Page 1 of 1

So is next year's Super Bowl...

Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2015 12:42 pm
by Bob Juch
...going to be just Super Bowl L? Probably not; they'll use Super Bowl 50.

But will the next year be Super Bowl LI?

Re: So is next year's Super Bowl...

Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2015 2:31 pm
by mrkelley23
Bob Juch wrote:...going to be just Super Bowl L? Probably not; they'll use Super Bowl 50.

But will the next year be Super Bowl LI?
You might want to think about a memory upgrade, Bob.

Oh, not for your computer, though.

Re: So is next year's Super Bowl...

Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2015 3:24 pm
by rayxtwo
Bob Juch wrote:...going to be just Super Bowl L? Probably not; they'll use Super Bowl 50.

But will the next year be Super Bowl LI?
I don't know... I think this years Super Bowl is a LI too.

Ray

Re: So is next year's Super Bowl...

Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2015 6:48 pm
by christie1111
mrkelley23 wrote:
Bob Juch wrote:...going to be just Super Bowl L? Probably not; they'll use Super Bowl 50.

But will the next year be Super Bowl LI?
You might want to think about a memory upgrade, Bob.

Oh, not for your computer, though.
Even I remember that post string!

Re: So is next year's Super Bowl...

Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2015 8:52 am
by Bob Juch
mrkelley23 wrote:
Bob Juch wrote:...going to be just Super Bowl L? Probably not; they'll use Super Bowl 50.

But will the next year be Super Bowl LI?
You might want to think about a memory upgrade, Bob.

Oh, not for your computer, though.
My memory and Swiss cheese have a lot in common nowadays.

Re: So is next year's Super Bowl...

Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2015 10:14 am
by Jeemie
Image

The Roman Numerals are back for Super Bowl LI, however.

They were seriously worried about the negative impact of calling it Super Bowl L.

Seriously.

Re: So is next year's Super Bowl...

Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2015 10:54 am
by Liberace
Jeemie wrote:Image

The Roman Numerals are back for Super Bowl LI, however.

They were seriously worried about the negative impact of calling it Super Bowl L.

Seriously.

As opposed to the negative impact of hosting it in San Francisco....

Re: So is next year's Super Bowl...

Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2015 1:32 am
by TheConfessor
Liberace wrote:
Jeemie wrote:Image

The Roman Numerals are back for Super Bowl LI, however.

They were seriously worried about the negative impact of calling it Super Bowl L.

Seriously.

As opposed to the negative impact of hosting it in San Francisco....
It's actually 42 miles away, in Santa Clara.

Re: So is next year's Super Bowl...

Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2015 7:26 am
by BackInTex
TheConfessor wrote:
Liberace wrote:
Jeemie wrote:Image

The Roman Numerals are back for Super Bowl LI, however.

They were seriously worried about the negative impact of calling it Super Bowl L.

Seriously.

As opposed to the negative impact of hosting it in San Francisco....
It's actually 42 miles away, in Santa Clara.
Yes, ad even says so, "San Francisco Bay Area", like they they haven't actually finalized the details, just know its going to be in the general vicinity. Guess the marketing folks decided Santa Clara doesn't have the same draw. What are they worried about, not selling all the tickets?

Re: So is next year's Super Bowl...

Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2015 7:31 am
by littlebeast13
BackInTex wrote:
TheConfessor wrote:
Liberace wrote:As opposed to the negative impact of hosting it in San Francisco....
It's actually 42 miles away, in Santa Clara.
Yes, ad even says so, "San Francisco Bay Area", like they they haven't actually finalized the details, just know its going to be in the general vicinity. Guess the marketing folks decided Santa Clara doesn't have the same draw. What are they worried about, not selling all the tickets?

They coulda stole a page from Arte Moreno and called it the San Francisco Super Bowl of Santa Clara....

lb13

Re: So is next year's Super Bowl...

Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2015 8:41 am
by Jeemie
I wonder if they advertised it as the San Francisco Bay area back for Super Bowl XIX...which was at Stanford Stadium in Palo Alto.

49ers (XIX- 32 miles from Candlestick Park) and Rams (XIV- Rose Bowl, 14 miles from LA Coliseum) still the two teams that came the closest to participating in a Super Bowl in their home venue.

Re: So is next year's Super Bowl...

Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2015 12:14 pm
by Bob Juch
I have an idea to rile up the whack jobs...

Start a protest against using Arabic numerals.

:P

Re: So is next year's Super Bowl...

Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2015 4:01 pm
by MarleysGh0st
BackInTex wrote:Yes, ad even says so, "San Francisco Bay Area", like they they haven't actually finalized the details, just know its going to be in the general vicinity. Guess the marketing folks decided Santa Clara doesn't have the same draw. What are they worried about, not selling all the tickets?
Big cities insist on keeping a claim on things, regardless of little details like political boundaries.

Such as the Big Apple still claiming a couple teams that really play in New Jersey.

Re: So is next year's Super Bowl...

Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2015 5:54 pm
by TheConfessor
MarleysGh0st wrote:
BackInTex wrote:Yes, ad even says so, "San Francisco Bay Area", like they they haven't actually finalized the details, just know its going to be in the general vicinity. Guess the marketing folks decided Santa Clara doesn't have the same draw. What are they worried about, not selling all the tickets?
Big cities insist on keeping a claim on things, regardless of little details like political boundaries.

Such as the Big Apple still claiming a couple teams that really play in New Jersey.
Sometimes it works the other way. I don't think Waco ever asked to be credited for the Branch Davidians.