Apology from a two-time voter for Donny

[Bob78164]

Tgirl? What about you? Still wondering what I missed.

Crickets.

Well, I guess that's kind of interesting.

Here's an old thing. https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2016/11 ... sults.html

Plus, if you go back to Bob# not my president exhortations, plus the 4 year attempts to oust him...
Gosh, I dunno.

I stand by both impeachment efforts. But I never denied that Donny had, and was entitled to exercise, the formal powers of the Oval Office. I just reviled and protested against the manner in which he exercised those powers, and denied his MORAL right to the courtesies and respect ordinarily accorded the President of the United States.

Nor did I ever deny that Donny won the election in 2016, much less suggest violent insurrection. --Bob

[Beebs52]

Crickets.

Well, I guess that's kind of interesting.

Here's an old thing. https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2016/11 ... sults.html

Plus, if you go back to Bob# not my president exhortations, plus the 4 year attempts to oust him...
Gosh, I dunno.

I stand by both impeachment efforts. But I never denied that Donny had, and was entitled to exercise, the formal powers of the Oval Office. I just reviled and protested against the manner in which he exercised those powers, and denied his MORAL right to the courtesies and respect ordinarily accorded the President of the United States.

Nor did I ever deny that Donny won the election in 2016, much less suggest violent insurrection. --Bob

Waffle house

[wbtravis007]

Tgirl? What about you? Still wondering what I missed.

Crickets.

Well, I guess that's kind of interesting.

Here's an old thing. https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2016/11 ... sults.html

Plus, if you go back to Bob# not my president exhortations, plus the 4 year attempts to oust him...
Gosh, I dunno.

Three guys urged ... and oh, yeah, Bob many numbers!

What were the 4 year attempts to oust him? One impeachment 3 years in. And Romney was right to vote to convict, although no one seriously thought that others would.

[Beebs52]

Crickets.

Well, I guess that's kind of interesting.

Here's an old thing. https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2016/11 ... sults.html

Plus, if you go back to Bob# not my president exhortations, plus the 4 year attempts to oust him...
Gosh, I dunno.

Three guys urged ... and oh, yeah, Bob many numbers!

What were the 4 year attempts to oust him? One impeachment 3 years in. And Romney was right to vote to convict, although no one seriously thought that others would.

Of course no one else disputed results. Erasure is a convenient mood enhancer.

I realize you want to gin up old rehashed shit. Old news. No one cares.

[BackInTex]

What were the 4 year attempts to oust him? One impeachment 3 years in.

Senility is a bitch, I bet. Sorry for ya.

Mueller ring a bell?

[wbtravis007]

What were the 4 year attempts to oust him? One impeachment 3 years in.

Senility is a bitch, I bet. Sorry for ya.

Mueller ring a bell?

The life-long republican appointed by Trump’s attorney general? Sure. I remember him.

[Beebs52]

What were the 4 year attempts to oust him? One impeachment 3 years in.

Senility is a bitch, I bet. Sorry for ya.

Mueller ring a bell?

The life-long republican appointed by Trump’s attorney general? Sure. I remember him.

You funny.

[wbtravis007]

Here's an old thing. https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2016/11 ... sults.html

Plus, if you go back to Bob# not my president exhortations, plus the 4 year attempts to oust him...
Gosh, I dunno.

Three guys urged ... and oh, yeah, Bob many numbers!

What were the 4 year attempts to oust him? One impeachment 3 years in. And Romney was right to vote to convict, although no one seriously thought that others would.

Of course no one else disputed results. Erasure is a convenient mood enhancer.

I realize you want to gin up old rehashed shit. Old news. No one cares.

No. Not trying to rehash. Just still wondering what the hell y’all keep referring to. Still waiting to hear. Something real.

[Beebs52]

Three guys urged ... and oh, yeah, Bob many numbers!

What were the 4 year attempts to oust him? One impeachment 3 years in. And Romney was right to vote to convict, although no one seriously thought that others would.

Of course no one else disputed results. Erasure is a convenient mood enhancer.

I realize you want to gin up old rehashed shit. Old news. No one cares.

No. Not trying to rehash. Just still wondering what the hell y’all keep referring to. Still waiting to hear. Something real.

Apparently you've been busy the last few years. Most are having to get over the random bullshit. It's fucking 2021. Your candidate won. Let's get on with it.

[silverscreenselect]

It's fucking 2021. Your candidate won. Let's get on with it.

The people who aren't willing to "get on with it" are the Trump supporters who stormed the Capitol and keep insisting that there was fraud in the election. One of them even wrote a lengthy farewell address to this Bored to that effect. All the while they are trying to purge their members who aren't sufficiently loyal and spouting theories about Jewish space lasers causing the California wildfires.

Democrats are moving on. They are addressing the coronavirus. They are trying to get the economy back on its feet. It's the Republicans who seem locked in the past.

[wbtravis007]

Of course no one else disputed results. Erasure is a convenient mood enhancer.

I realize you want to gin up old rehashed shit. Old news. No one cares.

No. Not trying to rehash. Just still wondering what the hell y’all keep referring to. Still waiting to hear. Something real.

Apparently you've been busy the last few years. Most are having to get over the random bullshit. It's fucking 2021. Your candidate won. Let's get on with it.

You’re the one who brought it up, Dear. And since it wasn’t the first time I thought I’d just see if you would splain what you’re trying to say.

You still haven’t. That’s fine. No big deal to me at all.

[Beebs52]

It's fucking 2021. Your candidate won. Let's get on with it.

The people who aren't willing to "get on with it" are the Trump supporters who stormed the Capitol and keep insisting that there was fraud in the election. One of them even wrote a lengthy farewell address to this Bored to that effect. All the while they are trying to purge their members who aren't sufficiently loyal and spouting theories about Jewish space lasers causing the California wildfires.

Democrats are moving on. They are addressing the coronavirus. They are trying to get the economy back on its feet. It's the Republicans who seem locked in the past.

You're accusing most Repubs of that? And not your fave media of pushing all sorts of that crap?

[Bob78164]

It's fucking 2021. Your candidate won. Let's get on with it.

The people who aren't willing to "get on with it" are the Trump supporters who stormed the Capitol and keep insisting that there was fraud in the election. One of them even wrote a lengthy farewell address to this Bored to that effect. All the while they are trying to purge their members who aren't sufficiently loyal and spouting theories about Jewish space lasers causing the California wildfires.

Democrats are moving on. They are addressing the coronavirus. They are trying to get the economy back on its feet. It's the Republicans who seem locked in the past.

You're accusing most Repubs of that? And not your fave media of pushing all sorts of that crap?

So far, the only people to be censured by any entity in connection with the January 6 insurrection are Republicans who voted to impeach Donny. And the Arizona State Republican Party censured Republican Governor Doug Ducey for refusing to overturn the election.

Yes, it's the organized Republican Party that has gone all-in on overturning the will of the people. So no, we will not simply allow this to fade quietly into the night. Not until the Republican Party comes to grips with what it's become.

You yourself seem to be saying that if the Republicans do nominate Donny again in 2024, you'll vote for him again. That's part of the problem. Until the Republican Party (and that means its voters) forcefully repudiates the lies, it doesn't deserve to hold, and can't be trusted with, political power. --Bob

[Beebs52]

The people who aren't willing to "get on with it" are the Trump supporters who stormed the Capitol and keep insisting that there was fraud in the election. One of them even wrote a lengthy farewell address to this Bored to that effect. All the while they are trying to purge their members who aren't sufficiently loyal and spouting theories about Jewish space lasers causing the California wildfires.

Democrats are moving on. They are addressing the coronavirus. They are trying to get the economy back on its feet. It's the Republicans who seem locked in the past.

You're accusing most Repubs of that? And not your fave media of pushing all sorts of that crap?

So far, the only people to be censured by any entity in connection with the January 6 insurrection are Republicans who voted to impeach Donny. And the Arizona State Republican Party censured Republican Governor Doug Ducey for refusing to overturn the election.

Yes, it's the organized Republican Party that has gone all-in on overturning the will of the people. So no, we will not simply allow this to fade quietly into the night. Not until the Republican Party comes to grips with what it's become.

You yourself seem to be saying that if the Republicans do nominate Donny again in 2024, you'll vote for him again. That's part of the problem. Until the Republican Party (and that means its voters) forcefully repudiates the lies, it doesn't deserve to hold, and can't be trusted with, political power. --Bob

So we will not let this...blah. Joke
I have specifically said I would not vote for him again. You do not read or pay attention.
You just want a narrative cause you're incapable of getting on with it.

[silverscreenselect]

So far, the only people to be censured by any entity in connection with the January 6 insurrection are Republicans who voted to impeach Donny. And the Arizona State Republican Party censured Republican Governor Doug Ducey for refusing to overturn the election.

You can now add South Carolina Representative Tom Rice to the list, censured by his state's Republican party for his impeachment vote.

And you can subtract Trump's lead attorney in the impeachment trial, Butch Bowers (coincidentally from South Carolina) and another South Carolina attorney, Deborah Barbier, from Trump's team. They have quit in a "mutual decision." This probably means that (1) they realized Trump wasn't going to pay, and/or (2) they were leery about their bar licenses if they spouted some of the nonsense that Trump undoubtedly wanted them to say.

Well, there's always Rudy Giuliani.

[Beebs52]

So far, the only people to be censured by any entity in connection with the January 6 insurrection are Republicans who voted to impeach Donny. And the Arizona State Republican Party censured Republican Governor Doug Ducey for refusing to overturn the election.

You can now add South Carolina Representative Tom Rice to the list, censured by his state's Republican party for his impeachment vote.

And you can subtract Trump's lead attorney in the impeachment trial, Butch Bowers (coincidentally from South Carolina) and another South Carolina attorney, Deborah Barbier, from Trump's team. They have quit in a "mutual decision." This probably means that (1) they realized Trump wasn't going to pay, and/or (2) they were leery about their bar licenses if they spouted some of the nonsense that Trump undoubtedly wanted them to say.

Well, there's always Rudy Giuliani.

You have no idea what we're talking about. Bless yur heart.

[silverscreenselect]

So far, the only people to be censured by any entity in connection with the January 6 insurrection are Republicans who voted to impeach Donny. And the Arizona State Republican Party censured Republican Governor Doug Ducey for refusing to overturn the election.

You can now add South Carolina Representative Tom Rice to the list, censured by his state's Republican party for his impeachment vote.

And you can subtract Trump's lead attorney in the impeachment trial, Butch Bowers (coincidentally from South Carolina) and another South Carolina attorney, Deborah Barbier, from Trump's team. They have quit in a "mutual decision." This probably means that (1) they realized Trump wasn't going to pay, and/or (2) they were leery about their bar licenses if they spouted some of the nonsense that Trump undoubtedly wanted them to say.

Well, there's always Rudy Giuliani.

We're now up to five members of the Trump defense team who have headed for the exit doors. I must admit that I was leery about the idea of this impeachment trial beforehand, but it's shaping up to be more and more of a total trainwreck for Trump and his enablers. He still won't be convicted, but the hypocrisy of those like Hawley and Cruz covering for him will become that much more apparent. I'm going to have to stock up on popcorn to watch this play out on CNN.

[tlynn78]

I'd bet the former President would get a chuckle over the little fanboys who can't seem to quit him. Bless their hearts.

[wbtravis007]

I'd bet the former President would get a chuckle over the little fanboys who can't seem to quit him. Bless their hearts.

ICM!

You're too funny.

Don't forget about Hilz and them, Sweetie Pie.

[Bob Juch]

I'd bet the former President would get a chuckle over the little fanboys who can't seem to quit him. Bless their hearts.

You mean like the ones who gave him $30 million after he lost?

[wbtravis007]

I'd bet the former President would get a chuckle over the little fanboys who can't seem to quit him. Bless their hearts.

You mean like the ones who gave him $30 million after he lost?

I've seen 170 million, and wouldn't be surprised if that's right.

[silverscreenselect]

I'd bet the former President would get a chuckle over the little fanboys who can't seem to quit him. Bless their hearts.

You mean like the ones who gave him $30 million after he lost?

I've seen 170 million, and wouldn't be surprised if that's right.

Either total brings to mind the old adage about a fool and his money...