The end of the reign of The Mad Hatter?
Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2015 3:08 pm
Or, to put it another way, Les is no more?
As a fan of college FB, especially in the SEC, I've been gobsnockered since the rumor mill started up about LSU head football coach Les Miles' potential ouster. (OTOH, I was surprised to hear during the Bama-LSU game that Bama had won four straight -- this series is often a tossup in any given year, and usually no more that two-game streaks have occurred. Of course, not it's a five game streak.)
I mean, the guy's had a pretty good record, one national championship, a couple of SEC championships, and a winning record every year. However, after reading behind the lines, LSU ended up 4-4 in the SEC last year, and is currently 4-3 with one game left. They started the season with seven wins (should have been eight, but the opening weekend cupcake got left out in the rain, all the sweet cream icing flowing down, and was ultimately cancelled). They had a running back who looked to have a lock on the Heisman, and then then hit a brick wall in Tuscaloosa, and have lost three in a row.
The other surprising issue is that the cost to LSU to get rid of him would be $17 million -- $15 mill to him over eight years, $2 mill to his assistants paid over the next six months. Not something to take lightly, even with all the ESPN and CBS money going to the league. But whoever has decided that he's on the @#$) list has said "that's not a problem."
I guess the real problem is they are in a division where three schools (LSU, Auburn, and Bama) have legit aspirations for a conference or even a national championship at the start of each season, and four other teams who think they can get into the fray as well. Only one team ends up on top, and after awhile some big alum(s) get upset and want to make a change.
I know it's a business, but it amazes me how fast the worm can turn.
As a fan of college FB, especially in the SEC, I've been gobsnockered since the rumor mill started up about LSU head football coach Les Miles' potential ouster. (OTOH, I was surprised to hear during the Bama-LSU game that Bama had won four straight -- this series is often a tossup in any given year, and usually no more that two-game streaks have occurred. Of course, not it's a five game streak.)
I mean, the guy's had a pretty good record, one national championship, a couple of SEC championships, and a winning record every year. However, after reading behind the lines, LSU ended up 4-4 in the SEC last year, and is currently 4-3 with one game left. They started the season with seven wins (should have been eight, but the opening weekend cupcake got left out in the rain, all the sweet cream icing flowing down, and was ultimately cancelled). They had a running back who looked to have a lock on the Heisman, and then then hit a brick wall in Tuscaloosa, and have lost three in a row.
The other surprising issue is that the cost to LSU to get rid of him would be $17 million -- $15 mill to him over eight years, $2 mill to his assistants paid over the next six months. Not something to take lightly, even with all the ESPN and CBS money going to the league. But whoever has decided that he's on the @#$) list has said "that's not a problem."
I guess the real problem is they are in a division where three schools (LSU, Auburn, and Bama) have legit aspirations for a conference or even a national championship at the start of each season, and four other teams who think they can get into the fray as well. Only one team ends up on top, and after awhile some big alum(s) get upset and want to make a change.
I know it's a business, but it amazes me how fast the worm can turn.