WWTBAM Bored

No post in 1 week - bold
No post in 2+ weeks - italics


1. Sprots
2. Pea
3. Marley
4. Skoop
5. earendel
6. bbking
7. Cal
8. lb13
9. silvercamaro
10. Bixby
11. aj
12. BDM
13. Barbarella
14. ghostjmf
15. Saucy
16. BiT
17. etaoin
18. Amaz
19. KT
20. JBG
21. starfish
22. Sir G
23. Eyegor
24. mini (up 1)
25. Corn (down 1)
26. TBone
27. aussie
28. Dr J
29. HoltDad
30. PSM
31. Linus
32. tribe
33. mrkelley
34. ging
35. flock
36. BobJuch
37. Harv
38. tmitsss
39. HFJai
40. Buffacuse
41. takinover
42. christie
43. wbtravis
44. tgirl
45. Ace
46. Kay
47. indigo
48. nitrah
49. Bob46187
50. MACRAE
51. Rexer
52. MMFF (up 1)
53. tubadave (down 1)
54. jeemie
55. Kazoo
56. RJS
57. kidtejas
58. TR
59. TiV
60. rubbersnail
61. gsn
62. goongas
63. Snaxx
64. Tocque
65. renovator
66. SSS
67. rob wilson
68. AD
69. NE1410S
70. wild bill
71. Booch
72. ulysses (up 2)
73. toeth (down 1)
74. Timsterino (down 1)
75. macsdaddy
76. gsabc
77. kusch
78. dodgersteve
79. BeeMan
80. vails
81. vandal
82. RevDodd
83. oldernow
84. Spock
85. gretagarbo
86. ScrabbleTed
87. Nelly
88. Fanny (up 2)
89. Weasel (down 1)
90. Tanstaafl (down 1)
91. wintergreen (up 1)
92. DaveSenior (down 1)
93. melly
94. John9826
95. Chase1207
96. moon
97. deb in ga
98. golfmanbob
99. peter5858
100. plasticene

WooHoo! Still movin' on up. Am I close to any of those above me?
And congrats to the other greenies.

ulysses5019 wrote:WooHoo! Still movin' on up. Am I close to any of those above me?

Only 42,000 or so to go to catch Sprots....

lb13

littlebeast13 wrote:

ulysses5019 wrote:WooHoo! Still movin' on up. Am I close to any of those above me?

Only 42,000 or so to go to catch Sprots....

lb13

Ok. I'll get to work. Maybe she'll go on an extended fishing vacation.

All it will take is 42,000 posts and 41,857 avatar changes and Uly will be #1.

Yeah, I"m kinda surprised he didn't change for this version of the rankings.

Surely there's a picture of a heat pack out there somewhere....

mrkelley23 wrote:Yeah, I"m kinda surprised he didn't change for this version of the rankings.

Surely there's a picture of a heat pack out there somewhere....

Does this work?

Nope - it didn't.

And Nelly and I are together again in the Valley of Death. Might as well crack open a couple of cold ones and kick back. We'll be here a spell.

I did not move up, despite the somnolent BB's ahead of me.

I'm not gratuitive by nature.

I must try to become so.

Maybe the personality change will help with my next audition.

mrkelley23 wrote:Yeah, I"m kinda surprised he didn't change for this version of the rankings.

Surely there's a picture of a heat pack out there somewhere....

Our ears are burnin'.

ulysses5019 wrote:

mrkelley23 wrote:Yeah, I"m kinda surprised he didn't change for this version of the rankings.

Surely there's a picture of a heat pack out there somewhere....

Our ears are burnin'.

Too late for you guys to defend yourselves. I'd say you're both stuffed....

Evil Squirrel wrote:

ulysses5019 wrote:

mrkelley23 wrote:Yeah, I"m kinda surprised he didn't change for this version of the rankings.

Surely there's a picture of a heat pack out there somewhere....

Our ears are burnin'.

Too late for you guys to defend yourselves. I'd say you're both stuffed....

Who you callin' stuffed?

ulysses5019 wrote:

littlebeast13 wrote:

ulysses5019 wrote:WooHoo! Still movin' on up. Am I close to any of those above me?

Only 42,000 or so to go to catch Sprots....

lb13

Ok. I'll get to work. Maybe she'll go on an extended fishing vacation.

I don't know if I could handle the length of fishing vacation it would take. We'll be doing lots of fishing on our one or two week trip to AK next year, and I fully intend to take the laptop and see what I can get.

Thanks as always for doing this, LB.

I could not resist this pic. I got both "little beast" and "packing heat."


The author failing to detect a large predator because of poor senses. (Laos, 2003)

People are weak. I once had a semi-domesticated monkey of perhaps thirty pounds jump on me in Bali because it wanted a banana I was eating. I was a husky 180 and lifted weights. I tried to push the thing off of me, and instantly realized I couldn’t. The little beast was ferociously strong. I gave it the banana.
A man cannot outrun a toy poodle, cannot climb well (and anyway there aren’t trees in open territory), cannot swim naturally, has teeth useless as weapons, no claws, and poor musculature. (Why the latter? Strength isn’t of value in survival?) He can neither smell nor hear an approaching big cat (say) and, unless armed, couldn’t do anything about it anyway. Hiding isn’t a choice: People are noisy, their children uncontrollably so. When unwashed, humans reek. Our young are extraordinarily helpless for long years.

Were we already packing heat when we swung down from the trees?

SportsFan68 wrote:

ulysses5019 wrote:

littlebeast13 wrote:
Only 42,000 or so to go to catch Sprots....

lb13

Ok. I'll get to work. Maybe she'll go on an extended fishing vacation.

I don't know if I could handle the length of fishing vacation it would take. We'll be doing lots of fishing on our one or two week trip to AK next year, and I fully intend to take the laptop and see what I can get.

I don't think you can catch much with a laptop.

ulysses5019 wrote: I don't think you can catch much with a laptop.

Your dulcet tones, if I'm lucky.

Er, diction.

Uh, typing.

Oh, heck -- I don't know what I mean, how are y'all gonna?

I didn't even realize this was out. But I'm still a boring basic black. --Bob

SportsFan68 wrote: I could not resist this pic. I got both "little beast" and "packing heat."

You've outdone yourself this week, Sprots! Marvellous commentary and a very curious picture. I wonder if there's some distortion in that from using a wide-angle lens or if the Laotians really did build it to resemble a giant jack-o-lantern?

MarleysGh0st wrote:

SportsFan68 wrote: I could not resist this pic. I got both "little beast" and "packing heat."

You've outdone yourself this week, Sprots! Marvellous commentary and a very curious picture. I wonder if there's some distortion in that from using a wide-angle lens or if the Laotians really did build it to resemble a giant jack-o-lantern?

I think it's the Great Pumpkin.

ulysses5019 wrote:

MarleysGh0st wrote:

SportsFan68 wrote: I could not resist this pic. I got both "little beast" and "packing heat."

You've outdone yourself this week, Sprots! Marvellous commentary and a very curious picture. I wonder if there's some distortion in that from using a wide-angle lens or if the Laotians really did build it to resemble a giant jack-o-lantern?

I think it's the Great Pumpkin.

Ah, of course!

I wonder why Linus never told us that the Great Pumpkin was a Laotian deity?

MarleysGh0st wrote:

ulysses5019 wrote:

MarleysGh0st wrote: You've outdone yourself this week, Sprots! Marvellous commentary and a very curious picture. I wonder if there's some distortion in that from using a wide-angle lens or if the Laotians really did build it to resemble a giant jack-o-lantern?

I think it's the Great Pumpkin.

Ah, of course!

I wonder why Linus never told us that the Great Pumpkin was a Laotian deity?

Because he's too busy, that's why!

SportsFan68 wrote: A man cannot outrun a toy poodle . . .

Words cannot express how delighted herjosie was when I showed her this ! She's still running laps around the yard.

hermillion wrote:

SportsFan68 wrote: A man cannot outrun a toy poodle . . .

Words cannot express how delighted herjosie was when I showed her this ! She's still running laps around the yard.

Always delighted when I can make the day of one of Casey's colleagues.

Casey loves Herjosie -- someone who's smaller than she is!

Everybody on our Fourth of July trip was at least twice her size, except the whippet. He was only about 50% bigger.