WWTBAM Bored

TACOMA, Wash – A new billboard in South Tacoma is raising eyebrows – not for what it’s selling, but for the message that it’s trying to send.

A group called Tacoma Against Nazis paid to erect a billboard along Pacific Avenue to fight what it sees as white supremacy encroaching into their neighborhood.

The organization says its group of about 100 people have been fighting against a local business they believe has ties to white supremacy. And while for now it’s just the billboard, the group promises to become more active in their fight against injustice.

More: https://q13fox.com/2018/07/11/tacoma-bi ... neighbors/

Still, until all feel welcome in Tacoma, Knigge says her group will continue their fight against prejudice.

How does this sign make the Nazis feel welcome?

Bob Juch wrote:

TACOMA, Wash – A new billboard in South Tacoma is raising eyebrows – not for what it’s selling, but for the message that it’s trying to send.

A group called Tacoma Against Nazis paid to erect a billboard along Pacific Avenue to fight what it sees as white supremacy encroaching into their neighborhood.

The organization says its group of about 100 people have been fighting against a local business they believe has ties to white supremacy. And while for now it’s just the billboard, the group promises to become more active in their fight against injustice.

More: https://q13fox.com/2018/07/11/tacoma-bi ... neighbors/

Tacoma doesn't seem to be home to quite as many nutjobs as Seattle, but I guess some of them are migrating south. I'd like to see what their 'evidence' is, if they have any.

flockofseagulls104 wrote:

Bob Juch wrote:

TACOMA, Wash – A new billboard in South Tacoma is raising eyebrows – not for what it’s selling, but for the message that it’s trying to send.

A group called Tacoma Against Nazis paid to erect a billboard along Pacific Avenue to fight what it sees as white supremacy encroaching into their neighborhood.

The organization says its group of about 100 people have been fighting against a local business they believe has ties to white supremacy. And while for now it’s just the billboard, the group promises to become more active in their fight against injustice.

More: https://q13fox.com/2018/07/11/tacoma-bi ... neighbors/

Tacoma doesn't seem to be home to quite as many nutjobs as Seattle, but I guess some of them are migrating south. I'd like to see what their 'evidence' is, if they have any.

I guess you didn't read the whole article.

Bob Juch wrote:

flockofseagulls104 wrote:

Bob Juch wrote:
More: https://q13fox.com/2018/07/11/tacoma-bi ... neighbors/

Tacoma doesn't seem to be home to quite as many nutjobs as Seattle, but I guess some of them are migrating south. I'd like to see what their 'evidence' is, if they have any.

I guess you didn't read the whole article.

Yes, BJ, I can read. What is it that you think I missed?

BackInTex wrote:

Still, until all feel welcome in Tacoma, Knigge says her group will continue their fight against prejudice.

How does this sign make the Nazis feel welcome?

As Minister Of Propaganda, I clearly feel very unwelcome by my new neighbors in Tacoma. Especially after all of the new jobs I have created building my planned concentration camp, where the sponsors of this billboard will be sent once it is complete!

MinisterOfPropaganda wrote:

BackInTex wrote:

Still, until all feel welcome in Tacoma, Knigge says her group will continue their fight against prejudice.

How does this sign make the Nazis feel welcome?

As Minister Of Propaganda, I clearly feel very unwelcome by my new neighbors in Tacoma. Especially after all of the new jobs I have created building my planned concentration camp, where the sponsors of this billboard will be sent once it is complete!

Kudos to trump for farming his concentration camp plans out to the private sector. This will save the taxpayers a lot of money.

flockofseagulls104 wrote:

Bob Juch wrote:

flockofseagulls104 wrote: Tacoma doesn't seem to be home to quite as many nutjobs as Seattle, but I guess some of them are migrating south. I'd like to see what their 'evidence' is, if they have any.

I guess you didn't read the whole article.

Yes, BJ, I can read. What is it that you think I missed?

The evidence.

Bob Juch wrote:

flockofseagulls104 wrote:

Bob Juch wrote: I guess you didn't read the whole article.

Yes, BJ, I can read. What is it that you think I missed?

The evidence.

What evidence? That there were handbills that included a link to a 'white supremacist' website? What website? I'd like to see what they consider a 'white supremacist' website before I make any conclusion.

flockofseagulls104 wrote: I'd like to see what they consider a 'white supremacist' website before I make any conclusion.

www.whitehouse.gov

flockofseagulls104 wrote:

Bob Juch wrote:

flockofseagulls104 wrote:Yes, BJ, I can read. What is it that you think I missed?

The evidence.

What evidence? That there were handbills that included a link to a 'white supremacist' website? What website? I'd like to see what they consider a 'white supremacist' website before I make any conclusion.

Maybe you missed the evidence where the police said this is a big nothingburger.

silverscreenselect wrote:

flockofseagulls104 wrote: I'd like to see what they consider a 'white supremacist' website before I make any conclusion.

http://www.whitehouse.gov

More like http://www.silverscreenvideos.com

I've never known Trump to say that there was something funny about assuming an African-American man would kill his white cellmate.

This is where I casually mention that Ms. Tami Lynn K. formerly of Tacoma Washington (at least according to her area code) recently agreed to marry me. Having spent most of her life in Washington State she moved to the Sandlapper State where she fell in with a bad crowd and this is the result. She has indicated the commies outnumber any remanant of neo-Nazis in the Tacoma area.

Don't let odd stories like this distract you from the real Nazis out there.

He said he was ‘going to burn down the building with all the f------ Jews,’ Miami Beach cops say

themanintheseersuckersuit wrote:This is where I casually mention that Ms. Tami Lynn K. formerly of Tacoma Washington (at least according to her area code) recently agreed to marry me. Having spent most of her life in Washington State she moved to the Sandlapper State where she fell in with a bad crowd and this is the result. She has indicated the commies outnumber any remanant of neo-Nazis in the Tacoma area.

Congratulations, TMITSSS!

jarnon wrote:Don't let odd stories like this distract you from the real Nazis out there.

He said he was ‘going to burn down the building with all the f------ Jews,’ Miami Beach cops say

I'm going to go on a search for the real Nazis. I mean, I have nothing better to do....

jarnon wrote:Don't let odd stories like this distract you from the real Nazis out there.

He said he was ‘going to burn down the building with all the f------ Jews,’ Miami Beach cops say

And one wonders how Trump won Florida....

silverscreenselect wrote:

jarnon wrote:Don't let odd stories like this distract you from the real Nazis out there.

He said he was ‘going to burn down the building with all the f------ Jews,’ Miami Beach cops say

And one wonders how Trump won Florida....

Not this one. Hillary is why Trump won Florida, and a number of other key states. You and your fellow rabids simply cannot accept the fact that your candidate was considered more flawed than even a problematic Trump, to the point that voters in those key states, who apparently voted Dem for the two previous presidential election, couldn't stomach her.

tlynn78 wrote:Not this one. Hillary is why Trump won Florida, and a number of other key states. You and your fellow rabids simply cannot accept the fact that your candidate was considered more flawed than even a problematic Trump, to the point that voters in those key states, who apparently voted Dem for the two previous presidential election, couldn't stomach her.

Just curious, but aren't you just a little bit concerned about all the Russian activity that has been uncovered in regard to the election, or do you just consider that more fake news and sour grapes?

silverscreenselect wrote:

tlynn78 wrote:Not this one. Hillary is why Trump won Florida, and a number of other key states. You and your fellow rabids simply cannot accept the fact that your candidate was considered more flawed than even a problematic Trump, to the point that voters in those key states, who apparently voted Dem for the two previous presidential election, couldn't stomach her.

Just curious, but aren't you just a little bit concerned about all the Russian activity that has been uncovered in regard to the election, or do you just consider that more fake news and sour grapes?

I'm not stupid enough to believe it hasn't been done for decades, at least; naive enough to think we don't do the same in other countries, or weak-minded enough to cling to it as another excuse for Hillary's loss. So that would be a "no."

tlynn78 wrote:

silverscreenselect wrote:

tlynn78 wrote:Not this one. Hillary is why Trump won Florida, and a number of other key states. You and your fellow rabids simply cannot accept the fact that your candidate was considered more flawed than even a problematic Trump, to the point that voters in those key states, who apparently voted Dem for the two previous presidential election, couldn't stomach her.

Just curious, but aren't you just a little bit concerned about all the Russian activity that has been uncovered in regard to the election, or do you just consider that more fake news and sour grapes?

I'm not stupid enough to believe it hasn't been done for decades, at least; naive enough to think we don't do the same in other countries, or weak-minded enough to cling to it as another excuse for Hillary's loss. So that would be a "no."

And one wonders how Trump won Montana...

silverscreenselect wrote:

tlynn78 wrote:

silverscreenselect wrote:
Just curious, but aren't you just a little bit concerned about all the Russian activity that has been uncovered in regard to the election, or do you just consider that more fake news and sour grapes?

I'm not stupid enough to believe it hasn't been done for decades, at least; naive enough to think we don't do the same in other countries, or weak-minded enough to cling to it as another excuse for Hillary's loss. So that would be a "no."

And one wonders how Trump won Montana...

See above.

silverscreenselect wrote:

tlynn78 wrote:

silverscreenselect wrote:
Just curious, but aren't you just a little bit concerned about all the Russian activity that has been uncovered in regard to the election, or do you just consider that more fake news and sour grapes?

I'm not stupid enough to believe it hasn't been done for decades, at least; naive enough to think we don't do the same in other countries, or weak-minded enough to cling to it as another excuse for Hillary's loss. So that would be a "no."

And one wonders how Trump won Montana...

One wonders how some folks navigate daily life.

silverscreenselect wrote:

tlynn78 wrote:Not this one. Hillary is why Trump won Florida, and a number of other key states. You and your fellow rabids simply cannot accept the fact that your candidate was considered more flawed than even a problematic Trump, to the point that voters in those key states, who apparently voted Dem for the two previous presidential election, couldn't stomach her.

Just curious, but aren't you just a little bit concerned about all the Russian activity that has been uncovered in regard to the election, or do you just consider that more fake news and sour grapes?

SSS,

Stop tying this to Secretary Clinton's loss. You're just enabling whataboutism.

Here's the issue. A hostile foreign government directly intervened in our elections, even going so far as to attempt to directly interfere with our election infrastructure. That same hostile foreign government is continuing and amplifying its efforts. The hostile government's favored candidate won and is taking official actions that directly support long-held foreign policy goals of the hostile foreign power, actions that are having and will continue to have an obvious long-term deleterious effect on the interests of the United States.

The hostile government's favored candidate (now the incumbent) is doing as little as he can get away with to interdict the hostile foreign government's efforts to interfere in future U.S. elections, has refused to implement sanctions against the hostile foreign government that passed Congress by a veto-proof majority, and is about to meet privately with the hostile foreign government's leader.

The hostile foreign government's influence operations have succeeded to such an extent that it has essentially captured one of our country's two major parties, making it all but impossible for a candidate of that party to survive a primary without acquiescing in the hostile foreign government's influence operations. What's worse, that party's office holders have made the collective decision that they would rather preserve their political power than effectively oppose the favored candidate's harmful foreign policy and domestic positions. A number of those office holders are trying to end an independent investigation designed to ascertain the exact extent of the hostile foreign government's interference in our elections and the extent to which American citizens, including the favored candidate's campaign staff, knew of, solicited, and cooperated with the hostile foreign government's actions. A prominent office holder of the favored candidate's party successfully opposed efforts to publicize the hostile foreign government's efforts prior to the election (which might have reduced their success) by threatening to claim the disclosure was a political stunt. We now know, of course, that it was in fact a very real attack on our democracy. That's the issue. --Bob

silverscreenselect wrote:

tlynn78 wrote:

silverscreenselect wrote:Just curious, but aren't you just a little bit concerned about all the Russian activity that has been uncovered in regard to the election, or do you just consider that more fake news and sour grapes?

I'm not stupid enough to believe it hasn't been done for decades, at least; naive enough to think we don't do the same in other countries, or weak-minded enough to cling to it as another excuse for Hillary's loss. So that would be a "no."

And one wonders how Trump won Montana...

Trump would beat her again, were the election tomorrow.