Yeah, you did. You expressed glee when suitguy noted the Justice Department's papers trying to let Flynn off the hook.tlynn78 wrote: ↑Tue May 26, 2020 12:56 pmI don't recall expressing an opinion on that subject, Bob. I hate to break it to you, but you're not entitled to my opinion on your demand. I will say maybe stay in your lane when expressing legal opinions would be a good idea. Whether I approve of anyone lying to anyone isn't the issue; what is the issue is that what they got on Flynn is what's called in legalese "fruit of the poisonous tree." You don't get to gather evidence illegally and then use it. At least, that's the way it's supposed to work when everyone is playing by the same set of rules.Bob78164 wrote: ↑Tue May 26, 2020 11:47 amNot an answer. Why are you okay with the National Security Advisor lying to the FBI about his contacts with the Russian government during a counterintelligence investigation? --Bobtlynn78 wrote: ↑Tue May 26, 2020 9:50 am
Just stumbled across this little gem! Upset that " from the lawyer and the elected Republican court official why they're okay with the National Security Advisor lying to the FBI ..." - this from the Very Good Attorney who ".. didn't swear to uphold any laws at all"
You just can't make this stuff up.
No one even claims the FBI did anything illegal in questioning Flynn. They're arguing that the lies Flynn admitted telling weren't material. So the Department of Justice is now on record as saying that the National Security Advisor lying to the FBI about his contacts and communications with the Russian Government weren't material to a counterintelligence investigation involving the Russian Government.
One set of rules for Donny's friends, a different set of rules for the rest of us. That's what you're trying to defend. --Bob