This is KANSAS...HELLO?
Geez, I give up!

fuzzy (Marley may I have permission to grumble?)
Certainly!fuzzywuzzy wrote:fuzzy (Marley may I have permission to grumble?)
We were away from the house all evening, so we didn't have any kids come to our house. We did, however, have a "fall festival" at our church and invited children from the local homeless shelter to come. Our own children also dressed up in costume - there was one Hannah Montana, a Superman and a Flash (too bad we couldn't get them to race to find out which one is faster), a Spider-Man, several pirates, and assorted other costumes.fuzzywuzzy wrote:Came to my door last night with Toto!
This is KANSAS...HELLO?
Geez, I give up!![]()
fuzzy (Marley may I have permission to grumble?)
We call it "Eve of All Saints", which technically it is. Dressing up in costume was encouraged for the "Trunk or Treat" and the games we had, but the costumes weren't supposed to be scary ones.MarleysGh0st wrote:So your church has objections to "Halloween," but not to children dressing up in costume on October 31?Rexer25 wrote:They done moved to Texas. We saw four last night at our church's Fall Festival.
Not to speak for Rexer or Ear, but I can explain the thought process of my church (and my wife and I).MarleysGh0st wrote:So your church has objections to "Halloween," but not to children dressing up in costume on October 31?
That's pretty close to the reasoning our church chose to do this - and because it (Halloween) was on a Wednesday, a church night (for Baptists, anyway). The kids didn't have to choose between coming to church and getting treats. Plus, as I mentioned, we invited kids from a homeless shelter - they have enough scariness in their lives without having to deal with gory costumes and such.Appa23 wrote:Not to speak for Rexer or Ear, but I can explain the thought process of my church (and my wife and I).MarleysGh0st wrote:So your church has objections to "Halloween," but not to children dressing up in costume on October 31?
We want to give kids a safer alternative. So, they can come to church, play games, see a puppet show, and gets lots of candy, while their parents do not need to worry about the cold, getting hit by cars, or wierdos doing something to the candy.
This makes it sound like he did not have a parent with him????????fuzzywuzzy wrote:Not only, did I NOT have a Dorothy & Toto, I had this yougun who was maybe...hmm, 4 or 5 years old. He wanted more & more candy, and I told him, "I have to save some for the other children who come to my door" He then proceeded to give me a dirty look, and walked down my stairs.
Ah, hmm, his parents must be so proud of their little guy!![]()
fuzzy
That's the reasoning our church used as well. They don't say anything about costumes, or scariness, just let the kids come and have a good, safe time. The decision was made to have a '50s theme, so our girls put on poodle skirts.Appa23 wrote:Not to speak for Rexer or Ear, but I can explain the thought process of my church (and my wife and I).MarleysGh0st wrote:So your church has objections to "Halloween," but not to children dressing up in costume on October 31?
We want to give kids a safer alternative. So, they can come to church, play games, see a puppet show, and gets lots of candy, while their parents do not need to worry about the cold, getting hit by cars, or wierdos doing something to the candy.
Fine.Rexer25 wrote: That's the reasoning our church used as well. They don't say anything about costumes, or scariness, just let the kids come and have a good, safe time. The decision was made to have a '50s theme, so our girls put on poodle skirts.
You are EVIL, mini!minimetoo26 wrote:(Rain Man had a Jason mask and a chainsaw, and when he jumped out at me, I tickled him under the chin the way I do at home, and he stopped and said "YOU'RE not a visitor!" But I had put on a black robe and a mask so the kids wouldn't go easy on me...)
You won't hear any from me. Christmas is too significant a season to be secularized, sanitized, etc. Plus as a strong separationist, I think schools shouldn't be involved in patently religious emphases.MarleysGh0st wrote:Fine.
But the word "Halloween" has been replaced with "Fall Festival".
I just don't want to hear any complaints when we enter the "Winter Festival" season in December.
minimetoo26 wrote:Huh. We don't stay home, since we get one Trick-or-Treater every two years, on average. I used to leave a bowl of candy on the porch, and return to find it untouched. And we're talking giant-sized Pixy Stix!
MarleysGh0st wrote:You are EVIL, mini!minimetoo26 wrote:(Rain Man had a Jason mask and a chainsaw, and when he jumped out at me, I tickled him under the chin the way I do at home, and he stopped and said "YOU'RE not a visitor!" But I had put on a black robe and a mask so the kids wouldn't go easy on me...)![]()
I'm sorry I missed the haunted backyard. Sounds great!
This year we gave up on leaving out candy. But we still bought two bags on fun-size candy bars. And they're almost gone. Okay--ALL the Snickers are gonelittlebeast13 wrote:minimetoo26 wrote:Huh. We don't stay home, since we get one Trick-or-Treater every two years, on average. I used to leave a bowl of candy on the porch, and return to find it untouched. And we're talking giant-sized Pixy Stix!
Sure, now you tell me! You wouldn't even have returned to find the bowl had I known....
Then again, I'd have had to have gotten out of bed before 8:30 last night....
lb13
I heard a comedian comment that whoever shrunk candy bars and renamed them "fun" size should be keelhauled.minimetoo26 wrote:This year we gave up on leaving out candy. But we still bought two bags on fun-size candy bars. And they're almost gone. Okay--ALL the Snickers are goneand most of the other stuff is evaporating. But my kids don't go out collecting, so they can have treats at home...
They are the root of all evil! I wouldn't open a big Snickers, but think nothing of eating 4 little ones, when the serving size clearly reads "3". They should be renamed "Sneaky Size"....MarleysGh0st wrote:I'll vote for that!earendel wrote: I heard a comedian comment that whoever shrunk candy bars and renamed them "fun" size should be keelhauled.