2nd season? If so...
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2016 7:16 pm
when are they taping?
Hope all of you are well...
Greg
Hope all of you are well...
Greg
Surprised they weren't a little more careful about when they aired that. If it was me, I would have flagged that for an earlier airing.earendel wrote:Interesting side note - on today's show one of the contestants was a woman who was expecting a baby. Chris congratulated her and asked when, and she said "January 2016". She wasn't showing, so she couldn't have been too far along, meaning that the show was probably taped in June or July.
It seems to me that the shows they're airing after the two weeks of reruns have the worst contestants. Maybe it's just me.K.P. wrote:Surprised they weren't a little more careful about when they aired that. If it was me, I would have flagged that for an earlier airing.earendel wrote:Interesting side note - on today's show one of the contestants was a woman who was expecting a baby. Chris congratulated her and asked when, and she said "January 2016". She wasn't showing, so she couldn't have been too far along, meaning that the show was probably taped in June or July.
Especially that first contestant last Monday, right?Bob Juch wrote: It seems to me that the shows they're airing after the two weeks of reruns have the worst contestants. Maybe it's just me.
SPOILER ALERT:K.P. wrote:Especially that first contestant last Monday, right?Bob Juch wrote: It seems to me that the shows they're airing after the two weeks of reruns have the worst contestants. Maybe it's just me.
I was certainly taken aback by the three llamas last week, but I showed the questions to my friends, who are not regular Millionaire viewers, and they got them wrong as well. They didn't realize the questions had clues written in to them, like the "6 hours" clue for "Sext," or the "QUESTION WRITTEN IN ALL CAPS." One of those friends is a Jeopardy enthusiast, and I can attest to his intelligence.
My mistake, they began taping the last week in June; I re-entered the contestant pool at the end of May.triviawayne wrote:If that's the case; last year taping began the last week in May. I wouldn't think his schedule for the bachelor would be any different this year.
That said, seems like they might be cutting it close getting the information out there.
Really?? This is going off-topic a bit, but that's the fourth llama in the last five episodes (not counting the double-runs).earendel wrote:SPOILER ALERT:K.P. wrote:Especially that first contestant last Monday, right?Bob Juch wrote: It seems to me that the shows they're airing after the two weeks of reruns have the worst contestants. Maybe it's just me.
I was certainly taken aback by the three llamas last week, but I showed the questions to my friends, who are not regular Millionaire viewers, and they got them wrong as well. They didn't realize the questions had clues written in to them, like the "6 hours" clue for "Sext," or the "QUESTION WRITTEN IN ALL CAPS." One of those friends is a Jeopardy enthusiast, and I can attest to his intelligence.Spoiler
There was another llama on today's show.
I could be wrong, but I hope I'm not. I don't think the $1,000 consolation was an accident. It's not like it's buried in the footnotes, it's very prominent. There's even a table of what you win if you get a question right vs. getting it wrong. We all had quite a laugh in the green room over the first question reading "Get it right: $500. Get it wrong: $1,000".Brit Canuck wrote: I know they still have the $1K consolation prize in play this season, possibly because I remember that the rules on the official site weren't updated before tapings of the current season started last summer. But if that goes away next season, then next season could be a Llamacre (llama massacre), and maybe the last for SyndieBAM if no one wins the $1M and/or Disney decides not to renew their license.
But do TPTB give a damn? It doesn't seem like it when it's time to cast their contestants.K.P. wrote:I believe the $1,000 is going to, and should, stay in place because getting rid of it would really discourage anybody who doesn't live within 100 miles of Stamford from trying out.
When they spoke to us in the green room, they sure made it sound like they're trying to get more representation from the rest of the country. Remember that viewers are more likely to tune in if they hear a local is going to be on.MarleysGh0st wrote:But do TPTB give a damn? It doesn't seem like it when it's time to cast their contestants.K.P. wrote:I believe the $1,000 is going to, and should, stay in place because getting rid of it would really discourage anybody who doesn't live within 100 miles of Stamford from trying out.
APs are good at making it sound good.K.P. wrote:When they spoke to us in the green room, they sure made it sound like they're trying to get more representation from the rest of the country.
I believe it. Do they?K.P. wrote:Remember that viewers are more likely to tune in if they hear a local is going to be on.
Nothing now. They'll cast them if they try out. Maybe I'm missing your point?MarleysGh0st wrote: So, they audition lots of folks who pass the test from "Elsewhere". What's stopping TPTB from casting them on the show?
I'd say so. Of course, I'm guessing, since I'm not privy to the viewership data.I believe it. Do they?
If they try out?K.P. wrote:Nothing now. They'll cast them if they try out. Maybe I'm missing your point?MarleysGh0st wrote: So, they audition lots of folks who pass the test from "Elsewhere". What's stopping TPTB from casting them on the show?
Absolutely true. I'm meerly proposing that if the $1000 consolation went away, that number of auditioners would go down. I know I wouldn't have done it if $0 was a possibility. Flight and hotel cost me about $1100 for my trip.MarleysGh0st wrote: I'm referring to all of the past years of the show and asserting that there have been many people from outside the NYC area who have passed the written test (pointing to myself as an example) but have not been invited onto the show.
Certainly not denying that. The fact that New York has so many people, especially aspiring actors, will naturally lend itself to New York having more contestants with desirable qualities.And why is that? Perhaps because--while it it easy for an AP to say that they want more contestants from Elsewhere--that factor loses out to the all the other factors like demographics and personality and quirky stories that go into making a "great" contestant in their minds. So if they really, really want more contestants from Elsewhere, they have to rebalance those factors to make it so.
I wonder how many in the audience are extras.K.P. wrote: That'd be a stat I'd love to see. How many contestants per season have a SAG card?