Was WWTBAM the first non-competitive game show?

The forum for general posting. Come join the madness. :)
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
frogman042
Bored Pun-dit
Posts: 3200
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 6:36 am

Was WWTBAM the first non-competitive game show?

#1 Post by frogman042 » Thu Jul 31, 2008 4:06 pm

This past weekend I was trying to come up with an earlier game show where the contestents didn't compete against anyone other then themselves, and couldn't think of one. Even Groucho Marx's You Bet Your Life had the high scorer come back for a final round, IIRC. Maybe there was one in the very early days of TV - but I can't think of any.

So, was Millionaire the fist game show where you didn't have to worry about how anyone else did? Other shows of course followed the format after Millionaire took off, but did any show use a similar format before?

It was nice to be in a green room where you could root for everyone to win a million, without worrying that it would somehow work against you.

---Jay

User avatar
ulysses5019
Purveyor of Avatars
Posts: 19442
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:52 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: Was WWTBAM the first non-competitive game show?

#2 Post by ulysses5019 » Thu Jul 31, 2008 4:09 pm

frogman042 wrote:This past weekend I was trying to come up with an earlier game show where the contestents didn't compete against anyone other then themselves, and couldn't think of one. Even Groucho Marx's You Bet Your Life had the high scorer come back for a final round, IIRC. Maybe there was one in the very early days of TV - but I can't think of any.

So, was Millionaire the fist game show where you didn't have to worry about how anyone else did? Other shows of course followed the format after Millionaire took off, but did any show use a similar format before?

It was nice to be in a green room where you could root for everyone to win a million, without worrying that it would somehow work against you.

---Jay
Of course there was the fastest finger.
I believe in the usefulness of useless information.

User avatar
TheConfessor
Posts: 6462
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 1:11 pm

#3 Post by TheConfessor » Thu Jul 31, 2008 4:13 pm

The original WWTBAM was a competitive show. I think it still is in some countries. I was beaten by other contestants on four different FF questions in 2000 and 2001 before I got to play the non-competitive bonus game in the hot seat.

The auditions remain as a key competitive part of the show that is not included in the broadcast. And of course, the phone game was very competitive.

User avatar
frogman042
Bored Pun-dit
Posts: 3200
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 6:36 am

#4 Post by frogman042 » Thu Jul 31, 2008 4:21 pm

TheConfessor wrote:The original WWTBAM was a competitive show. I think it still is in some countries. I was beaten by other contestants on four different FF questions in 2000 and 2001 before I got to play the non-competitive bonus game in the hot seat.

The auditions remain as a key competitive part of the show that is not included in the broadcast. And of course, the phone game was very competitive.
OK, OK --- yes but the Syndie version is not competitive as an actual game. So excluding actually getting on the show - and not including the Nighttime version - was the Syndicated version the first non-competitive game-play game show (or can you find yet another loophole in my question)?

---Jay

User avatar
mcd1400de
Posts: 541
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 11:01 am
Location: the Physics department

#5 Post by mcd1400de » Thu Jul 31, 2008 4:27 pm

I've Got A Secret didn't feature any direct competition between contestants.

For anyone who might be unfamiliar with IGAS: each contestant individually attempted to stump the panel of celebrities, who asked the player a series of yes/no questions in trying to guess their "secret". The contestant's winnings would increase with each successive "no" answer they elicited from the panel.
Bazinga!

User avatar
frogman042
Bored Pun-dit
Posts: 3200
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 6:36 am

#6 Post by frogman042 » Thu Jul 31, 2008 4:30 pm

mcd1400de wrote:I've Got A Secret didn't feature any direct competition between contestants.

For anyone who might be unfamiliar with IGAS: each contestant individually attempted to stump the panel of celebrities, who asked the player a series of yes/no questions in trying to guess their "secret". The contestant's winnings would increase with each successive "no" answer they elicited from the panel.
Now that you mention it, yes - and that brings to mind both What's My Line as well as What's My Perversion.

I don't think they took the top winners from any of the shows for the day for a bigger prize.

Thanks,

---Jay

User avatar
frogman042
Bored Pun-dit
Posts: 3200
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 6:36 am

#7 Post by frogman042 » Thu Jul 31, 2008 4:39 pm

mcd1400de wrote:I've Got A Secret didn't feature any direct competition between contestants.

For anyone who might be unfamiliar with IGAS: each contestant individually attempted to stump the panel of celebrities, who asked the player a series of yes/no questions in trying to guess their "secret". The contestant's winnings would increase with each successive "no" answer they elicited from the panel.
Although, now that I think about it, the contestents actually didn't 'play' the game, the panelists did, they were the object of the game - they just had to answer Yes or No - their only real control was having either a really interesting secret or occupation.

So, I'm going to amend the question again:
Was the syndicated version of Millionaire the first game show where the contestents, once they actually got on to play, and were the key players of the game, requiring them to actually drive the game play and use their knowledge/talent/skill to solve the games/questions/challenges - the first game show that they didn't actively compete against other contestants on the aforementioned show?

---Jay (you'll never make a lawyer out of me)

User avatar
TheConfessor
Posts: 6462
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 1:11 pm

#8 Post by TheConfessor » Thu Jul 31, 2008 4:48 pm

Someone may correct me on this, but I don't recall The Chair having contestants competing against each other. It premiered several months before Syndicated Millionaire.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0306295/plotsummary

User avatar
goongas
Posts: 757
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:50 pm
Location: Flying over the Valley of Eternal Peril

#9 Post by goongas » Thu Jul 31, 2008 4:56 pm

The $64,000 question, which BAM is a modern remake of, I don't think had two contestants against each other.

User avatar
bazodee
Posts: 944
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 10:23 am
Location: Atlanta, Georgia

#10 Post by bazodee » Thu Jul 31, 2008 5:05 pm

Jack Narz hosted a show in the early 1960s called "Seven Keys". It was just one contestant playing against "the Board". If they won, they chose one of seven keys, each of which opened doors to fabulous prizes. If they won the board game, they could either try their keys, or return for another game to try to win a second key, etc.

I'm tempted to say there are many examples where it's been just one vs. TPTB. I'll keep thinking about this ...

User avatar
MarleysGh0st
Posts: 27966
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:55 am
Location: Elsewhere

#11 Post by MarleysGh0st » Thu Jul 31, 2008 7:17 pm

goongas wrote:The $64,000 question, which BAM is a modern remake of, I don't think had two contestants against each other.
You're right! And this TV show, which debuted in 1954, was inspired by a radio show going back to 1940.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_$64,000_Question

User avatar
TheConfessor
Posts: 6462
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 1:11 pm

#12 Post by TheConfessor » Thu Jul 31, 2008 7:22 pm

MarleysGh0st wrote:
goongas wrote:The $64,000 question, which BAM is a modern remake of, I don't think had two contestants against each other.
You're right! And this TV show, which debuted in 1954, was inspired by a radio show going back to 1940.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_$64,000_Question
They apparently also established the clock precedent, to assure a fast pace. One question per week. I guess people had longer attention spans back then.

Post Reply