WWTBAM Bored

Here's the bipartisan report of the Senate Intelligence Committee detailing many of Russia's efforts to interfere with our democracy. They interfered with the Republican (and Democratic) primaries as well as with the general election, all to support Donny. I wonder why. --Bob

Bob78164 wrote:I wonder why. --Bob

I don't. Russia and Ukraine are not friends, therefore they would support the candidate running against the one with strong financial and illicit ties to Ukraine.

Oh, and have you read Mossad's report on the U.S.'s efforts to interfere with Israeli elections? Did you question "why"?

BackInTex wrote:Oh, and have you read Mossad's report on the U.S.'s efforts to interfere with Israeli elections? Did you question "why"?

No, because I really don't care that much. That may be an offense to Israeli sensibilities (if it happened). But it's not interference with our democratic process. --Bob

BackInTex wrote:

Bob78164 wrote:I wonder why. --Bob

I don't. Russia and Ukraine are not friends, therefore they would support the candidate running against the one with strong financial and illicit ties to Ukraine.

Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, and Jeb Bush have strong financial and illicit ties to Ukraine? --Bob

So, you've abandoned the difficult question of why you have appointed yourself the arbiter of appropriateness and decided to post another batphone entry.
I'm calling you on it.

I have made a pretty good case that you are in fact a hypocrite and full of double standards. You can't just run away from it, post something else and hope it's forgotten. You have pledged to 'call me out' for asking people to stop trolling me when I have addressed a post to some other person because it's not ' appropriate'.
Was your threat to sue me appropriate?

Explain that to us once and for all.

flockofseagulls104 wrote:So, you've abandoned the difficult question of why you have appointed yourself the arbiter of appropriateness and decided to post another batphone entry.
I'm calling you on it.

I have made a pretty good case that you are in fact a hypocrite and full of double standards. You can't just run away from it, post something else and hope it's forgotten. You have pledged to 'call me out' for asking people to stop trolling me when I have addressed a post to some other person because it's not ' appropriate'.
Was your threat to sue me appropriate?

Explain that to us once and for all.

I'm sorry, are you under the misapprehension that I still read most of your posts? You would be wrong about that.

If you think you've made a good case about anything, that's too bad. I don't feel any obligation to learn what gives you that impression, much less respond.

If you think a bipartisan report from the Senate Intelligence Committee (read the link -- it's directly to the Senate's Web site) is straight from the Batphone, then you're even more disconnected from reality than I'd thought. And that's really saying something.

I've told you before and I'll tell you again. I don't read the Batphone. I write it. But I'm not on the Senate Intelligence Committee so they had to do that one without me. --Bob

Bob, no one has really questioned the fact that Russia tried to interfere with our election. No one. No one really questions that they attempted to help Trump's side, though much was just to disrupt our electoral process, or our faith in it. Perhaps they were in cahoots with Ukraine ("Boris, you post shit about Hillary and I'll get Andriy to post shit about Donald").

BackInTex wrote:Bob, no one has really questioned the fact that Russia tried to interfere with our election. No one. No one really questions that they attempted to help Trump's side, though much was just to disrupt our electoral process, or our faith in it. Perhaps they were in cahoots with Ukraine ("Boris, you post shit about Hillary and I'll get Andriy to post shit about Donald").

Explain this:

Facebook Shuts Down Pro-Trump Page Run By Ukrainians
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/facebook ... 8b5932da48

Bob Juch wrote:

BackInTex wrote:Bob, no one has really questioned the fact that Russia tried to interfere with our election. No one. No one really questions that they attempted to help Trump's side, though much was just to disrupt our electoral process, or our faith in it. Perhaps they were in cahoots with Ukraine ("Boris, you post shit about Hillary and I'll get Andriy to post shit about Donald").

Explain this:

Facebook Shuts Down Pro-Trump Page Run By Ukrainians
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/facebook ... 8b5932da48

Huffpost doesn't have a clue what they are talking about.

Bob78164 wrote:

flockofseagulls104 wrote:So, you've abandoned the difficult question of why you have appointed yourself the arbiter of appropriateness and decided to post another batphone entry.
I'm calling you on it.

I have made a pretty good case that you are in fact a hypocrite and full of double standards. You can't just run away from it, post something else and hope it's forgotten. You have pledged to 'call me out' for asking people to stop trolling me when I have addressed a post to some other person because it's not ' appropriate'.
Was your threat to sue me appropriate?

Explain that to us once and for all.

I'm sorry, are you under the misapprehension that I still read most of your posts? You would be wrong about that.

If you think you've made a good case about anything, that's too bad. I don't feel any obligation to learn what gives you that impression, much less respond.

If you think a bipartisan report from the Senate Intelligence Committee (read the link -- it's directly to the Senate's Web site) is straight from the Batphone, then you're even more disconnected from reality than I'd thought. And that's really saying something.

I've told you before and I'll tell you again. I don't read the Batphone. I write it. But I'm not on the Senate Intelligence Committee so they had to do that one without me. --Bob

No I am under no 'misapprehension', BWBJ. It's obvious that you don't read very many of my posts and what you do read, you fail to comprehend. I ask again: Was your threat to sue me appropriate?

flockofseagulls104 wrote:

Bob78164 wrote:

flockofseagulls104 wrote:So, you've abandoned the difficult question of why you have appointed yourself the arbiter of appropriateness and decided to post another batphone entry.
I'm calling you on it.

I have made a pretty good case that you are in fact a hypocrite and full of double standards. You can't just run away from it, post something else and hope it's forgotten. You have pledged to 'call me out' for asking people to stop trolling me when I have addressed a post to some other person because it's not ' appropriate'.
Was your threat to sue me appropriate?

Explain that to us once and for all.

I'm sorry, are you under the misapprehension that I still read most of your posts? You would be wrong about that.

If you think you've made a good case about anything, that's too bad. I don't feel any obligation to learn what gives you that impression, much less respond.

If you think a bipartisan report from the Senate Intelligence Committee (read the link -- it's directly to the Senate's Web site) is straight from the Batphone, then you're even more disconnected from reality than I'd thought. And that's really saying something.

I've told you before and I'll tell you again. I don't read the Batphone. I write it. But I'm not on the Senate Intelligence Committee so they had to do that one without me. --Bob

No I am under no 'misapprehension', BWBJ. It's obvious that you don't read very many of my posts and what you do read, you fail to comprehend. I ask again: Was your threat to sue me appropriate?

You don't care whether it was appropriate. You want to know whether I was serious.

Defame me again and you'll find out. --Bob

Bob78164 wrote:

flockofseagulls104 wrote:

Bob78164 wrote:I'm sorry, are you under the misapprehension that I still read most of your posts? You would be wrong about that.

If you think you've made a good case about anything, that's too bad. I don't feel any obligation to learn what gives you that impression, much less respond.

If you think a bipartisan report from the Senate Intelligence Committee (read the link -- it's directly to the Senate's Web site) is straight from the Batphone, then you're even more disconnected from reality than I'd thought. And that's really saying something.

I've told you before and I'll tell you again. I don't read the Batphone. I write it. But I'm not on the Senate Intelligence Committee so they had to do that one without me. --Bob

No I am under no 'misapprehension', BWBJ. It's obvious that you don't read very many of my posts and what you do read, you fail to comprehend. I ask again: Was your threat to sue me appropriate?

You don't care whether it was appropriate. You want to know whether I was serious.

Defame me again and you'll find out. --Bob

Wow. Consider yourself redefamed. Anyone else want to jump in? He can make it a class action.
Redefamation of a caricature. Avatar v Avatar.

Oh, and let me call you out again for your inappropriateness.

I got an idea for yoy, BWBJ. Why don't you sue me on the bored? If there are 12 people left here, you can put together a jury, and argue your case against me. That would be fun, and allow you to parade your above average lawyer stuff for us. It would be a great thread ! Lots of laughs. How about it?

Dup1

My introspection:
I have been personally offended by the words of some people here. But my reactions, on this semi anonymous platform, have, in retrospect, been almost to the same level personally. I will dial it back.

flockofseagulls104 wrote:Dup2

These last two posts of yours make more sense than anything else you've posted in the last year or more.