Boy, these so-called whistleblowers

[wbtravis007]

are some real winners.

[BackInTex]

are some real winners.

You talking about Steele, Carroll, Blasey Ford, Dunphy, or someone else?

[jarnon]

are some real winners.

You talking about Steele, Carroll, Blasey Ford, Dunphy, or someone else?

You left out the CIA whistleblower (possibly Eric Ciaramella) whose revelations got Trump impeached. The GOP has had so many scandals that it's hard to keep them straight.

[Bob78164]

are some real winners.

You talking about Steele, Carroll, Blasey Ford, Dunphy, or someone else?

I think he's talking about the witnesses who admitted under oath that they were paid by one of Donny's advisors. --Bob

[BackInTex]

are some real winners.

You talking about Steele, Carroll, Blasey Ford, Dunphy, or someone else?

I think he's talking about the witnesses who admitted under oath that they were paid by one of Donny's advisors. --Bob

I will say that, in my opinion, "the oath" doesn't mean squat to most of the folks on your side of the aisle. Whatever it takes. I'm sure somewhere there is a "fingers were crossed" out they have set aside to make themselves feel better.

[Bob78164]

You talking about Steele, Carroll, Blasey Ford, Dunphy, or someone else?

I think he's talking about the witnesses who admitted under oath that they were paid by one of Donny's advisors. --Bob

I will say that, in my opinion, "the oath" doesn't mean squat to most of the folks on your side of the aisle. Whatever it takes. I'm sure somewhere there is a "fingers were crossed" out they have set aside to make themselves feel better.

I guess one way to avoid coping with facts that you find inconvenient is by adamantly refusing to accept them no matter what. We could call that faith-based politics, because no amount of contrary evidence will ever convince you. --Bob

[BackInTex]

I think he's talking about the witnesses who admitted under oath that they were paid by one of Donny's advisors. --Bob

I will say that, in my opinion, "the oath" doesn't mean squat to most of the folks on your side of the aisle. Whatever it takes. I'm sure somewhere there is a "fingers were crossed" out they have set aside to make themselves feel better.

I guess one way to avoid coping with facts that you find inconvenient is by adamantly refusing to accept them no matter what. We could call that faith-based politics, because no amount of contrary evidence will ever convince you. --Bob

What evidence? The Durham report? You and your side completely disregard it and what it means.

[Beebs52]

I think he's talking about the witnesses who admitted under oath that they were paid by one of Donny's advisors. --Bob

I will say that, in my opinion, "the oath" doesn't mean squat to most of the folks on your side of the aisle. Whatever it takes. I'm sure somewhere there is a "fingers were crossed" out they have set aside to make themselves feel better.

I guess one way to avoid coping with facts that you find inconvenient is by adamantly refusing to accept them no matter what. We could call that faith-based politics, because no amount of contrary evidence will ever convince you. --Bob

Mirror much?

[flockofseagulls104]

are some real winners.

The dem questioners were wonderful too.

We found one of your tweets where you said Pelosi orchestrated 1/6. What do you have to say about that, you insurrectionist, Trump loving traitor?

That's not my tweet....

Uh, ok, but you agree with that, right?

No.

But that's ok with you, I'm sure. She had the right idea and her heart's in the right place, even if she proved herself an imbecile. You'll just let that go and not extrapolate it on anything else coming from her or her comrades. She thinks (or doesn't think) just like you do (or don't).

[flockofseagulls104]

You left out the CIA leaker (possibly Eric Ciaramella) whose revelations got Trump impeached. The GOP has had so many scandals fabricated against them that it's hard to keep them straight.

Fixed it for you