mr. T, I was wondering if you had any of those duct tape underoos, like Mr. Uly is wearing in his photograph?

I think it's nice when Mr. Uly uses his own photo for an avatar.

/:P\

Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2008 9:08 pm
by Beebs52
You're an alternative footer. You may be whatever you want to be. Maybe a progressive footer.

Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2008 9:48 pm
by cindy.wellman
I agree with the 2-footer answer. As usual, that was a great answer, Annie. I giggled at the two-cheeker option though. :lol:

Fanny was involved in an interesting discussion about the island of misfit toys. If she sees this thread, I wonder if she'll remember it. I don't think her questions were ever resolved.

Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2008 9:52 pm
by AnnieCamaro
Sigh. Mr. Uly changed his underwear.

Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2008 9:57 pm
by ulysses5019
AnnieCamaro wrote:Mr. T, I was wondering if you had any of those duct tape underoos, like Mr. Uly is wearing in his photograph?

I think it's nice when Mr. Uly uses his own photo for an avatar.

/:P\
what photograph

Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2008 10:04 pm
by AnnieCamaro
ulysses5019 wrote:
AnnieCamaro wrote:Mr. T, I was wondering if you had any of those duct tape underoos, like Mr. Uly is wearing in his photograph?

I think it's nice when Mr. Uly uses his own photo for an avatar.

/:P\
what photograph
The one that's #4 in the gallery here:

http://www.asylum.com/2008/09/04/25-ama ... duct-tape/

I couldn't figure out how to copy it, or it would be pasted right here for all the world to admire as much as I do.

/:P\

Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2008 11:38 pm
by ulysses5019
AnnieCamaro wrote:
ulysses5019 wrote:
AnnieCamaro wrote:Mr. T, I was wondering if you had any of those duct tape underoos, like Mr. Uly is wearing in his photograph?

I think it's nice when Mr. Uly uses his own photo for an avatar.

/:P\
what photograph
The one that's #4 in the gallery here:

http://www.asylum.com/2008/09/04/25-ama ... duct-tape/

I couldn't figure out how to copy it, or it would be pasted right here for all the world to admire as much as I do.

/:P\
i do not recall ever seeing let alone using said photograph

Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2008 12:05 am
by AnnieCamaro
ulysses5019 wrote:
AnnieCamaro wrote:
ulysses5019 wrote: what photograph
The one that's #4 in the gallery here:

http://www.asylum.com/2008/09/04/25-ama ... duct-tape/

I couldn't figure out how to copy it, or it would be pasted right here for all the world to admire as much as I do.

/:P\
i do not recall ever seeing let alone using said photograph
Oh. I get it.

I must have been mistaken, and all the people who saw that photograph here earlier tonight must have been mistaken, too. Unless they say they were not.

If I weren't mistaken, I would have noted that I thought it was a nice picture of you, even though we (the ones who are mistaken) like the photos of you where you are smiling the best. You have a very nice smile, which was not displayed to its best advantage, so to speak, in the photo that we mistakenly thought we saw, but perhaps didn't.

Two-footers are so complicated! I don't see how any of you manage to get along with each other. Dogs have it much easier. We have to remember only two basic interactions: Tail-waggy nice dog -- sniff. Fang-snarly mean dog -- run. It works for us.

/:P\

Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2008 12:08 am
by Evil Squirrel
AnnieCamaro wrote:Two-footers are so complicated! I don't see how any of you manage to get along with each other. Dogs have it much easier. We have to remember only two basic interactions: Tail-waggy nice dog -- sniff. Fang-snarly mean dog -- run. It works for us.

/:P\

I have just one basic interaction..... chuck and snicker.

~~/--\ :twisted:

Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2008 12:12 am
by AnnieCamaro
Evil Squirrel wrote:
I have just one basic interaction..... chuck and snicker.
That is why the basic dog-squirrel interaction is bark and duck.

Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2008 8:17 am
by cindy.wellman
I think it is very cute and clever that Annie found the hidden doggie smileys (emoticons?) on this board.