Page 1 of 1
It Is Probably Nothing #2
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2022 4:02 pm
by Spock
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... riods.html
EU watchdog to probe links between Covid vaccines and irregular periods.
Would have been nice if they had investigated this prior to jabbing a billion people.
I do love this bullet point.
>>>"No evidence vaccines affect fertility and most reported changes are short-lived"<<<
Might be a little early to know if they affect fertility given the short time they have been used.
Re: It Is Probably Nothing #2
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2022 4:32 pm
by silverscreenselect
Quick rule of thumb: any news source that uses the terms "jabbed" or "double-jabbed" instead of vaccinated is not likely to be impartial.
Just a quick google search reveals that this isn't news and that there have already been extensive studies. One article I read indicated that the effect was more closely akin to a sore arm than a serious adverse event.
Again, this is a risk-benefit analysis. Every treatment has possible side effects that don't manifest themselves for a long time. If we applied your logic, we wouldn't be taking aspirin.
On the other hand:
“There is evidence to suggest that infection with SARS-CoV-2 has the potential to impact both male fertility, female fertility, and certainly the health of a pregnancy of someone infected,” said Dr. Jennifer Kawwass, a reproductive endocrinologist and associate professor at the Emory University School of Medicine in Atlanta.
https://www.nbcnews.com/health/sexual-h ... t-rcna2868
There are a lot more articles like this one.
Re: It Is Probably Nothing #2
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2022 4:44 pm
by Bob78164
Spock wrote: ↑Mon Feb 21, 2022 4:02 pm
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... riods.html
EU watchdog to probe links between Covid vaccines and irregular periods.
Would have been nice if they had investigated this prior to jabbing a billion people.
I do love this bullet point.
>>>"No evidence vaccines affect fertility and most reported changes are short-lived"<<<
Might be a little early to know if they affect fertility given the short time they have been used.
"So far studies have either pointed to small and short-lived period disruption post-vaccination, or not found a link at all."
So they should have waited before administering a preventative measure that has clearly saved hundreds of thousands of lives (and remember, the disease itself also can cause disruption of periods) because a few tens of thousands of women may have had small and short-lived disruption of their periods that had no effect on fertility? That's like saying you shouldn't shelter cattle from a deadly winter blizzard because keeping them in the barn might throw off their sleep schedules for a day or two. --Bob
Re: It Is Probably Nothing #2
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2022 5:23 pm
by Beebs52
Bob78164 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 21, 2022 4:44 pm
Spock wrote: ↑Mon Feb 21, 2022 4:02 pm
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... riods.html
EU watchdog to probe links between Covid vaccines and irregular periods.
Would have been nice if they had investigated this prior to jabbing a billion people.
I do love this bullet point.
>>>"No evidence vaccines affect fertility and most reported changes are short-lived"<<<
Might be a little early to know if they affect fertility given the short time they have been used.
"So far studies have either pointed to small and short-lived period disruption post-vaccination, or not found a link at all."
So they should have waited before administering a preventative measure that has clearly saved hundreds of thousands of lives (and remember, the disease itself also can cause disruption of periods) because a few tens of thousands of women may have had small and short-lived disruption of their periods that had no effect on fertility? That's like saying you shouldn't shelter cattle from a deadly winter blizzard because keeping them in the barn might through off their sleep schedules for a day or two. --Bob
I am not commenting on the truth or not of this article.
I am commenting on the amusing comparison of periods et al to cattle shelter. That is telling.
Re: It Is Probably Nothing #2
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2022 5:40 pm
by Estonut
silverscreenselect wrote: ↑Mon Feb 21, 2022 4:32 pm
Quick rule of thumb: any news source that uses the terms "jabbed" or "double-jabbed" instead of vaccinated is not likely to be impartial.
It's rare, but you got something right:
CNN
ABC
Re: It Is Probably Nothing #2
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2022 5:51 pm
by Bob78164
Beebs52 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 21, 2022 5:23 pm
Bob78164 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 21, 2022 4:44 pm
Spock wrote: ↑Mon Feb 21, 2022 4:02 pm
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... riods.html
EU watchdog to probe links between Covid vaccines and irregular periods.
Would have been nice if they had investigated this prior to jabbing a billion people.
I do love this bullet point.
>>>"No evidence vaccines affect fertility and most reported changes are short-lived"<<<
Might be a little early to know if they affect fertility given the short time they have been used.
"So far studies have either pointed to small and short-lived period disruption post-vaccination, or not found a link at all."
So they should have waited before administering a preventative measure that has clearly saved hundreds of thousands of lives (and remember, the disease itself also can cause disruption of periods) because a few tens of thousands of women may have had small and short-lived disruption of their periods that had no effect on fertility? That's like saying you shouldn't shelter cattle from a deadly winter blizzard because keeping them in the barn might through off their sleep schedules for a day or two. --Bob
I am not commenting on the truth or not of this article.
I am commenting on the amusing comparison of periods et al to cattle shelter. That is telling.
I thought I'd try a risk-management example that Spock might have some familiarity with. Because if he's seriously contending that what was reported was remotely close to a reason to hold up approval or use of the vaccines, he's clearly got some serious problems understanding risk evaluation. --Bob
Re: It Is Probably Nothing #2
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2022 5:53 pm
by Beebs52
Bob78164 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 21, 2022 5:51 pm
Beebs52 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 21, 2022 5:23 pm
Bob78164 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 21, 2022 4:44 pm
"So far studies have either pointed to small and short-lived period disruption post-vaccination, or not found a link at all."
So they should have waited before administering a preventative measure that has clearly saved hundreds of thousands of lives (and remember, the disease itself also can cause disruption of periods) because a few tens of thousands of women may have had small and short-lived disruption of their periods that had no effect on fertility? That's like saying you shouldn't shelter cattle from a deadly winter blizzard because keeping them in the barn might through off their sleep schedules for a day or two. --Bob
I am not commenting on the truth or not of this article.
I am commenting on the amusing comparison of periods et al to cattle shelter. That is telling.
I thought I'd try a risk-management example that Spock might have some familiarity with. Because if he's seriously contending that what was reported was remotely close to a reason to hold up approval or use of the vaccines, he's clearly got some serious problems understanding risk evaluation. --Bob
Okay
Re: It Is Probably Nothing #2
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2022 6:35 pm
by Weyoun
So basically they found a mild side effect which resolved without any long-term morbidity, and you’re some middle-aged white guy who won’t get the Covid vaccine for that reason.
Well thought out, as always, by you.
Re: It Is Probably Nothing #2
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2022 6:38 pm
by Beebs52
Weyoun wrote: ↑Mon Feb 21, 2022 6:35 pm
So basically they found a mild side effect which resolved without any long-term morbidity, and you’re some middle-aged white guy who won’t get the Covid vaccine for that reason.
Well thought out, as always, by you.
This is not even my argument here, but whoa, you are sorta well,...
Re: It Is Probably Nothing #2
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2022 6:41 pm
by Beebs52
And...the only reason you're responding is because you're pissed or just want to irritate. Just like MANY of us do in silly threads. Too easy.
Re: It Is Probably Nothing #2
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2022 7:57 pm
by tlynn78
Beebs52 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 21, 2022 6:38 pm
Weyoun wrote: ↑Mon Feb 21, 2022 6:35 pm
So basically they found a mild side effect which resolved without any long-term morbidity, and you’re some middle-aged white guy who won’t get the Covid vaccine for that reason.
Well thought out, as always, by you.
This is not even my argument here, but whoa, you are sorta well,...
at least.
Re: It Is Probably Nothing #2
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2022 8:35 pm
by flockofseagulls104
Weyoun wrote: ↑Mon Feb 21, 2022 6:35 pm
So basically they found a mild side effect which resolved without any long-term morbidity, and you’re some middle-aged white guy who won’t get the Covid vaccine for that reason.
Well thought out, as always, by you.
Another well-thought-out and well-presented medical opinion. Probably peer-reviewed, too. Imagonna go out and get a couple more vaccine shots! Well done, doctor!
----- added after the fact.
Going back to see.
Most posts I make, guess who is RIGHT AFTER ME?
Here's one. STALKER!!!
Re: It Is Probably Nothing #2
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2022 9:01 pm
by silverscreenselect
flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 21, 2022 8:35 pm
Weyoun wrote: ↑Mon Feb 21, 2022 6:35 pm
So basically they found a mild side effect which resolved without any long-term morbidity, and you’re some middle-aged white guy who won’t get the Covid vaccine for that reason.
Well thought out, as always, by you.
Another well-thought-out and well-presented medical opinion. Probably peer-reviewed, too. Imagonna go out and get a couple more vaccine shots! Well done, doctor!
Once again, Flock has no answer so he resorts to bad sarcasm.
Re: It Is Probably Nothing #2
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2022 9:08 pm
by Beebs52
silverscreenselect wrote: ↑Mon Feb 21, 2022 9:01 pm
flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 21, 2022 8:35 pm
Weyoun wrote: ↑Mon Feb 21, 2022 6:35 pm
So basically they found a mild side effect which resolved without any long-term morbidity, and you’re some middle-aged white guy who won’t get the Covid vaccine for that reason.
Well thought out, as always, by you.
Another well-thought-out and well-presented medical opinion. Probably peer-reviewed, too. Imagonna go out and get a couple more vaccine shots! Well done, doctor!
Once again, Flock has no answer so he resorts to bad sarcasm.
Well, Weyoun has ragged on people, too.
Re: It Is Probably Nothing #2
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2022 9:36 pm
by flockofseagulls104
Beebs52 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 21, 2022 9:08 pm
silverscreenselect wrote: ↑Mon Feb 21, 2022 9:01 pm
flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 21, 2022 8:35 pm
Another well-thought-out and well-presented medical opinion. Probably peer-reviewed, too. Imagonna go out and get a couple more vaccine shots! Well done, doctor!
Once again, Flock has no answer so he resorts to bad sarcasm.
Well, Weyoun has ragged on people, too.
Well, I get to see another one of his pokes at me. I thought that was above average sarcasm myself. He ain't going to change that's for sure. He's got an obsession.
Re: It Is Probably Nothing #2
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2022 9:40 pm
by flockofseagulls104
I wonder if there's a single post that I have ever made that SSS hasn't stalked me on.
--------- Added afterward
Not all, but the majority of them. Lookee who made the post right after me and trashed me!
GUESS WHO? SilverScreenStalker
Re: It Is Probably Nothing #2
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2022 10:42 pm
by silverscreenselect
flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 21, 2022 9:40 pm
I wonder if there's a single post that I have ever made that SSS hasn't stalked me on.
If you quit making moronic, illogical, non-factual posts, I won't stalk you on them.
I will give you some advice though. Don't try your luck at stand-up comedy. The hecklers will be far more brutal on you than I've ever been.
Re: It Is Probably Nothing #2
Posted: Tue Feb 22, 2022 10:15 am
by tlynn78
flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 21, 2022 9:40 pm
I wonder if there's a single post that I have ever made that SSS hasn't stalked me on.
Your own personal fanboi. Be thankful you don't live near him.
Re: It Is Probably Nothing #2
Posted: Tue Feb 22, 2022 10:25 am
by flockofseagulls104
tlynn78 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 10:15 am
flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 21, 2022 9:40 pm
I wonder if there's a single post that I have ever made that SSS hasn't stalked me on.
Your own personal fanboi. Be thankful you don't live near him.
Oh, but I do. But I have a good security system.
Re: It Is Probably Nothing #2
Posted: Tue Feb 22, 2022 9:52 pm
by wbtravis007
flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 21, 2022 9:36 pm
Beebs52 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 21, 2022 9:08 pm
silverscreenselect wrote: ↑Mon Feb 21, 2022 9:01 pm
Once again, Flock has no answer so he resorts to bad sarcasm.
Well, Weyoun has ragged on people, too.
Well, I get to see another one of his pokes at me. I thought that was above average sarcasm myself. He ain't going to change that's for sure. He's got an obsession.
Man, talk about projection.
I’m not worthy of channeling one of our long-gone posters who is on my Mount Rushmore of them, but I just can’t help myself:
Seek help now.
Re: It Is Probably Nothing #2
Posted: Tue Feb 22, 2022 10:09 pm
by flockofseagulls104
wbtravis007 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 9:52 pm
flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 21, 2022 9:36 pm
Beebs52 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 21, 2022 9:08 pm
Well, Weyoun has ragged on people, too.
Well, I get to see another one of his pokes at me. I thought that was above average sarcasm myself. He ain't going to change that's for sure. He's got an obsession.
Man, talk about projection.
I’m not worthy of channeling one of our long-gone posters who is on my Mount Rushmore of them, but I just can’t help myself:
Seek help now.
Oh, hi there, original stalker! Have the duties been handed off to you, or are you freelancing again?
