WWTBAM Bored

Normally I refer to the Democratic nominee as Secretary Clinton. But in this video, I think Hillary is correct.



I wish she'd show this side of herself more often. I found her treatment of the questioner quite moving. --Bob

Bob78164 wrote:Normally I refer to the Democratic nominee as Secretary Clinton. But in this video, I think Hillary is correct.



I wish she'd show this side of herself more often. I found her treatment of the questioner quite moving. --Bob

You no doubt want everyone to believe this was a completely random selection of an audience person and Clinton had no idea what the question would be, and her response was unscripted and from the heart. Truthfully, do you actually believe it?

I don't.

BackInTex wrote:

Bob78164 wrote:Normally I refer to the Democratic nominee as Secretary Clinton. But in this video, I think Hillary is correct.



I wish she'd show this side of herself more often. I found her treatment of the questioner quite moving. --Bob

You no doubt want everyone to believe this was a completely random selection of an audience person and Clinton had no idea what the question would be, and her response was unscripted and from the heart. Truthfully, do you actually believe it?

I don't.

All your video shows is that the girl has acting experience and that she's the daughter of a state Democratic office-holder. No evidence that the response was scripted. --Bob

Bob78164 wrote:

BackInTex wrote:

Bob78164 wrote:Normally I refer to the Democratic nominee as Secretary Clinton. But in this video, I think Hillary is correct.



I wish she'd show this side of herself more often. I found her treatment of the questioner quite moving. --Bob

You no doubt want everyone to believe this was a completely random selection of an audience person and Clinton had no idea what the question would be, and her response was unscripted and from the heart. Truthfully, do you actually believe it?

I don't.

All your video shows is that the girl has acting experience and that she's the daughter of a state Democratic office-holder. No evidence that the response was scripted. --Bob

ROTFL!

tlynn78 wrote:

Bob78164 wrote:All your video shows is that the girl has acting experience and that she's the daughter of a state Democratic office-holder. No evidence that the response was scripted. --Bob

ROTFL!

I'm shocked, shocked! that the daughter of an office-holder would be interested in such an event, or that someone with acting experience would have the gumption to ask a question in a public forum. Next you'll be telling me that many of the players on Millionaire have acting experience.

Seriously, do you really think Hillary is that good an actor? --Bob

Bob78164 wrote:

tlynn78 wrote:

Bob78164 wrote:All your video shows is that the girl has acting experience and that she's the daughter of a state Democratic office-holder. No evidence that the response was scripted. --Bob

ROTFL!

I'm shocked, shocked! that the daughter of an office-holder would be interested in such an event, or that someone with acting experience would have the gumption to ask a question in a public forum. Next you'll be telling me that many of the players on Millionaire have acting experience.

Seriously, do you really think Hillary is that good an actor? --Bob

No she is not a good actor. She does not remotely seem like she was putting any thought into what the girl was asking and how to answer the question. Why? She already knew both.

And the girl was well rehearsed as well, to how the dialog would go.

Watch when Hillary asks "Can you tell me a little bit more about why that's on your mind?" The actor immediately begins to respond, no hesitation, and there is not a single pause for reflection, not a single, "um", no eye movement indicating a thought process. It was all memorized and rehearsed. And as the girl finishes that line, she puts her hand up ready for Clinton to grab it and pull her near before Hillary reaches our to her.

And those are just my observations from watching it now, with some suspicion. Not something I pulled off a website.

Evidence is only useful if you choose not to ignore it.

BackInTex wrote:No she is not a good actor. She does not remotely seem like she was putting any thought into what the girl was asking and how to answer the question. Why? She already knew both.

And the girl was well rehearsed as well, to how the dialog would go.

Watch when Hillary asks "Can you tell me a little bit more about why that's on your mind?" The actor immediately begins to respond, no hesitation, and there is not a single pause for reflection, not a single, "um", no eye movement indicating a thought process. It was all memorized and rehearsed. And as the girl finishes that line, she puts her hand up ready for Clinton to grab it and pull her near before Hillary reaches our to her.

And those are just my observations from watching it now, with some suspicion. Not something I pulled off a website.

Evidence is only useful if you choose not to ignore it.

I think you're seeing things that aren't there. I also think that Occam's Razor is a more reliable guide here. She's a human being (and a mother and grandmother), she saw a young girl in some distress, and she moved to comfort her.

Why is it so hard to give Hillary credit for being a human being? --Bob

And also, the actor, after completing her question, acts like she is going to sit down, but anticipating Clinton's follow up, she begins to stand back up before Clinton begins speaking her follow up.

Timing is everything in illusions. Instead of acting coaches, perhaps they should have consulted Penn & Teller.

Bob78164 wrote: Why is it so hard to give Hillary credit for being a human being? --Bob

Evidence, to the contrary.

I never thought I'd have wished Jeb Bush had been the republican nominee. I think even Lindsay Graham could beat Hillary. Anyone who could speak in semi-coherent sentences could win, but they nominate the Donald, who has even more negatives than Hillary, which is hard to do.

Of course this was staged. How much more evidence do you need to realize she is as crooked as Trump says she is, and that the MSM is protecting her. ABC reports that 'there were more wikileaks today, but ABC news can't verify their authenticity' (So they don't report them). But ANYBODY who claims Trump harassed them 10 years ago gets a half hour interview.

PS, what I would think of doing if I were Trump is to get several women to claim some real bad things Trump did to them to see if the MSM would pick them up, then reveal they made it up to show how slimely the media really is.

flockofseagulls104 wrote:I never thought I'd have wished Jeb Bush had been the republican nominee. I think even Lindsay Graham could beat Hillary. Anyone who could speak in semi-coherent sentences could win, but they nominate the Donald, who has even more negatives than Hillary, which is hard to do.

Of course this was staged. How much more evidence do you need to realize she is as crooked as Trump says she is, and that the MSM is protecting her. ABC reports that 'there were more wikileaks today, but ABC news can't verify their authenticity' (So they don't report them). But ANYBODY who claims Trump harassed them 10 years ago gets a half hour interview.

PS, what I would think of doing if I were Trump is to get several women to claim some real bad things Trump did to them to see if the MSM would pick them up, then reveal they made it up to show how slimely the media really is.

I'd comment on that but I believe in, “Never interfere with your enemy when he is making a mistake.”

Bob78164 wrote:

tlynn78 wrote:

Bob78164 wrote:All your video shows is that the girl has acting experience and that she's the daughter of a state Democratic office-holder. No evidence that the response was scripted. --Bob

ROTFL!

I'm shocked, shocked! that the daughter of an office-holder would be interested in such an event, or that someone with acting experience would have the gumption to ask a question in a public forum. Next you'll be telling me that many of the players on Millionaire have acting experience.

Seriously, do you really think Hillary is that good an actor? --Bob

Well I was on The FBI Files...

BackInTex wrote: No she is not a good actor.

For once I agree with BiT.

Donald Trump would have been much more at ease hugging a 15-year-old girl.

silverscreenselect wrote:

BackInTex wrote: No she is not a good actor.

For once I agree with BiT.

Donald Trump would have been much more at ease hugging a 15-year-old girl.

But the 15 year old girl would not have been at ease hugging him.

Sen. Leach's daughter: Not a Clinton 'plant' at Haverford event

I've known Daylin Leach for 12 years. He's my state senator, and before that he was my state assemblyman. He would never have his daughter ask a staged question and then lie about it.