WWTBAM Bored

Makes sense. I'm wondering what took so long.

Leonard Fournette and Christian McCaffrey to forego final bowl games.

It is disappointing as a fan, but given the risk/reward for playing that final bowl game, it is a no brainer for the players; all risk, no reward. It seems the NCAA should be able to allow each player some form of "reward" and paid insurance to cover a career limiting injuries sustained in such final games.

I need to go check my bowl picks now.

Coaches who take new jobs have been doing the same thing for years, leaving their old teams in the lurch.

Houston's Tom Herman signs with Texas. Three weeks later, his old team, which at one time was bandied about for a New Year's bowl game, gets clobbered in the Las Vegas Bowl by San Diego State.

silverscreenselect wrote:Coaches who take new jobs have been doing the same thing for years, leaving their old teams in the lurch.

Houston's Tom Herman signs with Texas. Three weeks later, his old team, which at one time was bandied about for a New Year's bowl game, gets clobbered in the Las Vegas Bowl by San Diego State.

Completely different. The coaches lose nothing, risk nothing, by staying for the bowl game.

BackInTex wrote:

silverscreenselect wrote:Coaches who take new jobs have been doing the same thing for years, leaving their old teams in the lurch.

Houston's Tom Herman signs with Texas. Three weeks later, his old team, which at one time was bandied about for a New Year's bowl game, gets clobbered in the Las Vegas Bowl by San Diego State.

Completely different. The coaches lose nothing, risk nothing, by staying for the bowl game.

What the coaches would lose by staying for the bowl game is valuable recruiting time (as well as time putting a staff together). A lot of highly rated high school prospects make up their minds around now, and a major school can't wait until January for its new coach to get actively involved in recruiting. In the pros, it's different; there's no real loss in filling a vacancy in January because free agency and the draft don't occur for months.

silverscreenselect wrote:

BackInTex wrote:

silverscreenselect wrote:Coaches who take new jobs have been doing the same thing for years, leaving their old teams in the lurch.

Houston's Tom Herman signs with Texas. Three weeks later, his old team, which at one time was bandied about for a New Year's bowl game, gets clobbered in the Las Vegas Bowl by San Diego State.

Completely different. The coaches lose nothing, risk nothing, by staying for the bowl game.

What the coaches would lose by staying for the bowl game is valuable recruiting time (as well as time putting a staff together). A lot of highly rated high school prospects make up their minds around now, and a major school can't wait until January for its new coach to get actively involved in recruiting. In the pros, it's different; there's no real loss in filling a vacancy in January because free agency and the draft don't occur for months.

I disagree with the recruiting comment. You're telling me that 82 coaches are at a disadvantage because they are having to coach a bowl game?

Getting to work on building a staff makes sense.