Page 1 of 1

Screaming NOOOOOOOOO!!! at my TV set.

Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2015 10:20 am
by rayxtwo
Once last night after the Cardinals game and two more times today. You'll find out after you watch today's show.

Ray

Re: Screaming NOOOOOOOOO!!! at my TV set.

Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2015 11:11 am
by Bob Juch
I do that almost every weekday. :(

Re: Screaming NOOOOOOOOO!!! at my TV set.

Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2015 11:30 am
by SportsFan68
Show starts now. I'm sure Nooooooooooooooooooooooos and Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaarghs are soon forthcoming.

Re: Screaming NOOOOOOOOO!!! at my TV set.

Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2015 11:39 am
by SportsFan68
No Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooos yet, and lunch invite just came up.

You're on your own, Jess.

Re: Screaming NOOOOOOOOO!!! at my TV set.

Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2015 10:11 am
by ghostjmf
I guess I'll wait for the transcripts to elaborate, but yes, I screamed "Noooooo!!!!". Or actually, muttered "I can't believe this".

Re: Screaming NOOOOOOOOO!!! at my TV set.

Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2015 10:15 am
by earendel
So was this guy the first actual llama of the season (went home with no money)?

Re: Screaming NOOOOOOOOO!!! at my TV set.

Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2015 10:16 am
by earendel
ghostjmf wrote:I guess I'll wait for the transcripts to elaborate, but yes, I screamed "Noooooo!!!!". Or actually, muttered "I can't believe this".
I don't think we have a transcriptionist for that day.

Re: Screaming NOOOOOOOOO!!! at my TV set.

Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2015 10:39 am
by Bob Juch
earendel wrote:So was this guy the first actual llama of the season (went home with no money)?
I remember one $0 flame-out but it was on a later question. This was the first true llama.

Re: Screaming NOOOOOOOOO!!! at my TV set.

Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2015 11:49 am
by jarnon
earendel wrote:
ghostjmf wrote:I guess I'll wait for the transcripts to elaborate, but yes, I screamed "Noooooo!!!!". Or actually, muttered "I can't believe this".
I don't think we have a transcriptionist for that day.
If we're short on transcribers, want me to try my hand at it?

Re: Screaming NOOOOOOOOO!!! at my TV set.

Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2015 11:55 am
by Bob78164
jarnon wrote:
earendel wrote:
ghostjmf wrote:I guess I'll wait for the transcripts to elaborate, but yes, I screamed "Noooooo!!!!". Or actually, muttered "I can't believe this".
I don't think we have a transcriptionist for that day.
If we're short on transcribers, want me to try my hand at it?
Go for it! --Bob

Re: Screaming NOOOOOOOOO!!! at my TV set.

Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2015 1:48 pm
by TheConfessor
[/quote]Go for it! --Bob[/quote]
Most WWTBAM episodes have a pretty good transcript available on this site (along with details of several other game shows). For filling our missing gaps, this could be a good resource, at least as a starting point. Today's transcript is already posted.
http://gskingdom.blogspot.com/2015/10/m ... 01915.html

I can't vouch for the accuracy or quality of the transcripts there. For example, this question makes no sense, and I think there may be two typos or sloppy errors.

2. According to the Pabst Brewing Co., surprisingly, which of its products was actually NOT named for a receiver, but instead for an NFL player?

A: Lone Star
B: Colt 45
C: Old Milwaukee
D: Schlitz

Colt 45- $

The only way this would make sense to me is if "receiver" should be "revolver" and "NFL" should be "MLB".

Re: Screaming NOOOOOOOOO!!! at my TV set.

Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2015 1:57 pm
by Bob78164
TheConfessor wrote:
Bob78164 wrote:Go for it! --Bob
Most WWTBAM episodes have a pretty good transcript available on this site (along with details of several other game shows). For filling our missing gaps, this could be a good resource, at least as a starting point. Today's transcript is already posted.
http://gskingdom.blogspot.com/2015/10/m ... 01915.html

I can't vouch for the accuracy or quality of the transcripts there. For example, this question makes no sense, and I think there may be two typos or sloppy errors.

2. According to the Pabst Brewing Co., surprisingly, which of its products was actually NOT named for a receiver, but instead for an NFL player?

A: Lone Star
B: Colt 45
C: Old Milwaukee
D: Schlitz

Colt 45- $

The only way this would make sense to me is if "receiver" should be "revolver" and "NFL" should be "MLB".
And "team" instead of "player." --Bob

Re: Screaming NOOOOOOOOO!!! at my TV set.

Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2015 2:18 pm
by jarnon
TheConfessor wrote:2. According to the Pabst Brewing Co., surprisingly, which of its products was actually NOT named for a receiver, but instead for an NFL player?

A: Lone Star
B: Colt 45
C: Old Milwaukee
D: Schlitz

Colt 45- $

The only way this would make sense to me is if "receiver" should be "revolver" and "NFL" should be "MLB".
Pabst Brewing Co. wrote:Introduced in 1963 by the Baltimore, Maryland-based National Brewing Company, Colt 45 was named in honor of running back Jerry Hill, who was #45 on the 1963 Baltimore Colts football team.

Re: Screaming NOOOOOOOOO!!! at my TV set.

Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2015 7:40 pm
by TheConfessor
jarnon wrote:
TheConfessor wrote:2. According to the Pabst Brewing Co., surprisingly, which of its products was actually NOT named for a receiver, but instead for an NFL player?

A: Lone Star
B: Colt 45
C: Old Milwaukee
D: Schlitz

Colt 45- $

The only way this would make sense to me is if "receiver" should be "revolver" and "NFL" should be "MLB".
Pabst Brewing Co. wrote:Introduced in 1963 by the Baltimore, Maryland-based National Brewing Company, Colt 45 was named in honor of running back Jerry Hill, who was #45 on the 1963 Baltimore Colts football team.
Thanks for the clarification. So I guess there is only one typo.

Despite the claim from Pabst, Jerry Hill himself is not so sure. Here's his quote:
Jerry Hill wrote:"I kept a few cans, just for kicks," he said. "Rumor was that they named it after me. If they did, I sure never got any royalties."
http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2012-1 ... eeb-ewbank