WWTBAM Bored

Prosecutor Told Mother Of Five Year Old Rape Victim ‘Boys Will Be Boys’ - See more at: http://aattp.org/prosecutor-told-mother ... 76v6t.dpuf

Bob Juch wrote:Prosecutor Told Mother Of Five Year Old Rape Victim ‘Boys Will Be Boys’ - See more at: http://aattp.org/prosecutor-told-mother ... 76v6t.dpuf

The Missoula County Democratic Party must be proud to have him. Maybe the people of Missoula would be better off voting for Republicans...

It is unusual for Americans Against the Tea Party to post anything critical of a Democrat.

TheCalvinator24 wrote:It is unusual for Americans Against the Tea Party to post anything critical of a Democrat.

But not unusual for them to not do their research.

BackInTex wrote:

TheCalvinator24 wrote:It is unusual for Americans Against the Tea Party to post anything critical of a Democrat.

But not unusual for them to not do their research.

They seem to have done their research for this article. The facts have been widely reported, in the local Missoula newspaper and the New York Daily News among other places. They didn't identify the prosecutor as a Republican or a Tea Party member.

Please provide me with the examples of the Americans Against the Tea Party failing to do research in enough of their articles so that you can fairly make a statement that it's "not unusual."

silverscreenselect wrote:

BackInTex wrote:

TheCalvinator24 wrote:It is unusual for Americans Against the Tea Party to post anything critical of a Democrat.

But not unusual for them to not do their research.

They seem to have done their research for this article. The facts have been widely reported, in the local Missoula newspaper and the New York Daily News among other places. They didn't identify the prosecutor as a Republican or a Tea Party member.

Please provide me with the examples of the Americans Against the Tea Party failing to do research in enough of their articles so that you can fairly make a statement that it's "not unusual."

Look at their home page. Look at their blogs. To use language you are familiar with, they are a 'hate group', pure and simple.

Here's one: Looking at their 'website' they continue to show the disgusting photo of Dale Robertson labeling him as the founder of the Texas Tea Party. (It was actually the Houston Tea party he was trying to slander). He was and is a fraud and a plant.
Go to their website and scroll down. Then read this.

http://ikeonic.blogspot.com/2010/01/epi ... -dale.html

No one that I know of that has anything to do with the Tea party could care less about ethnicity. We are about 3 things and 3 things only. Fiscal Responsibility, less federal government control of our lives and respect and adherence to the Constitution. PERIOD.

flockofseagulls104 wrote: Look at their home page. Look at their blogs. To use language you are familiar with, they are a 'hate group', pure and simple.

Here's one: Looking at their 'website' they continue to show the disgusting photo of Dale Robertson labeling him as the founder of the Texas Tea Party. (It was actually the Houston Tea party he was trying to slander). He was and is a fraud and a plant.
Go to their website and scroll down. Then read this.

http://ikeonic.blogspot.com/2010/01/epi ... -dale.html

No one that I know of that has anything to do with the Tea party could care less about ethnicity. We are about 3 things and 3 things only. Fiscal Responsibility, less federal government control of our lives and respect and adherence to the Constitution. PERIOD.

Is there an "official" list of people who are affiliated with the Tea Party and those who aren't? Because it sure sounds like this guy thinks he's affiliated with the Tea Party and organizations like C-Span and the Washington Times thought he was too when they sought him out as a spokesman.

According to your article, Robertson has a registered a number of Tea Party domains (I have a number of Silver Screen domains registered myself) and is in a dispute with other tea party groups. That doesn't make him any less of a tea partyer than your buddies Mourdock and Akin.

Also, admittedly the AATP's web site isn't theasiest to search, but I couldn't find any reference to Dale Robertson, especially on the home page, and when I googled it, I couldn't find any stories on their website referring to him. The stories that do refer to him say he is the founder of teaparty.org, which appears to be true since he registred the doman.

silverscreenselect wrote:

flockofseagulls104 wrote: Look at their home page. Look at their blogs. To use language you are familiar with, they are a 'hate group', pure and simple.

Here's one: Looking at their 'website' they continue to show the disgusting photo of Dale Robertson labeling him as the founder of the Texas Tea Party. (It was actually the Houston Tea party he was trying to slander). He was and is a fraud and a plant.
Go to their website and scroll down. Then read this.

http://ikeonic.blogspot.com/2010/01/epi ... -dale.html

No one that I know of that has anything to do with the Tea party could care less about ethnicity. We are about 3 things and 3 things only. Fiscal Responsibility, less federal government control of our lives and respect and adherence to the Constitution. PERIOD.

Is there an "official" list of people who are affiliated with the Tea Party and those who aren't? Because it sure sounds like this guy thinks he's affiliated with the Tea Party and organizations like C-Span and the Washington Times thought he was too when they sought him out as a spokesman.

According to your article, Robertson has a registered a number of Tea Party domains (I have a number of Silver Screen domains registered myself) and is in a dispute with other tea party groups. That doesn't make him any less of a tea partyer than your buddies Mourdock and Akin.

Also, admittedly the AATP's web site isn't theasiest to search, but I couldn't find any reference to Dale Robertson, especially on the home page, and when I googled it, I couldn't find any stories on their website referring to him. The stories that do refer to him say he is the founder of teaparty.org, which appears to be true since he registred the doman.

He has more in common with the Democratic party than he does with the Tea party movement. Scroll down on their website. They don't identify him by name, they just posted the disgusting photo labeled with "Founder to the Texas Tea party".

I have answered your challenge. If I cared to, I could provide hundreds more examples. But it isn't going to convince you.

Keep spreading your hate if it makes you feel better.

flockofseagulls104 wrote: Scroll down on their website. They don't identify him by name, they just posted the disgusting photo labeled with "Founder to the Texas Tea party".

I have answered your challenge. If I cared to, I could provide hundreds more examples. But it isn't going to convince you.

Keep spreading your hate if it makes you feel better.

Well, I did go to their site, and there's nothing on the front page about Dale Robertson. In fact, I was finally able to find their search function (it's not the easiest to find) and according to that, Dale Robertson isn't listed anywhere on their site

http://aattp.org/?s=dale+robertson

Since the Tea Party doesn't appear to have any official organizational structure or recognized hierarchy, you can't claim that one person or group doesn't "represent" the Tea Party because their views are different from yours. They could just as easily and just as correctly claim your views don't represent the Tea Party.

silverscreenselect wrote:

flockofseagulls104 wrote: Scroll down on their website. They don't identify him by name, they just posted the disgusting photo labeled with "Founder to the Texas Tea party".

I have answered your challenge. If I cared to, I could provide hundreds more examples. But it isn't going to convince you.

Keep spreading your hate if it makes you feel better.

Well, I did go to their site, and there's nothing on the front page about Dale Robertson. In fact, I was finally able to find their search function (it's not the easiest to find) and according to that, Dale Robertson isn't listed anywhere on their site

http://aattp.org/?s=dale+robertson

Since the Tea Party doesn't appear to have any official organizational structure or recognized hierarchy, you can't claim that one person or group doesn't "represent" the Tea Party because their views are different from yours. They could just as easily and just as correctly claim your views don't represent the Tea Party.

Oh, excuse me. Look at their facebook page.

Good argument there, SSS. I can find nothing wrong with your logic. Except for the fact that it's completely wrong, it makes perfect sense.

flockofseagulls104 wrote:

silverscreenselect wrote:

BackInTex wrote:
But not unusual for them to not do their research.

They seem to have done their research for this article. The facts have been widely reported, in the local Missoula newspaper and the New York Daily News among other places. They didn't identify the prosecutor as a Republican or a Tea Party member.

Please provide me with the examples of the Americans Against the Tea Party failing to do research in enough of their articles so that you can fairly make a statement that it's "not unusual."

Look at their home page. Look at their blogs. To use language you are familiar with, they are a 'hate group', pure and simple.

Here's one: Looking at their 'website' they continue to show the disgusting photo of Dale Robertson labeling him as the founder of the Texas Tea Party. (It was actually the Houston Tea party he was trying to slander). He was and is a fraud and a plant.
Go to their website and scroll down. Then read this.

http://ikeonic.blogspot.com/2010/01/epi ... -dale.html

No one that I know of that has anything to do with the Tea party could care less about ethnicity. We are about 3 things and 3 things only. Fiscal Responsibility, less federal government control of our lives and respect and adherence to the Constitution. PERIOD.

You'll have to give this one up at some point, Flock. Obviously you don't know them, but the Tea Partiers in this area are very clear about demanding more responsiveness from their federal elected officials (then shouting them down when they actually appear at Town Halls), about demanding the halt of earmarks and pork barrel projects (then screaming blue murder when their favorite projects are threatened), about less federal government control of our lives (then screaming blue murder about how government has to step in and interfere with reproductive freedom, even to extent of claiming that God must have intended it to happen when a rape results in pregnancy). These are Tea Partiers that I know, and while your claim that you don't know them is certainly true, your claim that they don't represent Tea Party positions because it is about three things only is patently false.

flockofseagulls104 wrote: Keep spreading your hate if it makes you feel better.

Why do you guys continue to respond to his obvious baiting?

He will keep doing it if your guys continue to post in his threads getting into arguments that just make him do it again.

Are we going to let parties be defined by the worst case associations? I'm fine with that as long as it goes both ways. Mind you, I don't think it reflective of any group but as long as we're trying to insult each other's party lets get it on.

christie1111 wrote:

flockofseagulls104 wrote: Keep spreading your hate if it makes you feel better.

Why do you guys continue to respond to his obvious baiting?

He will keep doing it if your guys continue to post in his threads getting into arguments that just make him do it again.

If I see or hear someone spewing bigoted, hateful words at or directed towards a black person or gay person, I will tell them how offensive it is and tell them they are jerks. I am doing the same thing to SSS, because what he, and those like him are doing just as offensive. And they shouldn't be able to get away with it. That goes for the whole &^&#^ed up I Hate the Tea party organization.

flockofseagulls104 wrote: Oh, excuse me. Look at their facebook page.

Good argument there, SSS. I can find nothing wrong with your logic. Except for the fact that it's completely wrong, it makes perfect sense.

I'm not trying to be difficult here because I really did want to see what you were looking at, but I'm not very Facebook-friendly and I found two Facebook pages, one labeled Americans against the Tea Party and the other "Americans against the Tea Party" (clever use of quotation marks there), and neither of them had a picture of Dale Robertson.

I'm assuming you're correct and I just haven't been able to find this particular site or get to the right spot on the page. However, aren't most of the posts on these pages done by people who like the site and not necessarily by the site owner? If so, it's possible that the comments might have been posted by someone else, not the AATTP itself (and a number of sites have a "no censorship" policy so they don't take down political comments with which they may disagree).

silverscreenselect wrote:

flockofseagulls104 wrote: Oh, excuse me. Look at their facebook page.

Good argument there, SSS. I can find nothing wrong with your logic. Except for the fact that it's completely wrong, it makes perfect sense.

I'm not trying to be difficult here because I really did want to see what you were looking at, but I'm not very Facebook-friendly and I found two Facebook pages, one labeled Americans against the Tea Party and the other "Americans against the Tea Party" (clever use of quotation marks there), and neither of them had a picture of Dale Robertson.

I'm assuming you're correct and I just haven't been able to find this particular site or get to the right spot on the page. However, aren't most of the posts on these pages done by people who like the site and not necessarily by the site owner? If so, it's possible that the comments might have been posted by someone else, not the AATTP itself (and a number of sites have a "no censorship" policy so they don't take down political comments with which they may disagree).

If I use the same logic you use, aren't the I Hate the Tea Party people just as liable as you hold the Tea Party for the hateful jerks that post bigoted epithets on their facebook page? It goes both ways, there SSS. And while you're on their facebook page, why not take a look take a look at some of the wonderful people the I Hate The Tea party attracts. I'll bet some of them have gotten elected to congress.

flockofseagulls104 wrote:

silverscreenselect wrote:

flockofseagulls104 wrote: Oh, excuse me. Look at their facebook page.

Good argument there, SSS. I can find nothing wrong with your logic. Except for the fact that it's completely wrong, it makes perfect sense.

I'm not trying to be difficult here because I really did want to see what you were looking at, but I'm not very Facebook-friendly and I found two Facebook pages, one labeled Americans against the Tea Party and the other "Americans against the Tea Party" (clever use of quotation marks there), and neither of them had a picture of Dale Robertson.

I'm assuming you're correct and I just haven't been able to find this particular site or get to the right spot on the page. However, aren't most of the posts on these pages done by people who like the site and not necessarily by the site owner? If so, it's possible that the comments might have been posted by someone else, not the AATTP itself (and a number of sites have a "no censorship" policy so they don't take down political comments with which they may disagree).

If I use the same logic you use, aren't the I Hate the Tea Party people just as liable as you hold the Tea Party for the hateful jerks that post bigoted epithets on their facebook page? It goes both ways, there SSS. And while you're on their facebook page, why not take a look take a look at some of the wonderful people the I Hate The Tea party attracts. I'll bet some of them have gotten elected to congress.

If I knew how to do it, I would post a picture of their facebook page. But every time I go there, my computer feels slimy. It creeps me out going there. I can just feel the hatred.

flockofseagulls104 wrote:

flockofseagulls104 wrote:

silverscreenselect wrote:
I'm not trying to be difficult here because I really did want to see what you were looking at, but I'm not very Facebook-friendly and I found two Facebook pages, one labeled Americans against the Tea Party and the other "Americans against the Tea Party" (clever use of quotation marks there), and neither of them had a picture of Dale Robertson.

I'm assuming you're correct and I just haven't been able to find this particular site or get to the right spot on the page. However, aren't most of the posts on these pages done by people who like the site and not necessarily by the site owner? If so, it's possible that the comments might have been posted by someone else, not the AATTP itself (and a number of sites have a "no censorship" policy so they don't take down political comments with which they may disagree).

If I use the same logic you use, aren't the I Hate the Tea Party people just as liable as you hold the Tea Party for the hateful jerks that post bigoted epithets on their facebook page? It goes both ways, there SSS. And while you're on their facebook page, why not take a look take a look at some of the wonderful people the I Hate The Tea party attracts. I'll bet some of them have gotten elected to congress.

If I knew how to do it, I would post a picture of their facebook page. But every time I go there, my computer feels slimy. It creeps me out going there. I can just feel the hatred.

I can't find a group called "I Hate the Tea Party" on Facebook. I did find these however:

https://www.facebook.com/TeaPartyIsAHateGRoup

https://www.facebook.com/NoTeaParty

flockofseagulls104 wrote: And while you're on their facebook page, why not take a look take a look at some of the wonderful people the I Hate The Tea party attracts. I'll bet some of them have gotten elected to congress.

Funny you should say that, because it seems that a whole bunch of people that the Tea Party does support, like Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock and Christine O'Donnell and Sharron Angle do wind up, with Tea Party support, getting the Reupblican nomination for Senate seats and then alienating enough of the general public to lose election after election.

Is it racist to call Sen. Tim Scott R-SC an Uncle Tom?