Page 3 of 3

Re: RIH Qasem Soleimani and Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis

Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2020 7:12 pm
by Bob Juch
flockofseagulls104 wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2020 5:14 pm
Bob Juch wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2020 3:17 pm
Spock wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2020 11:55 am
Funny how those questioning the intel of this strike, just blindly accepted the intel and rationale behind Obama's (AKA Droney McDroneface) 563 drone strikes.

For some reason, they were pretty quiet then. As extreme partisans, they were just blind partisan followers and implicitly accepted that the intel was perfect and that every one of Droney McDroneface's 563 drone strikes was perfect.
There have been two to three times as many drone strikes under trump as under Obama.
And? You didn't get your panties in a wad then.
It's not the drone strike, it's who was targeted.

Re: RIH Qasem Soleimani and Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis

Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2020 10:06 pm
by silverscreenselect
flockofseagulls104 wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2020 5:11 pm
I look at it the other way. It's the Iranians who already have a war going and if they don't want their generals killed, maybe they ought to stop doing things like attacking our embassies.
Gee, it's funny how three years ago, things were getting better with Iran and they were moving away from a nuclear program and relations were improving.

I wonder what could have happened to change all that.

Re: RIH Qasem Soleimani and Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis

Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2020 10:08 pm
by silverscreenselect
flockofseagulls104 wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2020 5:11 pm
Wait a minute! I thought lying about the ukraine phone call was that what you said.
I'm kind of curious Flock. Do any of Trump's lies bother you? Or do you just believe every word that comes out of his mouth?

Re: RIH Qasem Soleimani and Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis

Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2020 11:30 pm
by flockofseagulls104
silverscreenselect wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2020 10:08 pm
flockofseagulls104 wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2020 5:11 pm
Wait a minute! I thought lying about the ukraine phone call was that what you said.
I'm kind of curious Flock. Do any of Trump's lies bother you? Or do you just believe every word that comes out of his mouth?
I'm curious too. The number of outright lies that the msm and dems have told ABOUT him kinda shifts the scales. As I've told you MANY, MANY times, but never seems to get through to you, as bad as he might be, he is God's gift compared to even the best, if there is one, from your political party. Instead of your obsession with telling me that I'm in the tank for trump all the time, you might start looking at yourself and your deep hatred of the guy. It's kinda sick, but you have lots of
reinforcement from the propaganda machine.
What is the attraction to hating the guy and any one else that doesn't hate him? Why do you think it's a terrible insult to me to accuse me of supporting him when he does something I agree with? Do you go around wanting to spit at any stranger you might see wearing a maga hat or trump t shirt? Does it make you feel part of some kind of special, superior group? Clinton, Obama and every president and politician past or present have lied to us about important things all our lives. Have you gotten this bonkers about "I never had sexual relations..." or "if you like your doctor..."? Why do you obsess about everything trump says? And why do you think I should indulge in your hateful obsession?

Re: RIH Qasem Soleimani and Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis

Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 1:03 pm
by Bob Juch
flockofseagulls104 wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2020 11:30 pm
silverscreenselect wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2020 10:08 pm
flockofseagulls104 wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2020 5:11 pm
Wait a minute! I thought lying about the ukraine phone call was that what you said.
I'm kind of curious Flock. Do any of Trump's lies bother you? Or do you just believe every word that comes out of his mouth?
I'm curious too. The number of outright lies that the msm and dems have told ABOUT him kinda shifts the scales. As I've told you MANY, MANY times, but never seems to get through to you, as bad as he might be, he is God's gift compared to even the best, if there is one, from your political party. Instead of your obsession with telling me that I'm in the tank for trump all the time, you might start looking at yourself and your deep hatred of the guy. It's kinda sick, but you have lots of
reinforcement from the propaganda machine.
What is the attraction to hating the guy and any one else that doesn't hate him? Why do you think it's a terrible insult to me to accuse me of supporting him when he does something I agree with? Do you go around wanting to spit at any stranger you might see wearing a maga hat or trump t shirt? Does it make you feel part of some kind of special, superior group? Clinton, Obama and every president and politician past or present have lied to us about important things all our lives. Have you gotten this bonkers about "I never had sexual relations..." or "if you like your doctor..."? Why do you obsess about everything trump says? And why do you think I should indulge in your hateful obsession?
Let's see: The last thing trump did that you approved of was tweeting his support of a group of Iranians who were chanting "Death to liars." Ironic.

Re: RIH Qasem Soleimani and Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis

Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 2:06 pm
by silverscreenselect
flockofseagulls104 wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2020 11:30 pm
as bad as he might be, he is God's gift compared to even the best, if there is one, from your political party.
That is this century's equivalent of "Mussolini made the trains run on time." Except Trump couldn't do that.

Re: RIH Qasem Soleimani and Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis

Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 4:07 pm
by flockofseagulls104
Bob Juch wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 1:03 pm
flockofseagulls104 wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2020 11:30 pm
silverscreenselect wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2020 10:08 pm


I'm kind of curious Flock. Do any of Trump's lies bother you? Or do you just believe every word that comes out of his mouth?
I'm curious too. The number of outright lies that the msm and dems have told ABOUT him kinda shifts the scales. As I've told you MANY, MANY times, but never seems to get through to you, as bad as he might be, he is God's gift compared to even the best, if there is one, from your political party. Instead of your obsession with telling me that I'm in the tank for trump all the time, you might start looking at yourself and your deep hatred of the guy. It's kinda sick, but you have lots of
reinforcement from the propaganda machine.
What is the attraction to hating the guy and any one else that doesn't hate him? Why do you think it's a terrible insult to me to accuse me of supporting him when he does something I agree with? Do you go around wanting to spit at any stranger you might see wearing a maga hat or trump t shirt? Does it make you feel part of some kind of special, superior group? Clinton, Obama and every president and politician past or present have lied to us about important things all our lives. Have you gotten this bonkers about "I never had sexual relations..." or "if you like your doctor..."? Why do you obsess about everything trump says? And why do you think I should indulge in your hateful obsession?
Let's see: The last thing trump did that you approved of was tweeting his support of a group of Iranians who were chanting "Death to liars." Ironic.
It's pointless thinking you would ever do any introspection. They were chanting 'death to liars' referring to their own leaders lying about the plane crash. but you knew that. There was also anecdotal footage of people refusing to do the old stomp on the American Flag bit. Just anecdotal, for sure, but the people in the footage seem to have more regard for America than Colin Kaepernick, for sure, and probably you.

Do you spit on trump supporters? Just askin.....

Re: RIH Qasem Soleimani and Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis

Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 4:10 pm
by flockofseagulls104
silverscreenselect wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 2:06 pm
flockofseagulls104 wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2020 11:30 pm
as bad as he might be, he is God's gift compared to even the best, if there is one, from your political party.
That is this century's equivalent of "Mussolini made the trains run on time." Except Trump couldn't do that.
As opposed to what? Your group of idiots who want to ban airplanes altogether? I'll lower myself to your level. Trump isn't in charge of any trains. But if he was, I'll bet they'd run on time.
Quit trying to apply history. You obviously don't know much.

Re: RIH Qasem Soleimani and Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis

Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 4:37 pm
by Bob78164
flockofseagulls104 wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 4:10 pm
silverscreenselect wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 2:06 pm
flockofseagulls104 wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2020 11:30 pm
as bad as he might be, he is God's gift compared to even the best, if there is one, from your political party.
That is this century's equivalent of "Mussolini made the trains run on time." Except Trump couldn't do that.
As opposed to what? Your group of idiots who want to ban airplanes altogether? I'll lower myself to your level. Trump isn't in charge of any trains. But if he was, I'll bet they'd run on time.
Quit trying to apply history. You obviously don't know much.
I'm very skeptical of the management skills of anyone who could manage to go bankrupt running a casino. --Bob

Re: RIH Qasem Soleimani and Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis

Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 7:00 pm
by Estonut
Bob78164 wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 4:37 pm
flockofseagulls104 wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 4:10 pm
silverscreenselect wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 2:06 pm
That is this century's equivalent of "Mussolini made the trains run on time." Except Trump couldn't do that.
As opposed to what? Your group of idiots who want to ban airplanes altogether? I'll lower myself to your level. Trump isn't in charge of any trains. But if he was, I'll bet they'd run on time.
Quit trying to apply history. You obviously don't know much.
I'm very skeptical of the management skills of anyone who could manage to go bankrupt running a casino.
You seem to have forgotten that he DID manage to beat the most qualified, best-prepared U.S. Presidential candidate in history.

Re: RIH Qasem Soleimani and Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis

Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 7:05 pm
by flockofseagulls104
Estonut wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 7:00 pm
Bob78164 wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 4:37 pm
flockofseagulls104 wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 4:10 pm
As opposed to what? Your group of idiots who want to ban airplanes altogether? I'll lower myself to your level. Trump isn't in charge of any trains. But if he was, I'll bet they'd run on time.
Quit trying to apply history. You obviously don't know much.
I'm very skeptical of the management skills of anyone who could manage to go bankrupt running a casino.
You seem to have forgotten that he DID manage to beat the most qualified, best-prepared U.S. Presidential candidate in history.
Not to mention the smartest.
Why wasn't she smart enough to get Vlad to elect her?

Re: RIH Qasem Soleimani and Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis

Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 7:12 pm
by Bob78164
Estonut wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 7:00 pm
Bob78164 wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 4:37 pm
flockofseagulls104 wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 4:10 pm
As opposed to what? Your group of idiots who want to ban airplanes altogether? I'll lower myself to your level. Trump isn't in charge of any trains. But if he was, I'll bet they'd run on time.
Quit trying to apply history. You obviously don't know much.
I'm very skeptical of the management skills of anyone who could manage to go bankrupt running a casino.
You seem to have forgotten that he DID manage to beat the most qualified, best-prepared U.S. Presidential candidate in history.
If it weren't for James Comey, he'd have lost to the most unpopular U.S. Presidential candidate in history. --Bob

Re: RIH Qasem Soleimani and Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis

Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 7:15 pm
by Estonut
Bob78164 wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 7:12 pm
Estonut wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 7:00 pm
Bob78164 wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 4:37 pm
I'm very skeptical of the management skills of anyone who could manage to go bankrupt running a casino.
You seem to have forgotten that he DID manage to beat the most qualified, best-prepared U.S. Presidential candidate in history.
If it weren't for James Comey, he'd have lost to the most unpopular U.S. Presidential candidate in history.
If it weren't for James Comey, she might be in jail right now.

Re: RIH Qasem Soleimani and Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis

Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 7:23 pm
by Beebs52
Estonut wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 7:15 pm
Bob78164 wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 7:12 pm
Estonut wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 7:00 pm
You seem to have forgotten that he DID manage to beat the most qualified, best-prepared U.S. Presidential candidate in history.
If it weren't for James Comey, he'd have lost to the most unpopular U.S. Presidential candidate in history.
If it weren't for James Comey, she might be in jail right now.
Snicker snort. Ya think?

Re: RIH Qasem Soleimani and Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis

Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 7:49 pm
by Bob78164
Estonut wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 7:15 pm
Bob78164 wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 7:12 pm
Estonut wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 7:00 pm
You seem to have forgotten that he DID manage to beat the most qualified, best-prepared U.S. Presidential candidate in history.
If it weren't for James Comey, he'd have lost to the most unpopular U.S. Presidential candidate in history.
If it weren't for James Comey, she might be in jail right now.
Donny's Justice Department appears to disagree. Or did you miss that story? --Bob

Re: RIH Qasem Soleimani and Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis

Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 8:52 pm
by flockofseagulls104
Bob78164 wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 7:49 pm
Estonut wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 7:15 pm
Bob78164 wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 7:12 pm
If it weren't for James Comey, he'd have lost to the most unpopular U.S. Presidential candidate in history.
If it weren't for James Comey, she might be in jail right now.
Donny's Justice Department appears to disagree. Or did you miss that story? --Bob
Let's wait to see what Durham thinks.

Re: RIH Qasem Soleimani and Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis

Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 12:02 pm
by silverscreenselect
flockofseagulls104 wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 8:52 pm
Bob78164 wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 7:49 pm
Estonut wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 7:15 pm
If it weren't for James Comey, she might be in jail right now.
Donny's Justice Department appears to disagree. Or did you miss that story? --Bob
Let's wait to see what Durham thinks.
While Flock is off somewhere wondering what happened to Operation Ripcord and all that cellphone data, I thought I'd bring up another one of his golden oldie favorites, the Durham investigation that was supposed to produce all that dirt on Hillary, Biden, Comey, take your pick of Democratic operatives. It appears that Durham's grand jury has closed up shop and he's preparing his final report. The score to date:

1 guilty plea (resulting in no jail time) on a technical charge by a Justice Department attorney who was outed by the Inspector General before Durham started his investigation.

1 indictment in the Sussman case against a prominent Democratic lawyer on a charge of lying to the FBI. The trial resulted in an acquittal on all charges after about two minutes of deliberation.

1 pending trial against Igor Danchenko, a Russian who allegedly was a source for the Steele dossier. Danchenko has been charged with lying to the FBI. Unfortunately, the key witness is out of the country and refuses to return, making a successful prosecution highly problematic. Danchenko told the FBI that he had met several times with Sergei Millian, a Belorusian, about the Steele dossier. (The FBI thinks Millian may be a Russian spy.) Millian denied ever meeting Danchenko, and Durham is relying on this he said-he said dispute between Danchenko and Millian as the basis for their claim Danchenko lied to the FBI. Now, Millian refuses to return to the US to testify, claiming fear he may be arrested himself.

This is what Fox News and Flock were tooting the horn about for the last three years.

https://kesq.com/news/2022/09/14/john-d ... al-stages/