WWTBAM Bored

This seems to work more with girls than with guys.

But from personal observation of a surprising number of lesbian relationships in the area.

A common factor seems to be a VERY unattractive female finding another VERY unattractive female-Or being in a vulnerable state and found by a real lesbian.

It is patently obvious that if a guy had paid attention to these VERY unattractive girls they would not be "Lesbians" and would, instead, be in a heterosexual relationship.

Spock wrote: ↑

Wed Jun 29, 2022 9:59 am

This seems to work more with girls than with guys.

But from personal observation of a surprising number of lesbian relationships in the area.

A common factor seems to be a VERY unattractive female finding another VERY unattractive female-Or being in a vulnerable state and found by a real lesbian.

It is patently obvious that if a guy had paid attention to these VERY unattractive girls they would not be "Lesbians" and would, instead, be in a heterosexual relationship.

I think you probably will find, according to the rules of political correctness, you cannot say any female is unattractive, much less very unattractive, even though they really are from any objective viewpoint. Just like you can't say any female is FAT, even though they are, or you will be 'shaming' them. And you will be a 'bad, insensitive person'.

If bob has recovered from his brief bout of being reasonable, and he knows a female who is unattractive (which is a given, because he knows everything), expect to be called out very heavily about this post.

Spock wrote: ↑

Wed Jun 29, 2022 9:59 am

This seems to work more with girls than with guys.

But from personal observation of a surprising number of lesbian relationships in the area.

A common factor seems to be a VERY unattractive female finding another VERY unattractive female-Or being in a vulnerable state and found by a real lesbian.

It is patently obvious that if a guy had paid attention to these VERY unattractive girls they would not be "Lesbians" and would, instead, be in a heterosexual relationship.

You're way out of your depth.

bazodee wrote: ↑

Wed Jun 29, 2022 10:33 am

Spock wrote: ↑

Wed Jun 29, 2022 9:59 am

This seems to work more with girls than with guys.

But from personal observation of a surprising number of lesbian relationships in the area.

A common factor seems to be a VERY unattractive female finding another VERY unattractive female-Or being in a vulnerable state and found by a real lesbian.

It is patently obvious that if a guy had paid attention to these VERY unattractive girls they would not be "Lesbians" and would, instead, be in a heterosexual relationship.

You're way out of your depth.

I nominate you for captain of the BB debate team.

Spock has a point, and here is a link that affirms his observations by other observers. See number 3.

https://womenosophy.com/reasons-women-l ... ationships

I would add to this list that gender fluidity has become a status symbol among a certain sector of our culture.

Just My Opinion.

flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑

Wed Jun 29, 2022 10:50 am

Spock has a point, and here is a link that affirms his observations by other observers. See number 3.

https://womenosophy.com/reasons-women-l ... ationships

Kate Gitman, the author of this "article" has also written other articles for this website such as 9 Mistakes to Avoid When Texting Your Crush, 8 Reasons Getting Dumped Is Actually Amazing, 7 Rules to Be Successful in Every Avenue of Life, 8 Reasons Why Your Shortcomings Make You Better, and 9 Fun and Unusual Activities to Try in July. Sounds exactly like an expert in human sexuality. And here's what one of the commenters had to say about the Lesbian Relationship article:

As a lesbian, I can say that this article is 1000% bullshit. I'm not gay because I'm ugly and it didn't work out with the boys; ninety percent of my friends are wonderful young men with whom I have very close, affectionate, and comfortable friendships, better than with most of my female acquaintances. I'm not a straight girl who got disillusioned with men, because thousands of disillusioned straight girls already exist who are - gasp - straight, not gay. I'm gay because I'm sexually attracted to women, not boys. Do you even know any lesbians in real life? I mean did you get this article by eating a bunch of homophobic Internet shitposts and pulling the digested remains out of your ass or something? This is utter nonsense. I'm disgusted.

According to Statscrop, Womenosophy ranks 1,269,299 in terms of website traffic. But that's deceiving. They had 300 visitors on one day and virtually nothing before or since, which indicates that someone on a more popular site linked to them. Even my site does better than that (258,613). And this "Kate Gitman" has no web presence.

https://www.statscrop.com/www/womenosophy.com

Spock wrote: ↑

Wed Jun 29, 2022 9:59 am

It is patently obvious that if a guy had paid attention to these VERY unattractive girls they would not be "Lesbians" and would, instead, be in a heterosexual relationship.

Just curious. Did any of these "VERY unattractive girls" tell you why they were lesbians instead of in a heterosexual relationship?

What I can tell you from personal observation of a surprising number of heterosexual relationships in the area is that there are many couples in which one partner appears to me to be considerably more attractive than the other. I haven't inquired of them why they are in their relationship for the simple reason that it's none of my business.

Spock wrote: ↑

Wed Jun 29, 2022 9:59 am

This seems to work more with girls than with guys.

But from personal observation of a surprising number of lesbian relationships in the area.

A common factor seems to be a VERY unattractive female finding another VERY unattractive female-Or being in a vulnerable state and found by a real lesbian.

It is patently obvious that if a guy had paid attention to these VERY unattractive girls they would not be "Lesbians" and would, instead, be in a heterosexual relationship.

I dunno, Spock. You're pretty fucking ugly, but it doesn't seem to have turned you gay. Are you suggesting that if you hadn't been able to get laid in college, you might have tried boys? --Bob

I have no words.

Spock wrote: ↑

Wed Jun 29, 2022 9:59 am

This seems to work more with girls than with guys.

But from personal observation of a surprising number of lesbian relationships in the area.

A common factor seems to be a VERY unattractive female finding another VERY unattractive female-Or being in a vulnerable state and found by a real lesbian.

It is patently obvious that if a guy had paid attention to these VERY unattractive girls they would not be "Lesbians" and would, instead, be in a heterosexual relationship.

This misogyny at its worst.

And I will state this question again, because no one has answered it yet. If sexuality is a choice, then when did you decide to be heterosexual?

The offensiveness of the comment aside, Gramps, I’m just scratching my head as to why you think we wanted to hear it

kroxquo wrote: ↑

Wed Jun 29, 2022 3:37 pm

Spock wrote: ↑

Wed Jun 29, 2022 9:59 am

This seems to work more with girls than with guys.

But from personal observation of a surprising number of lesbian relationships in the area.

A common factor seems to be a VERY unattractive female finding another VERY unattractive female-Or being in a vulnerable state and found by a real lesbian.

It is patently obvious that if a guy had paid attention to these VERY unattractive girls they would not be "Lesbians" and would, instead, be in a heterosexual relationship.

This misogyny at its worst.

And I will state this question again, because no one has answered it yet. If sexuality is a choice, then when did you decide to be heterosexual?

When he couldn't find a guy who'd have him. --Bob

Weyoun wrote: ↑

Wed Jun 29, 2022 8:19 pm

The offensiveness of the comment aside, Gramps, I’m just scratching my head as to why you think we wanted to hear it

Trolls revel in annoying people. That's reason enough. Pretty pathetic, really.