WWTBAM Bored

flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑

Thu Jun 23, 2022 10:09 pm

The count here is 50 since the leak occurred. The ACLJ counts 63, including 3 today.

https://www.ncregister.com/news/as-atta ... onse-tepid

But have no fear, the FBI is 'investigating'.

As soon as they figure out who it was that leaked the draft decision, maybe they'll get to it.

Hint: Ask the Politico reporter who leaked it to them....

First, as far as I know, there were no laws broken in leaking the draft decision to the press. This would be a matter for internal Supreme Court disciplinary procedures and possible Bar sanctions if anyone doing the leaking were a member of the Bar.

Second, from reading the article, most of the "attacks" on pro-life centers were cases of vandalism, either painting graffiti or breaking windows and the like. The FBI typically does not get involved in investigating vandalism. And, as anyone who has seen any urban area will tell you, there's a heck of a lot of vandalism that goes on, most of which doesn't get caught. That's not to excuse it by any means. It's just a matter of what and where police priorities should be.

Third, usually when arrests are made in hate graffiti cases, it's a result of someone seeing the criminals or being recorded on surveillance footage or them bragging about what they did on social media. Delays of months between incidents and arrests aren't uncommon. And police don't announce what progress they've made in ongoing cases of any sort. You learn about it when they make arrests.

flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑

Thu Jun 23, 2022 10:09 pm

The count here is 50 since the leak occurred. The ACLJ counts 63, including 3 today.

https://www.ncregister.com/news/as-atta ... onse-tepid

But have no fear, the FBI is 'investigating'.

As soon as they figure out who it was that leaked the draft decision, maybe they'll get to it.

Hint: Ask the Politico reporter who leaked it to them....

The FBI is not investigating the leak. Chief Justice Roberts has kept the investigation internal and since there was no crime committed they don't have jurisdiction to come in unless requested. And as for the reporter, no ethical and responsible journalist would give up the name of a confidential informant, even if it means going to jail for contempt.

kroxquo wrote: ↑

Fri Jun 24, 2022 5:25 am

flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑

Thu Jun 23, 2022 10:09 pm

The count here is 50 since the leak occurred. The ACLJ counts 63, including 3 today.

https://www.ncregister.com/news/as-atta ... onse-tepid

But have no fear, the FBI is 'investigating'.

As soon as they figure out who it was that leaked the draft decision, maybe they'll get to it.

Hint: Ask the Politico reporter who leaked it to them....

The FBI is not investigating the leak. Chief Justice Roberts has kept the investigation internal and since there was no crime committed they don't have jurisdiction to come in unless requested. And as for the reporter, no ethical and responsible journalist would give up the name of a confidential informant, even if it means going to jail for contempt.

Please find me an ethical and/or responsible journalist. That might be worth all this trouble.

No ethical or responsible journalist would have published this.

Well, we'll see what happens tonight.

I hope they listen to Biden, but there's rumblings that antifa is mobilizing a return in force.

I don't know. Nobody knows. But IF there's violence, the dems and media need to start doing some introspection.

But I fear that will only happen when hell freezes over.

flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑

Fri Jun 24, 2022 2:26 pm

Well, we'll see what happens tonight.

I hope they listen to Biden, but there's rumblings that antifa is mobilizing a return in force.

I don't know. Nobody knows. But IF there's violence, the dems and media need to start doing some introspection.

But I fear that will only happen when hell freezes over.

You're still suffering from the delusion that antifa is a real thing?

Bob Juch wrote: ↑

Fri Jun 24, 2022 3:46 pm

flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑

Fri Jun 24, 2022 2:26 pm

Well, we'll see what happens tonight.

I hope they listen to Biden, but there's rumblings that antifa is mobilizing a return in force.

I don't know. Nobody knows. But IF there's violence, the dems and media need to start doing some introspection.

But I fear that will only happen when hell freezes over.

You're still suffering from the delusion that antifa is a real thing?

I see you are still suffering from self imposed ignorance.

https://truthnewsnet.org/10104-2/

flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑

Fri Jun 24, 2022 6:14 pm

I see you are still suffering from self imposed ignorance.

https://truthnewsnet.org/10104-2/

The "fact" that nobody knows anything about who "antifa" is should be a big clue that there is no antifa. They don't have a website; they don't have a social media presence; they have no organizational structure. Unlike the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers and similar organizations who have very well organized command structures that enabled them to mobilize for January 6.

The far-more-likely explanation is that you have ad hoc groups and neighborhood activists organizing spur-of-the-moment protests in various communities. These groups come together quickly after an event like the Floyd killing and then drift apart almost as quickly because no one has the determination to turn them into a full-time movement. Contrast that to the Vietnam War era where you had very visible, very well organized groups like the Weather Underground and Black Panthers. Here, "antifa" doesn't even give themselves a name.

Yes, some of these protests do turn violent. There have been hundreds of arrests and numerous convictions stemming from riots and demonstrations after the Floyd killing. But in all that time, authorities haven't turned up any evidence of these supposed "antifa" groups. Antifa is just a name that right wingers slap on any local group that puts together a demonstration, especially one that turns violent. The goal is to get some sort of moral equivalence.

silverscreenselect wrote: ↑

Sat Jun 25, 2022 8:10 am

The "fact" that nobody knows anything about who "antifa" is should be a big clue that there is no antifa. They don't have a website; ...

Sure they do:

www.antifa.com


Here's a real one:

https://rosecityantifa.org/

Estonut wrote: ↑

Sat Jun 25, 2022 6:51 pm

silverscreenselect wrote: ↑

Sat Jun 25, 2022 8:10 am

The "fact" that nobody knows anything about who "antifa" is should be a big clue that there is no antifa. They don't have a website; ...

Sure they do:

www.antifa.com


Here's a real one:

https://rosecityantifa.org/

That's one small group in Portland that has Antifa in the name. It's not a nationwide organization the way the right portrays it.