WWTBAM Bored

are some real winners.

wbtravis007 wrote: ↑

Thu May 18, 2023 7:20 pm

are some real winners.

You talking about Steele, Carroll, Blasey Ford, Dunphy, or someone else?

BackInTex wrote: ↑

Fri May 19, 2023 10:03 am

wbtravis007 wrote: ↑

Thu May 18, 2023 7:20 pm

are some real winners.

You talking about Steele, Carroll, Blasey Ford, Dunphy, or someone else?

You left out the CIA whistleblower (possibly Eric Ciaramella) whose revelations got Trump impeached. The GOP has had so many scandals that it's hard to keep them straight.

BackInTex wrote: ↑

Fri May 19, 2023 10:03 am

wbtravis007 wrote: ↑

Thu May 18, 2023 7:20 pm

are some real winners.

You talking about Steele, Carroll, Blasey Ford, Dunphy, or someone else?

I think he's talking about the witnesses who admitted under oath that they were paid by one of Donny's advisors. --Bob

Bob78164 wrote: ↑

Fri May 19, 2023 10:43 am

BackInTex wrote: ↑

Fri May 19, 2023 10:03 am

wbtravis007 wrote: ↑

Thu May 18, 2023 7:20 pm

are some real winners.

You talking about Steele, Carroll, Blasey Ford, Dunphy, or someone else?

I think he's talking about the witnesses who admitted under oath that they were paid by one of Donny's advisors. --Bob

I will say that, in my opinion, "the oath" doesn't mean squat to most of the folks on your side of the aisle. Whatever it takes. I'm sure somewhere there is a "fingers were crossed" out they have set aside to make themselves feel better.

BackInTex wrote: ↑

Fri May 19, 2023 3:37 pm

Bob78164 wrote: ↑

Fri May 19, 2023 10:43 am

BackInTex wrote: ↑

Fri May 19, 2023 10:03 am

You talking about Steele, Carroll, Blasey Ford, Dunphy, or someone else?

I think he's talking about the witnesses who admitted under oath that they were paid by one of Donny's advisors. --Bob

I will say that, in my opinion, "the oath" doesn't mean squat to most of the folks on your side of the aisle. Whatever it takes. I'm sure somewhere there is a "fingers were crossed" out they have set aside to make themselves feel better.

I guess one way to avoid coping with facts that you find inconvenient is by adamantly refusing to accept them no matter what. We could call that faith-based politics, because no amount of contrary evidence will ever convince you. --Bob

Bob78164 wrote: ↑

Fri May 19, 2023 4:21 pm

BackInTex wrote: ↑

Fri May 19, 2023 3:37 pm

Bob78164 wrote: ↑

Fri May 19, 2023 10:43 am

I think he's talking about the witnesses who admitted under oath that they were paid by one of Donny's advisors. --Bob

I will say that, in my opinion, "the oath" doesn't mean squat to most of the folks on your side of the aisle. Whatever it takes. I'm sure somewhere there is a "fingers were crossed" out they have set aside to make themselves feel better.

I guess one way to avoid coping with facts that you find inconvenient is by adamantly refusing to accept them no matter what. We could call that faith-based politics, because no amount of contrary evidence will ever convince you. --Bob

What evidence? The Durham report? You and your side completely disregard it and what it means.

Bob78164 wrote: ↑

Fri May 19, 2023 4:21 pm

BackInTex wrote: ↑

Fri May 19, 2023 3:37 pm

Bob78164 wrote: ↑

Fri May 19, 2023 10:43 am

I think he's talking about the witnesses who admitted under oath that they were paid by one of Donny's advisors. --Bob

I will say that, in my opinion, "the oath" doesn't mean squat to most of the folks on your side of the aisle. Whatever it takes. I'm sure somewhere there is a "fingers were crossed" out they have set aside to make themselves feel better.

I guess one way to avoid coping with facts that you find inconvenient is by adamantly refusing to accept them no matter what. We could call that faith-based politics, because no amount of contrary evidence will ever convince you. --Bob

Mirror much?

wbtravis007 wrote: ↑

Thu May 18, 2023 7:20 pm

are some real winners.

The dem questioners were wonderful too.

We found one of your tweets where you said Pelosi orchestrated 1/6. What do you have to say about that, you insurrectionist, Trump loving traitor?

That's not my tweet....

Uh, ok, but you agree with that, right?

No.

But that's ok with you, I'm sure. She had the right idea and her heart's in the right place, even if she proved herself an imbecile. You'll just let that go and not extrapolate it on anything else coming from her or her comrades. She thinks (or doesn't think) just like you do (or don't).

jarnon wrote: ↑

Fri May 19, 2023 10:17 am

You left out the CIA leaker (possibly Eric Ciaramella) whose revelations got Trump impeached. The GOP has had so many scandals fabricated against them that it's hard to keep them straight.

Fixed it for you