Page 1 of 1
Scaramucci’s Wife Just Filed For Divorce Because Of Trump
Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2017 7:41 pm
by Bob Juch
President Trump has cost his new communications director his marriage.
In his first week with Trump, the notoriously slick but politically ignorant Anthony Scaramucci has turned the disaster of a White House into a humiliating catastrophe. It turns out, his personal life is no better.
The New York Post’s Emily Smith reports that Scaramucci’s wife of three years, Deirdre Ball, has filed divorce papers due to disgust for what friends describe as his “naked political ambition.”
Multiple sources told Smith that Ball is “fed up with his ruthless quest to get close to President Trump, whom she despises.”
“She is tired of his naked ambition, which is so enormous that it left her at her wits’ end,” said one friend.
Ball, who used to work for her now-husband as a vice president of SkyBridge Capital, began dating Scaramucci in 2011, and the couple have two children together.
Ultimately, Scaramucci chose Trump over his wife. And the truth. And integrity. And the American people…
The list goes on.
http://washingtonjournal.com/2017/07/28 ... rce-trump/
Re: Scaramucci’s Wife Just Filed For Divorce Because Of Trum
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2017 11:06 am
by Spock
>>>
President Trump has cost his new communications director his marriage.<<<<
Given our sticklerness for accuracy, I don't think it is fair to say that President Trump cost Scaramucci his marriage.
It would be better to say that Scarramucci's choice to serve Trump cost him his marriage.
Re: Scaramucci’s Wife Just Filed For Divorce Because Of Trum
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2017 11:16 am
by Bob Juch
Spock wrote:>>>
President Trump has cost his new communications director his marriage.<<<<
Given our sticklerness for accuracy, I don't think it is fair to say that President Trump cost Scaramucci his marriage.
It would be better to say that Scarramucci's choice to serve Trump cost him his marriage.
If Trump was a better person that wouldn't be an issue.
Re: Scaramucci’s Wife Just Filed For Divorce Because Of Trum
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2017 3:45 pm
by Beebs52
Bob Juch wrote:Spock wrote:>>>
President Trump has cost his new communications director his marriage.<<<<
Given our sticklerness for accuracy, I don't think it is fair to say that President Trump cost Scaramucci his marriage.
It would be better to say that Scarramucci's choice to serve Trump cost him his marriage.
If Trump was a better person that wouldn't be an issue.
Scaramucci is a creep and fucking crazy. I can say fucking here because I'm not in public service. With that, I don't have even half a fuck to give about his marriage status.
Re: Scaramucci’s Wife Just Filed For Divorce Because Of Trum
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2017 5:42 pm
by Spock
Bob Juch wrote:Spock wrote:>>>
President Trump has cost his new communications director his marriage.<<<<
Given our sticklerness for accuracy, I don't think it is fair to say that President Trump cost Scaramucci his marriage.
It would be better to say that Scarramucci's choice to serve Trump cost him his marriage.
If Trump was a better person that wouldn't be an issue.
I call BS on that. High pressure work environments chew up marriages by the bucketload. not just those working for Trump.
Re: Scaramucci’s Wife Just Filed For Divorce Because Of Trum
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2017 6:23 pm
by BackInTex
I wonder what she would have done if he got caught getting a BJ from his intern.
This doesn't seem as bad, marriage wise.
Re: Scaramucci’s Wife Just Filed For Divorce Because Of Trum
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2017 7:36 pm
by Bob Juch
Spock wrote:Bob Juch wrote:Spock wrote:>>>
President Trump has cost his new communications director his marriage.<<<<
Given our sticklerness for accuracy, I don't think it is fair to say that President Trump cost Scaramucci his marriage.
It would be better to say that Scarramucci's choice to serve Trump cost him his marriage.
If Trump was a better person that wouldn't be an issue.
I call BS on that. High pressure work environments chew up marriages by the bucketload. not just those working for Trump.
Yes, they do, but in this case she said, "If you go to work for Trump, I'm leaving."
Re: Scaramucci’s Wife Just Filed For Divorce Because Of Trum
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2017 7:57 pm
by Bob78164
Spock wrote:Bob Juch wrote:Spock wrote:>>>
President Trump has cost his new communications director his marriage.<<<<
Given our sticklerness for accuracy, I don't think it is fair to say that President Trump cost Scaramucci his marriage.
It would be better to say that Scarramucci's choice to serve Trump cost him his marriage.
If Trump was a better person that wouldn't be an issue.
I call BS on that. High pressure work environments chew up marriages by the bucketload. not just those working for Trump.
According to published reports, it really is about Donny; she can't stand him.
But of all the things I'm worried about, the marital status of some Administration appointee is way the hell down on my list. --Bob
Re: Scaramucci’s Wife Just Filed For Divorce Because Of Trum
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2017 8:11 pm
by Beebs52
Although my responding negates what I'm saying....
Who gives even a scintilla of a flake of a fuck about this?
Re: Scaramucci’s Wife Just Filed For Divorce Because Of Trum
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2017 9:06 pm
by silverscreenselect
A day after a New York newspaper reported that Scaramucci’s wife had filed for divorce, citing his “naked political ambition” as the grounds for the split, Scaramucci took to Twitter and implored reporters to keep his family's business out of the press.
“Family does not need to be drawn into this,” Scaramucci tweeted Saturday morning. “Soon we will learn who in the media has class and who doesn't. No further comments on this.”
Every time I think it's impossible for the Trump administration to go any lower, they do.
It took only one interview for Scaramucci to lose any right to complain about anyone else's lack of class.
Re: Scaramucci’s Wife Just Filed For Divorce Because Of Trum
Posted: Sun Jul 30, 2017 4:57 pm
by flockofseagulls104
Bob Juch wrote:Spock wrote:>>>
President Trump has cost his new communications director his marriage.<<<<
Given our sticklerness for accuracy, I don't think it is fair to say that President Trump cost Scaramucci his marriage.
It would be better to say that Scarramucci's choice to serve Trump cost him his marriage.
If Trump was a better person that wouldn't be an issue.
If you were a better person, I might give some credence to your posts.
Re: Scaramucci’s Wife Just Filed For Divorce Because Of Trum
Posted: Sun Jul 30, 2017 6:54 pm
by Bob78164
flockofseagulls104 wrote:Bob Juch wrote:Spock wrote:>>>
President Trump has cost his new communications director his marriage.<<<<
Given our sticklerness for accuracy, I don't think it is fair to say that President Trump cost Scaramucci his marriage.
It would be better to say that Scarramucci's choice to serve Trump cost him his marriage.
If Trump was a better person that wouldn't be an issue.
If you were a better person, I might give some credence to your posts.
You just can't resist personal insults, can you? --Bob
Re: Scaramucci’s Wife Just Filed For Divorce Because Of Trum
Posted: Sun Jul 30, 2017 11:41 pm
by flockofseagulls104
Bob78164 wrote:flockofseagulls104 wrote:Bob Juch wrote:
If Trump was a better person that wouldn't be an issue.
If you were a better person, I might give some credence to your posts.
You just can't resist personal insults, can you? --Bob
Why can't you resist insulting your president?
Re: Scaramucci’s Wife Just Filed For Divorce Because Of Trum
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 12:39 am
by silvercamaro
Here's my question. Why is it not possible that she filed for divorce simply because he is a foul-mouthed dipstick (whom she may have recently discovered from news reports) worth $85 million (i.e., large settlement)? This woman married her boss, who -- when she started dating him -- already had been married to his first wife for more than two decades. I don't see that she is entitled to any points toward sainthood or "correct" political thought, however you define that.
Moochie reminds me of Rahm Emanuel. At the very least, they have elements of personality in common, along with a matching vocabulary. I wouldn't hire (or vote for) either of them.
Re: Scaramucci’s Wife Just Filed For Divorce Because Of Trum
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 1:15 am
by Bob78164
flockofseagulls104 wrote:Bob78164 wrote:flockofseagulls104 wrote:
If you were a better person, I might give some credence to your posts.
You just can't resist personal insults, can you? --Bob
Why can't you resist insulting your president?
Because high office and political power do not earn respect for a man who believes that the ability to grab unconsenting women by the genitals with impunity is something to brag about. I treat him with the contempt his behavior has earned. Why do you insist on an outward show of respect for a man who exhibits such behavior? Particularly since that outward show of respect enables the behavior to continue. --Bob
Re: Scaramucci’s Wife Just Filed For Divorce Because Of Trum
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 1:17 am
by Bob78164
silvercamaro wrote:Here's my question. Why is it not possible that she filed for divorce simply because he is a foul-mouthed dipstick (whom she may have recently discovered from news reports) worth $85 million (i.e., large settlement)? This woman married her boss, who -- when she started dating him -- already had been married to his first wife for more than two decades. I don't see that she is entitled to any points toward sainthood or "correct" political thought, however you define that.
Moochie reminds me of Rahm Emanuel. At the very least, they have elements of personality in common, along with a matching vocabulary. I wouldn't hire (or vote for) either of them.
It's possible, but published reports have her attributing the decision (which she made during her ninth month of pregnancy) specifically to her contempt for Donny. --Bob
Re: Scaramucci’s Wife Just Filed For Divorce Because Of Trum
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 3:12 am
by silverscreenselect
flockofseagulls104 wrote:Bob78164 wrote:flockofseagulls104 wrote:
If you were a better person, I might give some credence to your posts.
You just can't resist personal insults, can you? --Bob
Why can't you resist insulting your president?
I didn't notice your getting bent out of shape about the insults hurled at Obama on a daily basis.
Re: Scaramucci’s Wife Just Filed For Divorce Because Of Trum
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 8:06 am
by flockofseagulls104
silverscreenselect wrote:flockofseagulls104 wrote:Bob78164 wrote:You just can't resist personal insults, can you? --Bob
Why can't you resist insulting your president?
I didn't notice your getting bent out of shape about the insults hurled at Obama on a daily basis.
Show me one time where I personally insulted Obama. I totally disagreed with his policies, but I never personally insulted him the way the HTH group-think allows.
Re: Scaramucci’s Wife Just Filed
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 8:53 am
by silverscreenselect
flockofseagulls104 wrote:silverscreenselect wrote:flockofseagulls104 wrote:
Why can't you resist insulting your president?
I didn't notice your getting bent out of shape about the insults hurled at Obama on a daily basis.
Show me one time where I personally insulted Obama. I totally disagreed with his policies, but I never personally insulted him the way the HTH group-think allows.
I didn't say you insulted him. I said you didn't express any disagreement with others insulting him.
Re: Scaramucci Out
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 12:48 pm
by silverscreenselect
Well, this didn't take long.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/pol ... 526300001/
Never, ever, ever, ever, ever, underestimate the ability of the Trump administration to surprise you.
Re: Scaramucci’s Wife Just Filed
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 1:02 pm
by flockofseagulls104
silverscreenselect wrote:flockofseagulls104 wrote:silverscreenselect wrote:
I didn't notice your getting bent out of shape about the insults hurled at Obama on a daily basis.
Show me one time where I personally insulted Obama. I totally disagreed with his policies, but I never personally insulted him the way the HTH group-think allows.
I didn't say you insulted him. I said you didn't express any disagreement with others insulting him.
Has anyone on this bored acted like the Pastor, BJ, you and bob towards Obama? I don't recall anyone being personally insulting towards him. If anyone did, I think I would have remembered. I think that is just another liberal narrative. Any criticism of Obama was deemed racist or some other 'ist'.
Re: Scaramucci’s Wife Just Filed
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 1:07 pm
by Bob Juch
flockofseagulls104 wrote:silverscreenselect wrote:flockofseagulls104 wrote:
Show me one time where I personally insulted Obama. I totally disagreed with his policies, but I never personally insulted him the way the HTH group-think allows.
I didn't say you insulted him. I said you didn't express any disagreement with others insulting him.
Has anyone on this bored acted like the Pastor, BJ, you and bob towards Obama? I don't recall anyone being personally insulting towards him. If anyone did, I think I would have remembered. I think that is just another liberal narrative. Any criticism of Obama was deemed racist or some other 'ist'.
There are others outside of this bored. Expand your horizons.
Re: Scaramucci’s Wife Just Filed
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 3:16 pm
by flockofseagulls104
Bob Juch wrote:flockofseagulls104 wrote:silverscreenselect wrote:
I didn't say you insulted him. I said you didn't express any disagreement with others insulting him.
Has anyone on this bored acted like the Pastor, BJ, you and bob towards Obama? I don't recall anyone being personally insulting towards him. If anyone did, I think I would have remembered. I think that is just another liberal narrative. Any criticism of Obama was deemed racist or some other 'ist'.
There are others outside of this bored. Expand your horizons.
I know there are. You seem to disseminate everything you see. You don't seem to understand that the 1% of whackos on the right don't represent 99% of us. Neither does the MSM. And especially the left wing whacko sites you frequent.
The only outside source I ever see is hannity, apparently. Either that or he trolls this bored and echoes me.