WWTBAM Bored

Hey sss, I mean elevation of discussion. Crazies.
Thanks.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.co ... index.html

Beebs52 wrote:Hey sss, I mean elevation of discussion. Crazies.
Thanks.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.co ... index.html

Of course, the difference being that neither Sanders nor any Democrat villified Pete Scalise the way Trump has called out Illhan Omar, including belittling her again in a speech the day after the man was arrested for making threats about her (Sanders immediately denounced the shooting by his former supporter).

Trump continues to stir the pot, and the crazies take him at his word.

silverscreenselect wrote:Trump continues to stir the pot, and the crazies take him at his word.

These people are crazy. How do you know they wouldn't do the same thing if Hillary were president? Maybe she'd stir up MORE of them. Would that, then, be HER fault?

Estonut wrote:

silverscreenselect wrote:Trump continues to stir the pot, and the crazies take him at his word.

These people are crazy. How do you know they wouldn't do the same thing if Hillary were president? Maybe she'd stir up MORE of them. Would that, then, be HER fault?

I'm fairly confident we wouldn't have seen the amount of hateful, divisive language that comes from Trump on a daily basis. This guy isn't an isolated crazy; he's just the latest.

silverscreenselect wrote:

Estonut wrote:

silverscreenselect wrote:Trump continues to stir the pot, and the crazies take him at his word.

These people are crazy. How do you know they wouldn't do the same thing if Hillary were president? Maybe she'd stir up MORE of them. Would that, then, be HER fault?

I'm fairly confident we wouldn't have seen the amount of hateful, divisive language that comes from Trump on a daily basis. This guy isn't an isolated crazy; he's just the latest.

Where's the proof linking one to the other?

If your "certainty" were valid proof of anything, Hillary WOULD BE President right now, wouldn't she?

hateful, divisive language

The epitome of batphone language. Right up there with 'tax cuts for the rich'. Can't you just for once think for yourself instead of using groupthink?

flockofseagulls104 wrote:

hateful, divisive language

The epitome of batphone language. Right up there with 'tax cuts for the rich'. Can't you just for once think for yourself instead of using groupthink?

Do you ever listen to Trump rather than just start ranting about the batphone?

silverscreenselect wrote:

flockofseagulls104 wrote:

hateful, divisive language

The epitome of batphone language. Right up there with 'tax cuts for the rich'. Can't you just for once think for yourself instead of using groupthink?

Do you ever listen to Trump rather than just start ranting about the batphone?

Yes, I listen to what he actually says, not what pundits and propagandists interpret what he says. I think you should do more of that instead of parroting phrases like 'hateful and divisive', polly.

flockofseagulls104 wrote:

silverscreenselect wrote:

flockofseagulls104 wrote: The epitome of batphone language. Right up there with 'tax cuts for the rich'. Can't you just for once think for yourself instead of using groupthink?

Do you ever listen to Trump rather than just start ranting about the batphone?

Yes, I listen to what he actually says, not what pundits and propagandists interpret what he says. I think you should do more of that instead of parroting phrases like 'hateful and divisive', polly.

When you have to repeatedly parse his words and try to come up with strain to come up with innocent interpretations of them, then you're in the tank for him.

silverscreenselect wrote:

flockofseagulls104 wrote:

silverscreenselect wrote:
Do you ever listen to Trump rather than just start ranting about the batphone?

Yes, I listen to what he actually says, not what pundits and propagandists interpret what he says. I think you should do more of that instead of parroting phrases like 'hateful and divisive', polly.

When you have to repeatedly parse his words and try to come up with strain to come up with innocent interpretations of them, then you're in the tank for him.

Like when he said there are good people on both sides that means he is the grand wizard of the KKK? Like that, Polly? Like when he says that MS-13 members are animals that means he hates all hispanic people? Like that, Polly? Teach me how to do that.

flockofseagulls104 wrote: Like when he says that MS-13 members are animals that means he hates all hispanic people?

Donald Trump wrote:“We have people coming into the country, or trying to come in — and we’re stopping a lot of them — but we’re taking people out of the country. You wouldn’t believe how bad these people are. These aren’t people. These are animals. And we’re taking them out of the country at a level and at a rate that’s never happened before.”

So, you can go back and mention that one of the other participants in that meeting mentioned MS-13 and argue that Trump wasn't referring to all immigrants but just MS-13. Again, that's a matter of interpretation where you have to parse Trump's words and adopt the more innocent explanation. And not just this once, but over and over again you have to adopt Trump's after-the-fact rationale of what he meant to say.

The old saying goes, "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me." Trump has fooled you so many times you should be in the Hall of Shame Hall of Fame.

silverscreenselect wrote:

flockofseagulls104 wrote: Like when he says that MS-13 members are animals that means he hates all hispanic people?

Donald Trump wrote:“We have people coming into the country, or trying to come in — and we’re stopping a lot of them — but we’re taking people out of the country. You wouldn’t believe how bad these people are. These aren’t people. These are animals. And we’re taking them out of the country at a level and at a rate that’s never happened before.”

So, you can go back and mention that one of the other participants in that meeting mentioned MS-13 and argue that Trump wasn't referring to all immigrants but just MS-13. Again, that's a matter of interpretation where you have to parse Trump's words and adopt the more innocent explanation. And not just this once, but over and over again you have to adopt Trump's after-the-fact rationale of what he meant to say.

The old saying goes, "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me." Trump has fooled you so many times you should be in the Hall of Shame Hall of Fame.

C,mon Polly. Teach me how not to know the difference between immigrants and illegal immigrants. That way when I listen to one of the 'journalists' you mimic do it I can just accept it and not question it. Teach me all the dog whistles you know that allow you to take what people actually say and turn it into what you want it to mean. Teach me how to know that the federal government is my best friend and the people who get elected are bestowed all encompassing grace and knowledge, except if they are republican. Teach me to recognize that democrats have no ulterior motives for anything except to do good and noble things, and that base partisan and self serving motives only exist for republicans.
C'mon. I want to be as stupid as you.

I guess my point was, rather than thinking my post would be ignored like sss's...that this was an example where someone ACTUALLY shot people. Silly me.

Beebs52 wrote:I guess my point was, rather than thinking my post would be ignored like sss's...that this was an example where someone ACTUALLY shot people. Silly me.

The difference is that (as least as far as I know) nothing that Senator Sanders has ever said can be remotely construed as advocating violence against political opponents. That's not true of Donny. --Bob

Bob78164 wrote:

Beebs52 wrote:I guess my point was, rather than thinking my post would be ignored like sss's...that this was an example where someone ACTUALLY shot people. Silly me.

The difference is that (as least as far as I know) nothing that Senator Sanders has ever said can be remotely construed as advocating violence against political opponents. That's not true of Donny. --Bob

You and your ilk are insufferable moooorons. Annoying even. No wonder you lost.

Beebs52 wrote:I guess my point was, rather than thinking my post would be ignored like sss's...that this was an example where someone ACTUALLY shot people. Silly me.

You mean like this guy, who ACTUALLY mailed bombs to people.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/al ... nt-n985786

Or the guy in New Zealand who viewed Trump as a "symbol of renewed white identity and common purpose" and ACTUALLY killed 50 people.

silverscreenselect wrote:

Beebs52 wrote:I guess my point was, rather than thinking my post would be ignored like sss's...that this was an example where someone ACTUALLY shot people. Silly me.

You mean like this guy, who ACTUALLY mailed bombs to people.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/al ... nt-n985786

Or the guy in New Zealand who viewed Trump as a "symbol of renewed white identity and common purpose" and ACTUALLY killed 50 people.

Oooh. Where's whatabout when ya need it?

Forget whatabout.

Mooom! He/she started it!

Beebs52 wrote:Forget whatabout.

Mooom! He/she started it!

Neener. And also, neener.

tlynn78 wrote:

Beebs52 wrote:Forget whatabout.

Mooom! He/she started it!

Neener. And also, neener.

You forgot the third neener. You're a dem plant.

Beebs52 wrote:

tlynn78 wrote:

Beebs52 wrote:Forget whatabout.

Mooom! He/she started it!

Neener. And also, neener.

You forgot the third neener. You're a dem plant.

Nope. Russssskie.

tlynn78 wrote:

Beebs52 wrote:

tlynn78 wrote:

Neener. And also, neener.

You forgot the third neener. You're a dem plant.

Nope. Russssskie.

Same thing! I bet you vacation in Venezuela.

Beebs52 wrote:

tlynn78 wrote:

Beebs52 wrote:
You forgot the third neener. You're a dem plant.

Nope. Russssskie.

Same thing! I bet you vacation in Venezuela.

All the cool kids do.

tlynn78 wrote:

Beebs52 wrote:

tlynn78 wrote:

Nope. Russssskie.

Same thing! I bet you vacation in Venezuela.

All the cool kids do.

So has your Huawei contact called???

Beebs52 wrote:

tlynn78 wrote:

Beebs52 wrote: Same thing! I bet you vacation in Venezuela.

All the cool kids do.

So has your Huawei contact called???

I could tell you, but then I'd have to, well, you know...