Page 1 of 1
Affirmative action at the highest level
Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2014 1:35 pm
by BackInTex
Of course its the elephant in the room no one (on the left) talks about, but then it slips out.
"shocking" media bias
Of course, race didn't exempt Herman Cain, or Alan West, or Clarence Thomas.
Re: Affirmative action at the highest level
Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2014 1:42 pm
by Bob Juch
BackInTex wrote:Of course its the elephant in the room no one (on the left) talks about, but then it slips out.
"shocking" media bias
Of course, race didn't exempt Herman Cain, or Alan West, or Clarence Thomas.
How in any way is that affirmative action?
Also, what the reporter said was, "You wonder how much you should criticize the President because he's black but you have to do it,' which means he's not giving Obama a pass at all.
Re: Affirmative action at the highest level
Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2014 2:57 pm
by BackInTex
Bob Juch wrote:BackInTex wrote:Of course its the elephant in the room no one (on the left) talks about, but then it slips out.
"shocking" media bias
Of course, race didn't exempt Herman Cain, or Alan West, or Clarence Thomas.
How in any way is that affirmative action?
Also, what the reporter said was, "You wonder how much you should criticize the President because he's black but you have to do it,' which means he's not giving Obama a pass at all.
"you have to do it" means you have to critisize. But "how much" is certainly throttled back because of his race.
Affirmative action because the lack of critisizm started the day he showed up to give the keynote address at the 2004 convention. He was held less accountable and to a lesser standard so he could get elected.
Its not me saying it, its the black CNN reporter saying it.
Re: Affirmative action at the highest level
Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2014 3:09 pm
by Bob Juch
BackInTex wrote:Bob Juch wrote:BackInTex wrote:Of course its the elephant in the room no one (on the left) talks about, but then it slips out.
"shocking" media bias
Of course, race didn't exempt Herman Cain, or Alan West, or Clarence Thomas.
How in any way is that affirmative action?
Also, what the reporter said was, "You wonder how much you should criticize the President because he's black but you have to do it,' which means he's not giving Obama a pass at all.
"you have to do it" means you have to critisize. But "how much" is certainly throttled back because of his race.
Affirmative action because the lack of critisizm started the day he showed up to give the keynote address at the 2004 convention. He was held less accountable and to a lesser standard so he could get elected.
Its not me saying it, its the black CNN reporter saying it.
I'm beginning to think that you and all Republicans have a comprehension problem.
Re: Affirmative action at the highest level
Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2014 3:19 pm
by themanintheseersuckersuit
The soft bigotry of low expectations
Re: Affirmative action at the highest level
Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2014 3:32 pm
by jarnon
Bob Juch wrote:How in any way is that affirmative action?
I think BiT used "affirmative action" as a synonym for reverse discrimination, rather than its literal meaning (a program at some schools and businesses to compensate for previous discrimination).
Re: Affirmative action at the highest level
Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2014 3:44 pm
by BackInTex
Bob Juch wrote:I'm beginning to think that you and all Republicans have a comprehension problem.
That's understandable. Most people with psychosis think its the others who are crazy.