Your cash is no good or What do WWTBAM and the $20 in your

The forum for general posting. Come join the madness. :)
Message
Author
User avatar
themanintheseersuckersuit
Posts: 7634
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:37 pm
Location: South Carolina

Your cash is no good or What do WWTBAM and the $20 in your

#1 Post by themanintheseersuckersuit » Tue May 20, 2008 9:33 am

wallet have in common


they both discriminate against the handicapped
WASHINGTON — The U.S. discriminates against blind people by printing paper money that makes it impossible for them to distinguish the bills' value, a federal appeals court ruled Tuesday.

The ruling upholds a decision by a lower court in 2006. It could force the Treasury Department to redesign its money. Suggested changes have ranged from making bills different sizes to printing them with raised markings.

The U.S. acknowledges that the design hinders blind people but it argued they had adapted —some relied on store clerks for help, some used credit cards and others folded certain corners to help distinguish the bills.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,356727,00.html
Suitguy is not bitter.

feels he represents the many educated and rational onlookers who believe that the hysterical denouncement of lay scepticism is both unwarranted and counter-productive

The problem, then, is that such calls do not address an opposition audience so much as they signal virtue. They talk past those who need convincing. They ignore actual facts and counterargument. And they are irreparably smug.

User avatar
BackInTex
Posts: 13588
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:43 pm
Location: In Texas of course!

Re: Your cash is no good or What do WWTBAM and the $20 in yo

#2 Post by BackInTex » Tue May 20, 2008 9:56 am

themanintheseersuckersuit wrote:wallet have in common


they both discriminate against the handicapped
WASHINGTON — The U.S. discriminates against blind people by printing paper money that makes it impossible for them to distinguish the bills' value, a federal appeals court ruled Tuesday.

The ruling upholds a decision by a lower court in 2006. It could force the Treasury Department to redesign its money. Suggested changes have ranged from making bills different sizes to printing them with raised markings.

The U.S. acknowledges that the design hinders blind people but it argued they had adapted —some relied on store clerks for help, some used credit cards and others folded certain corners to help distinguish the bills.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,356727,00.html
In other news, US 5th Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that all public buildings must remove all artwork, light bulbs, stairways, colored or patterned wallpaper, and any device that emits a sound such as an elevetore that 'dings', speakers for announcements or music, as they are 'discriminating' against blind and/or deaf persons.

Also, any ornamental design on the exterior of buildings must be removed as blind people can not appreciate that and it would be unfair for other to be able to appreciate it when they can not.
..what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? let them take arms.
~~ Thomas Jefferson

War is where the government tells you who the bad guy is.
Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
-- Benjamin Franklin (maybe)

User avatar
Bob Juch
Posts: 27070
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
Contact:

#3 Post by Bob Juch » Tue May 20, 2008 10:15 am

WWTBAM certainly doesn't discriminate against physically handicapped people, but if they did it would be permitted under law as quiz show contestants may be "cast".
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)

Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.

Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.

User avatar
fantine33
Posts: 1299
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 6:15 pm

#4 Post by fantine33 » Tue May 20, 2008 11:20 am

To me, this seems like an insult against blind people. There has always been a fairly simple system used: Singles remain flat, fives are folded in half and 20s are folded lengthwise.

So are they now saying that the blind have recently become too stupid to keep this straight?

For the smart ass who is sure to ask "what about a hundy?", it gets folded in half twice and tucked into the secret compartment that sighted people use for condoms.

User avatar
ne1410s
Posts: 2961
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 5:26 pm
Location: The Friendly Confines

#5 Post by ne1410s » Tue May 20, 2008 11:22 am

This ranks right up there with Braille on the drive-thru ATM.
"When you argue with a fool, there are two fools in the argument."

User avatar
MarleysGh0st
Posts: 27966
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:55 am
Location: Elsewhere

#6 Post by MarleysGh0st » Tue May 20, 2008 11:29 am

fantine33 wrote:To me, this seems like an insult against blind people. There has always been a fairly simple system used: Singles remain flat, fives are folded in half and 20s are folded lengthwise.

So are they now saying that the blind have recently become too stupid to keep this straight?
I believe that the point is that they are compelled to trust the honesty of every person who ever hands them change, since those bills don't come pre-folded.

User avatar
TheConfessor
Posts: 6462
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 1:11 pm

#7 Post by TheConfessor » Tue May 20, 2008 11:30 am

fantine33 wrote:To me, this seems like an insult against blind people. There has always been a fairly simple system used: Singles remain flat, fives are folded in half and 20s are folded lengthwise.

So are they now saying that the blind have recently become too stupid to keep this straight?

For the smart ass who is sure to ask "what about a hundy?", it gets folded in half twice and tucked into the secret compartment that sighted people use for condoms.
And what is their system for knowing that they received the correct bills as change when they make a purchase?

User avatar
fantine33
Posts: 1299
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 6:15 pm

#8 Post by fantine33 » Tue May 20, 2008 11:38 am

TheConfessor wrote:
fantine33 wrote:To me, this seems like an insult against blind people. There has always been a fairly simple system used: Singles remain flat, fives are folded in half and 20s are folded lengthwise.

So are they now saying that the blind have recently become too stupid to keep this straight?

For the smart ass who is sure to ask "what about a hundy?", it gets folded in half twice and tucked into the secret compartment that sighted people use for condoms.
And what is their system for knowing that they received the correct bills as change when they make a purchase?
It's easiest to use a denomination close enough to the total so that any paper you receive in change will be singles. If that's not possible, then you know what the bills will be as the cashier counts it back to you. The largest will be on top.

I admit that this was before the 'dump it in your hand and announce the total', but this is basically argumentative and not really worth refitting all the US Mints. Plus, with the advent of plastic, there's really no reason to pay for anything in cash that's over ten bucks.

User avatar
fantine33
Posts: 1299
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 6:15 pm

#9 Post by fantine33 » Tue May 20, 2008 11:40 am

MarleysGh0st wrote:
fantine33 wrote:To me, this seems like an insult against blind people. There has always been a fairly simple system used: Singles remain flat, fives are folded in half and 20s are folded lengthwise.

So are they now saying that the blind have recently become too stupid to keep this straight?
I believe that the point is that they are compelled to trust the honesty of every person who ever hands them change, since those bills don't come pre-folded.
I know this is funny coming from me, the most untrusting and cynical person on the planet, but I'd like to think that the vast majority of people are mostly honest when it comes to something like that, especially a cashier that's just handing you a couple bucks.

And I'm not talking about there being a special level of hell for cheating a blind person out of five bucks, I'm talking about a basic, natural response for doing something correctly.

User avatar
TheConfessor
Posts: 6462
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 1:11 pm

#10 Post by TheConfessor » Tue May 20, 2008 11:42 am

fantine33 wrote:Plus, with the advent of plastic, there's really no reason to pay for anything in cash that's over ten bucks.
Most hookers and dealers prefer cash. Or so I hear.

User avatar
Appa23
Posts: 3770
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:04 pm

#11 Post by Appa23 » Tue May 20, 2008 11:45 am

TheConfessor wrote:
fantine33 wrote:To me, this seems like an insult against blind people. There has always been a fairly simple system used: Singles remain flat, fives are folded in half and 20s are folded lengthwise.

So are they now saying that the blind have recently become too stupid to keep this straight?

For the smart ass who is sure to ask "what about a hundy?", it gets folded in half twice and tucked into the secret compartment that sighted people use for condoms.
And what is their system for knowing that they received the correct bills as change when they make a purchase?
They use a debit card?

There is some interesting debate over this decision.

For one, the lawsuit apparently was opposed by the leading advocacy organization for blind and visually impaired Americans. In a paraphrase of what was a very poignant quote, a spokedman said that efforts should be made to get money into the pockets of blind people, not fooling around with how that money appears.

Second, the court apparently did not consider the burden placed upon third parties, as is required, if changes have to be made to the currency. More specifically, the cost to vending machine manufacturers who could have to re-design their machines to handle bills of different sizes or "textures", for example.

Lastly, as decisions in Rehab Act cases tend to become precedent for ADA cases, there is concern that this will encourage lawsuits against companies because their websites are not "accessible" to blind people. There laready has been a publicized lawsuit gainst Target.

Interesting legal issue(s).

User avatar
fantine33
Posts: 1299
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 6:15 pm

#12 Post by fantine33 » Tue May 20, 2008 11:47 am

TheConfessor wrote:
fantine33 wrote:Plus, with the advent of plastic, there's really no reason to pay for anything in cash that's over ten bucks.
Most hookers and dealers prefer cash. Or so I hear.
That's when you pull the c-notes out of the condom slot.

User avatar
littlebeast13
Dumbass
Posts: 31521
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 7:20 pm
Location: Between the Sterilite and the Farberware
Contact:

#13 Post by littlebeast13 » Tue May 20, 2008 11:51 am

I'm already ordering a Braille Where's George? stamp.....

Don't want to be thought of as uncaring.....

lb13

User avatar
Blind Beast
Merry Man
Posts: 61
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 6:56 am
Location: I have no idea

#14 Post by Blind Beast » Tue May 20, 2008 11:54 am

littlebeast13 wrote:I'm already ordering a Braille Where's George? stamp.....

Don't want to be thought of as uncaring.....

lb13

Cool! Now I can play along too!

Has anyone seen my wallet?
I can't see! I can't see!

User avatar
George Fox
Merry Man
Posts: 47
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 11:57 am
Location: The Comeback Trail

#15 Post by George Fox » Tue May 20, 2008 12:03 pm

TheConfessor wrote:
fantine33 wrote:Plus, with the advent of plastic, there's really no reason to pay for anything in cash that's over ten bucks.
Most hookers and dealers prefer cash. Or so I hear.
All I gotta say is Be careful of your paper trail"
If you are visually impaired or cannot otherwise read this code please contact the Administrator for help.

User avatar
CharlesFoxSingers
Merry Man
Posts: 85
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 1:28 pm
Location: At the mic

George? Are we related?

#16 Post by CharlesFoxSingers » Tue May 20, 2008 12:12 pm

Every time I look at you, I go blind.
(Every time I look at you, I go blind.)
Every time I look at you, I go blind.
(Every time I look at you, I go blind.)

In the mornin' I get up, and I try to
Feel alive, but I can't.

(Every time I look at you, I go blind.)

I don't know what it is.
Something in me just won't give me a chance.

I think it's that I feel more confused
By the deal love has shown me.

Little child, did you know that there's a light,
And it's gonna shine right through your eyes.
What do you think that life is like?
Every time I look at you, I go blind.
I go blind

Well, some where over there there's a purpose,
There's a care for free.
In me there's no body, no one plan,
No one stand to be free.

I think it's that because I have seen all the fuss
And it's no big deal. No big deal.

Hold me, hold me 'cause I want to get higher and higher
(Every time I look at you I go blind)
Higher than--
Hold me, hold me 'cause I want to get higher and higher
(Every time I look at you I go blind)
Higher than--
Hold me, hold me 'cause I want to get higher and higher
(Every time I look at you I go blind)
Higher than--
Hold me, hold me 'cause I want to get higher and higher
(Every time I look at you I go blind)
Higher than--
Hold me, hold me 'cause I want to get higher and higher
(Every time I look at you I go blind)
Higher than life.

User avatar
earendel
Posts: 13871
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:25 am
Location: mired in the bureaucracy

#17 Post by earendel » Tue May 20, 2008 12:57 pm

ne1410s wrote:This ranks right up there with Braille on the drive-thru ATM.
My wife, who drove a taxi for a few years, explained that to me. It was, she said, to permit blind people taking a taxi to the bank to enter their own PINs without having to tell the driver. It was a security/trust issue as well as an accessibility issue.
"Elen sila lumenn omentielvo...A star shines on the hour of our meeting."

User avatar
nitrah55
Posts: 1613
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:46 am
Location: Section 239, Yankee Stadium

#18 Post by nitrah55 » Tue May 20, 2008 1:43 pm

I don't know from discriminatory, but I've always thought it, well, dumb, that US bills are all the same size and basically the same color.

It's too darn easy to hand someone a 5 when you want to hand them a 20, or vice versa.

Other countries manage with varied sizes and colors. And they put people other than politicians on their money.
I am about 25% sure of this.

User avatar
ulysses5019
Purveyor of Avatars
Posts: 19442
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:52 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA

#19 Post by ulysses5019 » Tue May 20, 2008 1:58 pm

nitrah55 wrote:I don't know from discriminatory, but I've always thought it, well, dumb, that US bills are all the same size and basically the same color.

It's too darn easy to hand someone a 5 when you want to hand them a 20, or vice versa.

Other countries manage with varied sizes and colors. And they put people other than politicians on their money.

Which is a nice segue into last night's winning question for bar trivia:

The category was "money:

Who is the only living American athlete who is on a Scottish bank note?
I believe in the usefulness of useless information.

User avatar
tanstaafl2
Posts: 3494
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 4:45 pm
Location: I dunno. Let me check Google maps.

#20 Post by tanstaafl2 » Tue May 20, 2008 2:07 pm

ulysses5019 wrote:
nitrah55 wrote:I don't know from discriminatory, but I've always thought it, well, dumb, that US bills are all the same size and basically the same color.

It's too darn easy to hand someone a 5 when you want to hand them a 20, or vice versa.

Other countries manage with varied sizes and colors. And they put people other than politicians on their money.

Which is a nice segue into last night's winning question for bar trivia:

The category was "money:

Who is the only living American athlete who is on a Scottish bank note?
Spoiler
Jack Nicklaus had one with his picture on it a few years back at St. Andrews. I seem to remember it was a an oversized commemorative kind of thing but perhaps it was also made as legal tender.
If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and a man.
~Mark Twain

Some people are like a Slinky. They are not really good for anything, but you still can't help but smile when you shove them down the stairs...
~tanstaafl2

Nullum Gratuitum Prandium
Ne Illegitimi Carborundum
Cumann na gClann Uí Thighearnaigh

User avatar
silvercamaro
Dog's Best Friend
Posts: 9608
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:45 am

#21 Post by silvercamaro » Tue May 20, 2008 2:07 pm

ulysses5019 wrote:
Which is a nice segue into last night's winning question for bar trivia:

The category was "money:

Who is the only living American athlete who is on a Scottish bank note?
I know that the answer is Jack Nicklaus, but I cannot figure out his connection to Scotland, apart from golf. Maybe that's enough.

User avatar
ulysses5019
Purveyor of Avatars
Posts: 19442
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:52 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA

#22 Post by ulysses5019 » Tue May 20, 2008 2:08 pm

tanstaafl2 wrote:
ulysses5019 wrote:
nitrah55 wrote:I don't know from discriminatory, but I've always thought it, well, dumb, that US bills are all the same size and basically the same color.

It's too darn easy to hand someone a 5 when you want to hand them a 20, or vice versa.

Other countries manage with varied sizes and colors. And they put people other than politicians on their money.

Which is a nice segue into last night's winning question for bar trivia:

The category was "money:

Who is the only living American athlete who is on a Scottish bank note?
Spoiler
Jack Nicklaus had one with his picture on it a few years back at St. Andrews. I seem to remember it was a an oversized commemorative kind of thing but perhaps it was also made as legal tender.
Spoiler
I believe in the usefulness of useless information.

User avatar
Bob Juch
Posts: 27070
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
Contact:

#23 Post by Bob Juch » Tue May 20, 2008 2:28 pm

silvercamaro wrote:
ulysses5019 wrote:
Which is a nice segue into last night's winning question for bar trivia:

The category was "money:

Who is the only living American athlete who is on a Scottish bank note?
I know that the answer is Jack Nicklaus, but I cannot figure out his connection to Scotland, apart from golf. Maybe that's enough.
Winning the British Open twice was enough for them to issue a commemorative £5 note.
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)

Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.

Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.

User avatar
MarleysGh0st
Posts: 27966
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:55 am
Location: Elsewhere

#24 Post by MarleysGh0st » Tue May 20, 2008 2:31 pm

Bob Juch wrote:Winning the British Open twice was enough for them to issue a commemorative £5 note.
Commemorative banknotes? Those are just bigger versions of collectible stamps! :P

User avatar
Appa23
Posts: 3770
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:04 pm

#25 Post by Appa23 » Tue May 20, 2008 2:33 pm

Bob Juch wrote:
silvercamaro wrote:
ulysses5019 wrote:
Which is a nice segue into last night's winning question for bar trivia:

The category was "money:

Who is the only living American athlete who is on a Scottish bank note?
I know that the answer is Jack Nicklaus, but I cannot figure out his connection to Scotland, apart from golf. Maybe that's enough.
Winning the British Open twice was enough for them to issue a commemorative £5 note.
On the off-chance that you get asked the question on the radio trivia show, he won three Open Championships:

1966 at Muirfield
1970 at St. Andrews
1978 at St. Andrews.

Post Reply