Attack In Nice: '60 Dead' As Truck Hits Crowd

The forum for general posting. Come join the madness. :)
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Bob Juch
Posts: 27132
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
Contact:

Attack In Nice: '60 Dead' As Truck Hits Crowd

#1 Post by Bob Juch » Thu Jul 14, 2016 4:36 pm

At least 60 people are reported to have been killed after a truck ploughed into a crowd in an apparent attack in the French city of Nice.

A further 100 people have been injured, according to French television station BFM TV.

One eyewitness reported seeing the driver slam the lorry into revellers celebrating Bastille Day on the city's famous Promenade des Anglais.

He then emerged from the vehicle and started shooting, local resident Wassim Bouhlel told news agency AP.

"There was carnage on the road," he said. "Bodies everywhere."

Local newspaper Le Parisien is reporting that shots were exchanged with police.

"According to our information the driver of the lorry has been killed. A possible accomplice fled the scene," the newspaper said.
http://www.lbc.co.uk/attack-in-nice-60- ... owd-133806
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)

Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.

Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.

User avatar
jarnon
Posts: 7003
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 9:52 pm
Location: Merion, Pa.

Re: Attack In Nice: '60 Dead' As Truck Hits Crowd

#2 Post by jarnon » Thu Jul 14, 2016 6:41 pm

The White House has called this "a horrific terrorist attack." As we know, Obama is very careful with words like "terrorist."

Vive la France.
Слава Україні!

User avatar
Jeemie
Posts: 7303
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:35 pm
Location: City of Champions Once More (Well, in spirit)!!!!

Re: Attack In Nice: '60 Dead' As Truck Hits Crowd

#3 Post by Jeemie » Thu Jul 14, 2016 6:53 pm

And yet just this weekend in Warsaw, NATO declared Russia a bigger threat to European security than ISIS.

Russia, which has done nothing but endure ever-more times where the West breaks the promises made to it when the Cold War ended.

So NATO sends 4,000 troops to the Baltic (sorry- not send- "rotate"- since another one of those pesky promises- the one where we promised never to station troops further east than Germany- gets in the way).

4,000 troops- too small a number to either credibly attack nor defend against attack- but large enough to provide a geopolitical cattle prod to get a reaction from Russia so NATO can say "See? Russia's a MENACE!!"

I guess you don't need heavy weapons, tanks, battleships, and nukes to take out ISIS...so not enough profits to keep the NATO fat cats in the life of luxury to which they are used.
1979 City of Champions 2009

User avatar
BackInTex
Posts: 13737
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:43 pm
Location: In Texas of course!

Re: Attack In Nice: '60 Dead' As Truck Hits Crowd

#4 Post by BackInTex » Thu Jul 14, 2016 7:23 pm

jarnon wrote:The White House has called this "a horrific terrorist attack." As we know, Obama is very careful with words like "terrorist."

Vive la France.
Who does he think did it? Where does he think they came from? How does he think they got into France?

What is his policy here regarding immigration?
..what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? let them take arms.
~~ Thomas Jefferson

War is where the government tells you who the bad guy is.
Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
-- Benjamin Franklin (maybe)

User avatar
themanintheseersuckersuit
Posts: 7635
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:37 pm
Location: South Carolina

Re: Attack In Nice: '60 Dead' As Truck Hits Crowd

#5 Post by themanintheseersuckersuit » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:02 pm

Truck hits crowd
Suitguy is not bitter.

feels he represents the many educated and rational onlookers who believe that the hysterical denouncement of lay scepticism is both unwarranted and counter-productive

The problem, then, is that such calls do not address an opposition audience so much as they signal virtue. They talk past those who need convincing. They ignore actual facts and counterargument. And they are irreparably smug.

Post Reply