Page 5 of 5

Re: Roe v Wade overturned?

Posted: Mon May 09, 2022 7:56 pm
by SportsFan68
Beebs52 wrote:
Mon May 09, 2022 7:37 pm
SportsFan68 wrote:
Mon May 09, 2022 7:16 pm
Beebs52 wrote:
Wed May 04, 2022 7:54 pm


You're right. This is the disagreement. Whole key to it all. And, he who prevails wins. He, in the old timey way of use, not binary, cis, bullshit way, of statement. You're an atheist. I am not. Babe is a being. C'est la vie. For real. Deal.

Plus there's that last trimester abortion thing that, oh, Colorado, just voted in. Hmmm
No, this Colorado law does not allow abortions ‘up until the moment of birth’ Here's the URL:

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2 ... until-mom/
Colorado’s law protects the right to have an abortion and does not make distinctions or regulations around a time or stage during pregnancy.

I'm confused. Does that not say what I stated?
No.

Re: Roe v Wade overturned?

Posted: Mon May 09, 2022 11:07 pm
by Bob Juch
Bob78164 wrote:
Mon May 09, 2022 7:39 pm
Beebs52 wrote:
Mon May 09, 2022 6:54 pm
Bob78164 wrote:
Mon May 09, 2022 6:19 pm
There are bills pending right now that would ban IUDs because they prevent implantation of the fertilized egg. I'm not the crazy one -- that would be the Republican legislators who will be unleashed when Roe is reversed -- and denial ain't just a river in Egypt. --Bob
Where?
This one in Louisiana, for one, which has cleared its committee on a 7-2 vote. Any other bill that gives a fertilized egg all of the civil rights of a human being would have the same effect, as well as barring in vitro fertilization (because many fertilized eggs are discarded in the process). --Bob
Does that give a tax exemption and public assistance to fetuses?

Re: Roe v Wade overturned?

Posted: Tue May 10, 2022 9:34 am
by jarnon
flockofseagulls104 wrote:
Fri May 06, 2022 11:17 am
Here we go!

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/why-a ... ar-AAWZU9y

I'm sure that this will persuade a lot of people to change their minds on this issue.

Here is their website.

I have found their website. I may just infiltrate.
Not just a threat:
Wisconsin anti-abortion office fire investigation ongoing

The government is taking this danger seriously.

Image

Senate passes bill to give police protection to families of Supreme Court justices

Ironically, among those who would be eligible for protection is Ginni Thomas, who has supported right-wing extremist groups.

Re: Roe v Wade overturned?

Posted: Tue May 10, 2022 10:58 am
by flockofseagulls104
jarnon wrote:
Tue May 10, 2022 9:34 am
flockofseagulls104 wrote:
Fri May 06, 2022 11:17 am
Here we go!

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/why-a ... ar-AAWZU9y

I'm sure that this will persuade a lot of people to change their minds on this issue.

Here is their website.

I have found their website. I may just infiltrate.
Not just a threat:
Wisconsin anti-abortion office fire investigation ongoing

The government is taking this danger seriously.

Image

Senate passes bill to give police protection to families of Supreme Court justices

Ironically, among those who would be eligible for protection is Ginni Thomas, who has supported right-wing extremist groups.
Yes. Mob rule is alright if it supports the left wing narrative. Just like it was in the 2020 mob riots when covid wasn't a factor. No one in the White House is condemning the intimidation of judges, and the MSM is encouraging it.

We might as well do away with our system of justice and just decide these things on social media.

https://realnewsaggregator.com/news/202 ... platforms/
Ironically, among those who would be eligible for protection is Ginni Thomas, who has supported right-wing extremist groups.
That is bullshit. But when you control the media and can write anything you want, you can label Project Veritas a right wing extremist group and have people post sentences like that without any thought.

Re: Roe v Wade overturned?

Posted: Tue May 10, 2022 5:23 pm
by BackInTex
jarnon wrote:
Tue May 10, 2022 9:34 am
Ironically, among those who would be eligible for protection is Ginni Thomas, who has supported right-wing extremist groups.
Name two. I'm interested.

Re: Roe v Wade overturned?

Posted: Tue May 10, 2022 6:00 pm
by Beebs52
BackInTex wrote:
Tue May 10, 2022 5:23 pm
jarnon wrote:
Tue May 10, 2022 9:34 am
Ironically, among those who would be eligible for protection is Ginni Thomas, who has supported right-wing extremist groups.
Name two. I'm interested.
Ironically, define right wing and left wing. And, ironically, are there any "left wing" groups that other justices or their spouses support?

Just ironically speaking.

Re: Roe v Wade overturned?

Posted: Tue May 10, 2022 6:04 pm
by flockofseagulls104
Beebs52 wrote:
Tue May 10, 2022 6:00 pm
BackInTex wrote:
Tue May 10, 2022 5:23 pm
jarnon wrote:
Tue May 10, 2022 9:34 am
Ironically, among those who would be eligible for protection is Ginni Thomas, who has supported right-wing extremist groups.
Name two. I'm interested.
Ironically, define right wing and left wing. And, ironically, are there any "left wing" groups that other justices or their spouses support?

Just ironically speaking.
Don't read too much into it. Just a random, driveby slander of somebody who, I guess, has become a designated target du jour.

Re: Roe v Wade overturned?

Posted: Tue May 10, 2022 6:17 pm
by jarnon
BackInTex wrote:
Tue May 10, 2022 5:23 pm
jarnon wrote:
Tue May 10, 2022 9:34 am
Ironically, among those who would be eligible for protection is Ginni Thomas, who has supported right-wing extremist groups.
Name two. I'm interested.
Here's an article describing Mrs. Thomas's long history of activism:
Is Ginni Thomas a Threat to the Supreme Court?

I don't know enough about these various groups to opine on which ones are "extremist," though C.N.P. Action and Groundswell seem to be out there. OTOH, I don't think Black Lives Matter and Critical Resistance (prison abolition) are extremist, but you may. My point is that it's ironic that Thomas is being protected from activists who are the mirror image of ones that she has long supported.

And I posted two articles and a stunning photo critical of left-wing extremism so don't pick on me.

Re: Roe v Wade overturned?

Posted: Tue May 10, 2022 6:25 pm
by Beebs52
jarnon wrote:
Tue May 10, 2022 6:17 pm
BackInTex wrote:
Tue May 10, 2022 5:23 pm
jarnon wrote:
Tue May 10, 2022 9:34 am
Ironically, among those who would be eligible for protection is Ginni Thomas, who has supported right-wing extremist groups.
Name two. I'm interested.
Here's an article describing Mrs. Thomas's long history of activism:
Is Ginni Thomas a Threat to the Supreme Court?

I don't know enough about these various groups to opine on which ones are "extremist," though C.N.P. Action and Groundswell seem to be out there. OTOH, I don't think Black Lives Matter and Critical Resistance (prison abolition) are extremist, but you may. My point is that it's ironic that Thomas is being protected from activists who are the mirror image of ones that she has long supported.

And I posted two articles and a stunning photo critical of left-wing extremism so don't pick on me.
BLM movement or BLM organization? Big diff. And why is it ironic for anyone to be protected from any idiot activist? Has she supported violence or something?

Re: Roe v Wade overturned?

Posted: Tue May 10, 2022 6:41 pm
by flockofseagulls104
quote]I don't know enough about these various groups to opine on which ones are "extremist," [/quote]

So why did you go through the trouble of adding it to your post if you didn't know?
Seemed like an odd non-sequitor.
Not picking on you, but you ought to be more careful quoting crap like that.
Do your own research. Don't go quoting stuff just because it's in some magazine or on the internet. (Like my stalker does).
Anybody who thinks Turning Point USA or Project Veritas are 'extreme Right Wing Groups' is pretty much completely indoctinated, and to use that to slander a Justice's wife is disgusting.
But that is just an example of what passes for 'journalism' these days.

Re: Roe v Wade overturned?

Posted: Tue May 10, 2022 7:02 pm
by Beebs52
jarnon wrote:
Tue May 10, 2022 6:17 pm
BackInTex wrote:
Tue May 10, 2022 5:23 pm
jarnon wrote:
Tue May 10, 2022 9:34 am
Ironically, among those who would be eligible for protection is Ginni Thomas, who has supported right-wing extremist groups.
Name two. I'm interested.
Here's an article describing Mrs. Thomas's long history of activism:
Is Ginni Thomas a Threat to the Supreme Court?

I don't know enough about these various groups to opine on which ones are "extremist," though C.N.P. Action and Groundswell seem to be out there. OTOH, I don't think Black Lives Matter and Critical Resistance (prison abolition) are extremist, but you may. My point is that it's ironic that Thomas is being protected from activists who are the mirror image of ones that she has long supported.

And I posted two articles and a stunning photo critical of left-wing extremism so don't pick on me.
Are you kidding? Angela Davis et al? How old are you?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prison_ ... n_movement

Re: Roe v Wade overturned?

Posted: Tue May 10, 2022 7:13 pm
by Beebs52
It's okay. We're doomed to repeat the past if we don't study history. All good.

Re: Roe v Wade overturned?

Posted: Tue May 10, 2022 7:16 pm
by flockofseagulls104
Beebs52 wrote:
Tue May 10, 2022 6:25 pm
jarnon wrote:
Tue May 10, 2022 6:17 pm
BackInTex wrote:
Tue May 10, 2022 5:23 pm
Name two. I'm interested.
Here's an article describing Mrs. Thomas's long history of activism:
Is Ginni Thomas a Threat to the Supreme Court?

I don't know enough about these various groups to opine on which ones are "extremist," though C.N.P. Action and Groundswell seem to be out there. OTOH, I don't think Black Lives Matter and Critical Resistance (prison abolition) are extremist, but you may. My point is that it's ironic that Thomas is being protected from activists who are the mirror image of ones that she has long supported.

And I posted two articles and a stunning photo critical of left-wing extremism so don't pick on me.
BLM movement or BLM organization? Big diff. And why is it ironic for anyone to be protected from any idiot activist? Has she supported violence or something?
Yeah, Charlie Kirk and James O'Keefe are always out there every day shooting people and burning things down.
How have we come to the place where someone like jarnon seemingly innocently can write things like this and attach his name to it so nonchalantly?

Re: Roe v Wade overturned?

Posted: Tue May 10, 2022 7:34 pm
by Beebs52
jarnon wrote:
Tue May 10, 2022 6:17 pm
BackInTex wrote:
Tue May 10, 2022 5:23 pm
jarnon wrote:
Tue May 10, 2022 9:34 am
Ironically, among those who would be eligible for protection is Ginni Thomas, who has supported right-wing extremist groups.
Name two. I'm interested.
Here's an article describing Mrs. Thomas's long history of activism:
Is Ginni Thomas a Threat to the Supreme Court?

I don't know enough about these various groups to opine on which ones are "extremist," though C.N.P. Action and Groundswell seem to be out there. OTOH, I don't think Black Lives Matter and Critical Resistance (prison abolition) are extremist, but you may. My point is that it's ironic that Thomas is being protected from activists who are the mirror image of ones that she has long supported.

And I posted two articles and a stunning photo critical of left-wing extremism so don't pick on me.
Here's some more history for you.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Ayers

Re: Roe v Wade overturned?

Posted: Tue May 10, 2022 8:07 pm
by flockofseagulls104
History? Who needs that?
Most people nowadays believe the world only started when they became conscious.
If they ever did.

Re: Roe v Wade overturned?

Posted: Thu May 12, 2022 8:46 am
by Bob Juch
Image

Re: Roe v Wade overturned?

Posted: Thu May 12, 2022 10:07 am
by flockofseagulls104
Nice picture.

Re: Roe v Wade overturned?

Posted: Thu May 12, 2022 10:28 am
by BackInTex
flockofseagulls104 wrote:
Thu May 12, 2022 10:07 am
Nice picture.
Ignorance can be quite the artistic influence.

Re: Roe v Wade overturned?

Posted: Thu May 12, 2022 10:58 am
by Bob Juch
BackInTex wrote:
Thu May 12, 2022 10:28 am
flockofseagulls104 wrote:
Thu May 12, 2022 10:07 am
Nice picture.
Ignorance can be quite the artistic influence.
Illustrating ignorance often is.

Re: Roe v Wade overturned?

Posted: Thu May 12, 2022 11:15 am
by flockofseagulls104
Bob Juch wrote:
Thu May 12, 2022 10:58 am
BackInTex wrote:
Thu May 12, 2022 10:28 am
flockofseagulls104 wrote:
Thu May 12, 2022 10:07 am
Nice picture.
Ignorance can be quite the artistic influence.
Illustrating ignorance often is.
Hey BiT, Give me a call. I need some help in poisoning some air and fouling some water.

Re: Roe v Wade overturned?

Posted: Thu May 12, 2022 11:20 am
by wbtravis007
flockofseagulls104 wrote:
Thu May 12, 2022 11:15 am
Bob Juch wrote:
Thu May 12, 2022 10:58 am
BackInTex wrote:
Thu May 12, 2022 10:28 am


Ignorance can be quite the artistic influence.
Illustrating ignorance often is.
Hey BiT, Give me a call. I need some help in poisoning some air and fouling some water.
Hey, BJ. Give me a call, Comrade. I want to talk about how you and I, and Warren Buffett and them, hate America and love communism.

Re: Roe v Wade overturned?

Posted: Thu May 12, 2022 8:16 pm
by flockofseagulls104
wbtravis007 wrote:
Thu May 12, 2022 11:20 am
flockofseagulls104 wrote:
Thu May 12, 2022 11:15 am
Bob Juch wrote:
Thu May 12, 2022 10:58 am


Illustrating ignorance often is.
Hey BiT, Give me a call. I need some help in poisoning some air and fouling some water.
Hey, BJ. Give me a call, Comrade. I want to talk about how you and I, and Warren Buffett and them, hate America and love communism.
He ain't good with talkin. He finds some interesting pictures sometimes, tho.