WWTBAM Bored

https://youtu.be/TQIL7bJ51mk

I think she says it all.
Well, actually not all. But enough.

Tell HER where she's wrong. Don't tell me.

flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑

Sun Jun 26, 2022 6:23 am

Tell HER where she's wrong. Don't tell me.

Flock finds someone new to hide behind and provide him with his ideas. At least she's more personable than Donald Trump or Tucker Carlson.

silverscreenselect wrote: ↑

Sun Jun 26, 2022 6:48 am

flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑

Sun Jun 26, 2022 6:23 am

Tell HER where she's wrong. Don't tell me.

Flock finds someone new to hide behind and provide him with his ideas. At least she's more personable than Donald Trump or Tucker Carlson.

I’ll take that response as “she’s right”. At least you and I agree on something.

silverscreenselect wrote: ↑

Sun Jun 26, 2022 6:48 am

flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑

Sun Jun 26, 2022 6:23 am

Tell HER where she's wrong. Don't tell me.

Flock finds someone new to hide behind and provide him with his ideas. At least she's more personable than Donald Trump or Tucker Carlson.

No response to the content of the video, just a swipe at me.
I specifically said 'TELL HER WHERE SHE IS WRONG". About any individual point she made or all of them. I specifically said "DON'T TELL ME".
This is why nothing that the stalker posts here should be considered with anything other than disdain.
And why I rarely, bordering on never, read or respond to his kneejerk vitriol.
And a very good indication that the stalker, for one, is the of the ilk she refers to.

flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑

Sun Jun 26, 2022 10:58 am

silverscreenselect wrote: ↑

Sun Jun 26, 2022 6:48 am

flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑

Sun Jun 26, 2022 6:23 am

Tell HER where she's wrong. Don't tell me.

Flock finds someone new to hide behind and provide him with his ideas. At least she's more personable than Donald Trump or Tucker Carlson.

No response to the content of the video, just a swipe at me.
I specifically said 'TELL HER WHERE SHE IS WRONG". About any individual point she made or all of them. I specifically said "DON'T TELL ME".
This is why nothing that the stalker posts here should be considered with anything other than disdain.
And why I rarely, bordering on never, read or respond to his kneejerk vitriol.
And a very good indication that the stalker, for one, is the of the ilk she refers to.

Well, it didn't take long. The Constitution mandates a count of the total number of persons living in each state, not the number of citizens. And no one said that illegals voting in elections was good. Only that there isn't any evidence of that occurring on a widespread basis or that it's not prosecuted when discovered.

Flock's gotten to the stage where he's too lazy to make bad arguments any more and just chooses to regurgitate someone else's Tik Tok video.

And you rarely respond to my lengthy comments because you have no reasoned response other that Dinesh D'Souza or Prager University said so.

And if you want to shut me up, it's easy.

If True the Vote or anyone ever produces any real evidence (as opposed to claims that this evidence exists but they can't produce it for a variety of reasons) of systemic election fraud in 2020, I'll shut up about that.

60 courts and assorted audits haven't found any of this evidence so far.

Since this is a Perspectives thread, I glanced at the stalker's remarks.

As always, nothing even resembling a response to the point of the thread. Just stupid, completely ignorant, and juvenile personal attacks on me.

The closest he came was about counting illegal immigrants. The point was about adding the question 'Are you a citizen?', to the census, not about counting them. To have an 'idea' you really need to be able to have a comprehension of other ideas.
No evidence 'on a widespread basis'. Boy, I think I've heard that before. So, he admits there is evidence on a limited basis. Even ONE illegal vote is wrong, and if the PTB refuse to investigate further, how are we to know how widespread it really is?

His concept of an 'idea' is using a different set of words to insult me.

flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑

Sun Jun 26, 2022 4:31 pm

So, he admits there is evidence on a limited basis. Even ONE illegal vote is wrong, and if the PTB refuse to investigate further, how are we to know how widespread it really is?

Of course, there are fraudulent votes in every election, usually people trying to vote twice in different locations. But these have been investigated and prosecuted. The notion that there might be others doesn't justify endless police investigations that can never conclusively prove there is no additional fraud.

More generally, this woman just fired off a list of generalizations and bullet points and you want Bored liberals to respond. She certainly didn't back up any of her points. It makes for an effective Tik Tok video but not for a reasoned debate.

Why don't you start the debate by demonstrating how and why any of her arguments are valid? Then we might go from there.

silverscreenselect wrote: ↑

Sun Jun 26, 2022 9:33 pm

flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑

Sun Jun 26, 2022 4:31 pm

So, he admits there is evidence on a limited basis. Even ONE illegal vote is wrong, and if the PTB refuse to investigate further, how are we to know how widespread it really is?

Of course, there are fraudulent votes in every election, usually people trying to vote twice in different locations. But these have been investigated and prosecuted. The notion that there might be others doesn't justify endless police investigations that can never conclusively prove there is no additional fraud.

More generally, this woman just fired off a list of generalizations and bullet points and you want Bored liberals to respond. She certainly didn't back up any of her points. It makes for an effective Tik Tok video but not for a reasoned debate.

Why don't you start the debate by demonstrating how and why any of her arguments are valid? Then we might go from there.

Stalker, I have seen zero evidence over many years that you have any concept of the term 'reasoned debate'.
She makes points. If you think those points are invalid, make your arguments to HER. NOT TO ME. I have expressly said these are HER OPINIONS. I never said they were mine. Can you comprehend that? I even made an exception for you to help you understand the actual process. You have to actually respond to her statements, not mischaracterizations of what she actually said. Get with the program, and STOP referring to me in your responses in this thread.