2000 Mules
Posted: Sat May 07, 2022 10:02 pm
I know this will not do anything to influence or give any cause to think for any of our group of e-bigots on the bored. They will respond, however, and probably somewhat forcefully. They can go for it.
I also know the audience here is small, and no matter how passionate I am here, it will not make much of a difference.
I also know my reaction to this documentary is what you'd expect it to be.
I am writing this on the off chance that one of you people who really believe you have an open mind might be tempted to check into it yourself and maybe come to a conclusion that perhaps may change your perspective on many other things.
--------------------
I watched the 2000 Mules documentary along with a few other people tonite. Although I was aware of it's general content, having read a lot about the True the Vote research beforehand, it did surprise me in that it covered a lot of ground.
I watched it from the perspective of how, if someone like bob or my loyal stalker, or BJ were to watch it, what they would concentrate on. What questions would they ask? What would they point out as lies, falsehoods or misleading content? What would they say was left out?
Although I can't possibly recreate their worldview, which is alien to me, I tried the best I could to pick it apart. I did come up with holes, but as I watched further, they seemed to think their content through in the same way/ How would the left denigrate it and convince their 'subjects' to ignore it? And they answered most of the holes and possible inconsistencies I could come up with.
In brief, here's what they did.
https://rumble.com/v1238uc-2000-mules-trailer.html
True The Vote bought cell phone data in 5 of the most hotly contested states in the 2020 election and also for Georgia's 2021 Senate Runoff election (Arizona, Georgia, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Michigan). This is the same kind of cell phone data that major companies use to send you Walmart ads if your cell phone goes into a Walmart store. This was trillions of bits of data. This data tracks the movements of individual cell phones through space and time.
They narrowed the space in the 5 states to boundaries that included voter dropboxes and NGO's, which are nonprofit organizations that are connected to political activity.
To further limit it, they set parameters to find any cell phone during that time period that visited the area of 10 dropboxes AND 5 NGOs within a short period of time. Yeah, I saw where my Loyal Stalker says he went to his dropbox to vote. But did he go to nine other ones AND visit the offices of 5 NGOs? One question I had that was not answered in the movie was a list of the NGOs. I will do some further research and see if I can find the list, but I would think that list would be available, since, surely, an enterprising 'journalist' doing their best to refute this evidence would ask the same question.
They came up with about 2000 cellphones in those small areas in the 5 states that fit those parameters. Most of them exceeded the 10-5 rules by a lot.
Now in all those states, the practice of 'ballot harvesting' is illegal. One person can only legally deliver ballots for voting for ONLY their immediate family. In which case, they would only have to visit ONE drop box to cast those votes. These cell phones ALL visited 10 or more drop boxes.
To make sure they were tracking actual ballot harvesting, they also obtained 4 million minutes of actual video surveillance of these drop boxes, where it was available. Interestingly, video in both Arizona and Wisconsin, video surveillance was not available, though it was the law that there must be cameras recording them 24 hours a day. In Arizona, they just said they wouldn't give it to them, and in Wisconsin they just said they didn't do it for some reason. However, where it was available, they were able to view, through analysis of the location and times, hundreds of cases where it was pretty obvious something 'irregular' was going on.
To even further make sure of their parameters, remember I said they got the data from Georgia from Sept to Dec, when the Senate Runoff occurred. They looked at the data from the mules they identified for the General election. Most, if not all, of them DID NOT visit the requisite number of NGOs or ballot boxes UNTIL early voting for the runoff started. Then the same pattern started again.
I am not on twitter, so I can't break this down to individual videos. However, I urge you to look at all the clips of the interview. But the one I am referring to is the one about 13 clips down in black and white in Fulton Co Ga at 1 am. I believe, in the movie, they said this woman's cell phone was based in South Carolina, and they tracked this cell phone as a mule for both the Presidential Election and the Ga Runoff. It is at 1am, which is a suspicious time to cast ballots. She is wearing latex gloves to put the ballots in the box, but immediately removes them and throws them out. Give me an innocent explanation.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1513602928191414272
In conclusion, according to the just the data they found in these 5 small areas, they found EVIDENCE that 2000 mules, each casting 5 ballots each at the average number of ballot boxes the aggregate were tracked as visiting would result in 380,000 ILLEGALLY cast ballots. On a per state basis, just the illegally cast ballots would be enough to change the outcome in GA, AZ and PA, and would have given Trump the election.
There is already a 'fact checker' article out there by one of the usual suspects that has already been copied by the usual fake news outlets. My Loyal Stalker will, I'm sure, use this as his rebuttal, unless he reads down this far. But having seen the movie, I already have fact checks on the fact checker. They either accidentally, or more likely deliberately, left some facts out of their fact check. This is a long post, so he might get tired of reading, so he might miss it.
This is NOT PROOF.
However. True the Vote has this data, which could have and SHOULD have been also examined by the agencies that are responsible for making sure our elections are fair. Why weren't they? 2000 Mules answered this question as well. Now, since the data is there, my question is why can't we find some of the people attached to these cell phones and question them as to their whereabouts on the dates and times in question? They used data in exactly this way to find the killer of a young girl across the street of the Wendy's that was burned down in Atlanta. Why can't (won't) they do this here? That would provide the PROOF, if this extreme circumstantial evidence is not enough.
I also know the audience here is small, and no matter how passionate I am here, it will not make much of a difference.
I also know my reaction to this documentary is what you'd expect it to be.
I am writing this on the off chance that one of you people who really believe you have an open mind might be tempted to check into it yourself and maybe come to a conclusion that perhaps may change your perspective on many other things.
--------------------
I watched the 2000 Mules documentary along with a few other people tonite. Although I was aware of it's general content, having read a lot about the True the Vote research beforehand, it did surprise me in that it covered a lot of ground.
I watched it from the perspective of how, if someone like bob or my loyal stalker, or BJ were to watch it, what they would concentrate on. What questions would they ask? What would they point out as lies, falsehoods or misleading content? What would they say was left out?
Although I can't possibly recreate their worldview, which is alien to me, I tried the best I could to pick it apart. I did come up with holes, but as I watched further, they seemed to think their content through in the same way/ How would the left denigrate it and convince their 'subjects' to ignore it? And they answered most of the holes and possible inconsistencies I could come up with.
In brief, here's what they did.
https://rumble.com/v1238uc-2000-mules-trailer.html
True The Vote bought cell phone data in 5 of the most hotly contested states in the 2020 election and also for Georgia's 2021 Senate Runoff election (Arizona, Georgia, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Michigan). This is the same kind of cell phone data that major companies use to send you Walmart ads if your cell phone goes into a Walmart store. This was trillions of bits of data. This data tracks the movements of individual cell phones through space and time.
They narrowed the space in the 5 states to boundaries that included voter dropboxes and NGO's, which are nonprofit organizations that are connected to political activity.
To further limit it, they set parameters to find any cell phone during that time period that visited the area of 10 dropboxes AND 5 NGOs within a short period of time. Yeah, I saw where my Loyal Stalker says he went to his dropbox to vote. But did he go to nine other ones AND visit the offices of 5 NGOs? One question I had that was not answered in the movie was a list of the NGOs. I will do some further research and see if I can find the list, but I would think that list would be available, since, surely, an enterprising 'journalist' doing their best to refute this evidence would ask the same question.
They came up with about 2000 cellphones in those small areas in the 5 states that fit those parameters. Most of them exceeded the 10-5 rules by a lot.
Now in all those states, the practice of 'ballot harvesting' is illegal. One person can only legally deliver ballots for voting for ONLY their immediate family. In which case, they would only have to visit ONE drop box to cast those votes. These cell phones ALL visited 10 or more drop boxes.
To make sure they were tracking actual ballot harvesting, they also obtained 4 million minutes of actual video surveillance of these drop boxes, where it was available. Interestingly, video in both Arizona and Wisconsin, video surveillance was not available, though it was the law that there must be cameras recording them 24 hours a day. In Arizona, they just said they wouldn't give it to them, and in Wisconsin they just said they didn't do it for some reason. However, where it was available, they were able to view, through analysis of the location and times, hundreds of cases where it was pretty obvious something 'irregular' was going on.
To even further make sure of their parameters, remember I said they got the data from Georgia from Sept to Dec, when the Senate Runoff occurred. They looked at the data from the mules they identified for the General election. Most, if not all, of them DID NOT visit the requisite number of NGOs or ballot boxes UNTIL early voting for the runoff started. Then the same pattern started again.
I am not on twitter, so I can't break this down to individual videos. However, I urge you to look at all the clips of the interview. But the one I am referring to is the one about 13 clips down in black and white in Fulton Co Ga at 1 am. I believe, in the movie, they said this woman's cell phone was based in South Carolina, and they tracked this cell phone as a mule for both the Presidential Election and the Ga Runoff. It is at 1am, which is a suspicious time to cast ballots. She is wearing latex gloves to put the ballots in the box, but immediately removes them and throws them out. Give me an innocent explanation.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1513602928191414272
In conclusion, according to the just the data they found in these 5 small areas, they found EVIDENCE that 2000 mules, each casting 5 ballots each at the average number of ballot boxes the aggregate were tracked as visiting would result in 380,000 ILLEGALLY cast ballots. On a per state basis, just the illegally cast ballots would be enough to change the outcome in GA, AZ and PA, and would have given Trump the election.
There is already a 'fact checker' article out there by one of the usual suspects that has already been copied by the usual fake news outlets. My Loyal Stalker will, I'm sure, use this as his rebuttal, unless he reads down this far. But having seen the movie, I already have fact checks on the fact checker. They either accidentally, or more likely deliberately, left some facts out of their fact check. This is a long post, so he might get tired of reading, so he might miss it.
This is NOT PROOF.
However. True the Vote has this data, which could have and SHOULD have been also examined by the agencies that are responsible for making sure our elections are fair. Why weren't they? 2000 Mules answered this question as well. Now, since the data is there, my question is why can't we find some of the people attached to these cell phones and question them as to their whereabouts on the dates and times in question? They used data in exactly this way to find the killer of a young girl across the street of the Wendy's that was burned down in Atlanta. Why can't (won't) they do this here? That would provide the PROOF, if this extreme circumstantial evidence is not enough.