Any quick advice on how to take a screen shot & get it into a word document?
The program generating the junk XXXXXXX fascinating material that needs the screen-shot taken is in a program we get to via internet explorer. I have to get the picture of the screen in some form I can import into a Word doc, & then, of course, I actually have to import it into the Word doc.
In previous administrations (at work, not in DC) I've just printed a copy of the screen & faxed it, but that isn't "good enough" anymore.
I will sign back on Monday for guffaws & any actual advice; thanks in advance for that last.
Computerly advice: screen shots
- tubadave
- Official Bored Breaker/Fixer
- Posts: 827
- Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 8:17 pm
- Location: D/FW, TX
The Prt Scr (Print Screen) key will take a snapshot of your screen. You can then open Word and paste (CTRL-V) the screenshot into a blank document.
If you want to take a picture of just the current active window (rather than the whole screen) then just hold down ALT when you hit the Prt Scr key.
If you want to take a picture of just the current active window (rather than the whole screen) then just hold down ALT when you hit the Prt Scr key.
"Not all chemicals are bad. Without chemicals such as hydrogen and oxygen, for example, there would be no way to make water, a vital ingredient in beer." -- Dave Barry
- Snaxx
- Posts: 4669
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:24 pm
- Location: I've been everywhere. Really? Not quite really.
- Contact:
Thanks, I forgot about that option. When I needed only part of a screen, I took an extra step and pasted into Paint or Photoshop and then cropped it. Then I "selected all" and copied-pasted the result into Word.tubadave wrote: If you want to take a picture of just the current active window (rather than the whole screen) then just hold down ALT when you hit the Prt Scr key.
.
- ghostjmf
- Posts: 7437
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 11:09 am
Thanks
OK, I lied, I went to the square, bought tapes (probably the last tape buyer on earth I guess, but they're still making them for me!) had a fattening but delicious ice cream soda, known in New England as a float (ask for ice cream soda & they'll blenderize your darn soda in milk or something; what I would call a milkshake!) came back to get the start time for this week's Regenesis which I am taping (video tape, not what what I bought) for my sister (I've already seen years 1 & 2, which they're inexplicably rerunning most of again, even though they're past the suddenly in-vogue Ellen Page episodes) & of course any advice here.
I was gonna whine that that I don't have a print screen key (I assumed I had to be inside of or have activated or whatever some exotic program I don't have) but I see that I do. Oh. Either my last keyboard didn't have one or, worse, it did, but all you got was blanks. Which I think I do remember.
I will try to resist testing this because I have to pack if I'm going to listen to music in miserably hot weather this weekend. I'm becoming more & more an indoor concert only person as I age. One last miserable July weekend?
I was gonna whine that that I don't have a print screen key (I assumed I had to be inside of or have activated or whatever some exotic program I don't have) but I see that I do. Oh. Either my last keyboard didn't have one or, worse, it did, but all you got was blanks. Which I think I do remember.
I will try to resist testing this because I have to pack if I'm going to listen to music in miserably hot weather this weekend. I'm becoming more & more an indoor concert only person as I age. One last miserable July weekend?
Last edited by ghostjmf on Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- ghostjmf
- Posts: 7437
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 11:09 am
I lied again. I tried it. I saw nothing. Remember, being a literal person, I expected to (a) see something, & (b) hear my printer printing away. Then I thought "well, remember how much magic the network people have to do to connect various stuff directly to my printer". But I still thought "I should see something".
But just for the heck of it, I opened a Word document. Of course answering the every-time dire warnings of "this program won't work; it has disabled macros" with "begone" ("OK", actually). And I ctr-V'd merrily into my macro-disabled about-to-blow-up-or-whatever Word doc. And there was my screenshot.
Amazing.
Thanks, all.
But just for the heck of it, I opened a Word document. Of course answering the every-time dire warnings of "this program won't work; it has disabled macros" with "begone" ("OK", actually). And I ctr-V'd merrily into my macro-disabled about-to-blow-up-or-whatever Word doc. And there was my screenshot.
Amazing.
Thanks, all.
- ghostjmf
- Posts: 7437
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 11:09 am
For the days Back When They Respected/Accepted Faxes:
We have a very good search function in the program that is being ditched (largely for political reasons) here. We have a very lousy search function in the new program. I kept telling people who could "make it happen" what we needed on a search function page. Very clearly, technical-writer style, via e-mail. Lotsa spaces between the one-line thoughts, all designed for the "must be bullet-point!" crowd. I knew I should be sending them a darn screenshot but didn't think I was set up to do it. And print-screen, from within the program, gave me blank pages. I then literally stumbled upon using page-preview from within the program. I didn't change a darn thing, but having used the page-preview feature (in IE) before the print-screen feature inexplicably gave me a demo of what I wanted.
So now, many moons later, we are reportedly getting at least some of what I wanted. It will not be in the form I want it, I get hints. It will work a lot slower ("cuppa coffee" duration they say) than the instantaneous search in the to-be-politically-discarded program. But it will at least exist.
"A picture is worth a whole bunch of words".
(I had previously done "pretty much a screen-trace" on paper with pen, as well. Its gotta be a "professionally-drawn-looking picture", not just a picture.)
We have a very good search function in the program that is being ditched (largely for political reasons) here. We have a very lousy search function in the new program. I kept telling people who could "make it happen" what we needed on a search function page. Very clearly, technical-writer style, via e-mail. Lotsa spaces between the one-line thoughts, all designed for the "must be bullet-point!" crowd. I knew I should be sending them a darn screenshot but didn't think I was set up to do it. And print-screen, from within the program, gave me blank pages. I then literally stumbled upon using page-preview from within the program. I didn't change a darn thing, but having used the page-preview feature (in IE) before the print-screen feature inexplicably gave me a demo of what I wanted.
So now, many moons later, we are reportedly getting at least some of what I wanted. It will not be in the form I want it, I get hints. It will work a lot slower ("cuppa coffee" duration they say) than the instantaneous search in the to-be-politically-discarded program. But it will at least exist.
"A picture is worth a whole bunch of words".
(I had previously done "pretty much a screen-trace" on paper with pen, as well. Its gotta be a "professionally-drawn-looking picture", not just a picture.)
- silvercamaro
- Dog's Best Friend
- Posts: 9608
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:45 am