So is next year's Super Bowl...
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2015 12:42 pm
...going to be just Super Bowl L? Probably not; they'll use Super Bowl 50.
But will the next year be Super Bowl LI?
But will the next year be Super Bowl LI?
You might want to think about a memory upgrade, Bob.Bob Juch wrote:...going to be just Super Bowl L? Probably not; they'll use Super Bowl 50.
But will the next year be Super Bowl LI?
I don't know... I think this years Super Bowl is a LI too.Bob Juch wrote:...going to be just Super Bowl L? Probably not; they'll use Super Bowl 50.
But will the next year be Super Bowl LI?
Even I remember that post string!mrkelley23 wrote:You might want to think about a memory upgrade, Bob.Bob Juch wrote:...going to be just Super Bowl L? Probably not; they'll use Super Bowl 50.
But will the next year be Super Bowl LI?
Oh, not for your computer, though.
My memory and Swiss cheese have a lot in common nowadays.mrkelley23 wrote:You might want to think about a memory upgrade, Bob.Bob Juch wrote:...going to be just Super Bowl L? Probably not; they'll use Super Bowl 50.
But will the next year be Super Bowl LI?
Oh, not for your computer, though.

Jeemie wrote:
The Roman Numerals are back for Super Bowl LI, however.
They were seriously worried about the negative impact of calling it Super Bowl L.
Seriously.
It's actually 42 miles away, in Santa Clara.Liberace wrote:Jeemie wrote:
The Roman Numerals are back for Super Bowl LI, however.
They were seriously worried about the negative impact of calling it Super Bowl L.
Seriously.
As opposed to the negative impact of hosting it in San Francisco....
Yes, ad even says so, "San Francisco Bay Area", like they they haven't actually finalized the details, just know its going to be in the general vicinity. Guess the marketing folks decided Santa Clara doesn't have the same draw. What are they worried about, not selling all the tickets?TheConfessor wrote:It's actually 42 miles away, in Santa Clara.Liberace wrote:Jeemie wrote:
The Roman Numerals are back for Super Bowl LI, however.
They were seriously worried about the negative impact of calling it Super Bowl L.
Seriously.
As opposed to the negative impact of hosting it in San Francisco....
BackInTex wrote:Yes, ad even says so, "San Francisco Bay Area", like they they haven't actually finalized the details, just know its going to be in the general vicinity. Guess the marketing folks decided Santa Clara doesn't have the same draw. What are they worried about, not selling all the tickets?TheConfessor wrote:It's actually 42 miles away, in Santa Clara.Liberace wrote:As opposed to the negative impact of hosting it in San Francisco....
Big cities insist on keeping a claim on things, regardless of little details like political boundaries.BackInTex wrote:Yes, ad even says so, "San Francisco Bay Area", like they they haven't actually finalized the details, just know its going to be in the general vicinity. Guess the marketing folks decided Santa Clara doesn't have the same draw. What are they worried about, not selling all the tickets?
Sometimes it works the other way. I don't think Waco ever asked to be credited for the Branch Davidians.MarleysGh0st wrote:Big cities insist on keeping a claim on things, regardless of little details like political boundaries.BackInTex wrote:Yes, ad even says so, "San Francisco Bay Area", like they they haven't actually finalized the details, just know its going to be in the general vicinity. Guess the marketing folks decided Santa Clara doesn't have the same draw. What are they worried about, not selling all the tickets?
Such as the Big Apple still claiming a couple teams that really play in New Jersey.