WWTBAM Bored

Joe Biden has just been declared the winner in Pennsylvania and therefore the winner of the national election!

Joe needs to keep a sharp eye on Kamala and Nancy vis a vis the 25th amendment.

Beebs52 wrote: ↑

Sat Nov 07, 2020 11:19 am

Joe needs to keep a sharp eye on Kamala and Nancy vis a vis the 25th amendment.

What? Do you think they'll knock him off?

Bob Juch wrote: ↑

Sat Nov 07, 2020 11:32 am

Beebs52 wrote: ↑

Sat Nov 07, 2020 11:19 am

Joe needs to keep a sharp eye on Kamala and Nancy vis a vis the 25th amendment.

What? Do you think they'll knock him off?

Is that projection? I was just thinking mental acuity etc.

Beebs52 wrote: ↑

Sat Nov 07, 2020 11:38 am

Bob Juch wrote: ↑

Sat Nov 07, 2020 11:32 am

Beebs52 wrote: ↑

Sat Nov 07, 2020 11:19 am

Joe needs to keep a sharp eye on Kamala and Nancy vis a vis the 25th amendment.

What? Do you think they'll knock him off?

Is that projection? I was just thinking mental acuity etc.

To suspend him from office would take a majority vote by the cabinet he appointed. There's not much of a chance of that happening. He's clearly more cognizant than Trump, anyway.

We all have our comforting delusions.

"Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of..."

Beebs52 wrote: ↑

Sat Nov 07, 2020 11:19 am

Joe needs to keep a sharp eye on Kamala and Nancy vis a vis the 25th amendment.

I think they will be more worried about the violence of the radical Trumpsters. From outside, your 25th should have been invoked 3 years ago.

Beebs52 wrote: ↑

Sat Nov 07, 2020 12:22 pm

"Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of..."

That would mean the President's cabinet would have to turn on him.

Bob Juch wrote: ↑

Sat Nov 07, 2020 12:26 pm

Beebs52 wrote: ↑

Sat Nov 07, 2020 12:22 pm

"Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of..."

That would mean the President's cabinet would have to turn on him.

What about "or other" don't you get?

Beebs52 wrote: ↑

Sat Nov 07, 2020 12:32 pm

Bob Juch wrote: ↑

Sat Nov 07, 2020 12:26 pm

Beebs52 wrote: ↑

Sat Nov 07, 2020 12:22 pm

"Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of..."

That would mean the President's cabinet would have to turn on him.

What about "or other" don't you get?

What about "Congress may by law provide" don't you get? They have not.

Bob Juch wrote: ↑

Sat Nov 07, 2020 12:41 pm

Beebs52 wrote: ↑

Sat Nov 07, 2020 12:32 pm

Bob Juch wrote: ↑

Sat Nov 07, 2020 12:26 pm

That would mean the President's cabinet would have to turn on him.

What about "or other" don't you get?

What about "Congress may by law provide" don't you get? They have not.

Um, dude, that's because no one has invoked it yet. ???

Beebs52 wrote: ↑

Sat Nov 07, 2020 12:22 pm

"Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of..."

Congress has not by law provided a different body. To do so would require both Houses of Congress to pass a law so designating and the then-current President signing it, allowing it to become law without his signature, or having his veto overridden. --Bob

Bob78164 wrote: ↑

Sat Nov 07, 2020 1:24 pm

Beebs52 wrote: ↑

Sat Nov 07, 2020 12:22 pm

"Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of..."

Congress has not by law provided a different body. To do so would require both Houses of Congress to pass a law so designating and the then-current President signing it, allowing it to become law without his signature, or having his veto overridden. --Bob

Bingo!

There are those who don't want it to be over, and one in particular is in Congress.

https://www.al.com/news/2020/11/alabama ... ctory.html

At best, all it can do is slow down the inevitable, but to those who still fear the Wrath of Don (or threats of Don Jr.), it gives one last chance to prove their allegiance.

a1mamacat wrote: ↑

Sat Nov 07, 2020 12:24 pm

Beebs52 wrote: ↑

Sat Nov 07, 2020 11:19 am

Joe needs to keep a sharp eye on Kamala and Nancy vis a vis the 25th amendment.

I think they will be more worried about the violence of the radical Trumpsters. From outside, your 25th should have been invoked 3 years ago.

LMAO! Bless your heart

Finding any proof of allegations of voter fraud seems to be as difficult as the Durham investigation finding any evidence of criminal activity in regard to the surveillance of Carter Page.

The latest is a postal worker in Pennsylvania who claimed that his supervisor had ordered him to backdate ballots mail-in ballots that arrived late. Republicans were widely touting this as proof of Democratic fraud. However, when questioned by postal investigators, he recanted the claim. It's amazing how people react when someone explains to them what the consequences for false sworn allegations in cases like this are. Attorneys as well don't want to risk their licenses by putting spurious allegations of fraud in sworn complaints.

The GSA administrator has announced the transition can begin.