Car Talk Puzzler: A...Question about a Ship and Its Boiler

The forum for general posting. Come join the madness. :)
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
MarleysGh0st
Posts: 27966
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:55 am
Location: Elsewhere

Car Talk Puzzler: A...Question about a Ship and Its Boiler

#1 Post by MarleysGh0st » Tue Mar 25, 2008 1:20 pm

Car Talk has asked another mathematical question for this week's puzzler. Another $26 gift certificate is up for grabs for one person out of all those to send in the right answer!
An Age-Old Question about a Ship and Its Boiler

RAY: This is from my shipping series and it was sent in by Fred Gluck. He writes: "Back in the old days ships of yesteryear were driven by steam and it was often the case that the ship would outlive the engine and the boiler and they'd have to replace them.

"Now, take one ship for example. When you add the age of the ship and the age of its boiler, it totals 42 years. So S + B = 42. Now pay attention! The ship is twice as old as the boiler was when the ship was as old as the boiler is now."

The question is how old are they?

Answers can be sent to Car Talk using this link:
http://www.cartalk.com/ct/3500.jsp

For me, the hardest part was properly composing the second equation to solve for. Good luck, everyone! 8)

User avatar
Bob Juch
Posts: 27070
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
Contact:

#2 Post by Bob Juch » Tue Mar 25, 2008 1:44 pm

Spoiler
The ship is 24 and the boiler is 18.
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)

Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.

Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.

User avatar
Jeemie
Posts: 7303
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:35 pm
Location: City of Champions Once More (Well, in spirit)!!!!

I did it with...

#3 Post by Jeemie » Tue Mar 25, 2008 3:05 pm

Spoiler
...three equations. It's been a while since I did this stuff, so I'm guessing I missed something where I could have gotten it in two equations.

Anyhow:

Ship Age = S, Boiler Age = B, Years ago that Ship's Age was Boiler Age today = Y

The equations:

B = 42 - S

Y = 2S - 42

S = 2B - 2Y

Substituting through in sequence, you get

S = 24

B = 18

Y = 6 (years ago that the ship's age was the boiler's age today)
1979 City of Champions 2009

User avatar
Jeemie
Posts: 7303
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:35 pm
Location: City of Champions Once More (Well, in spirit)!!!!

#4 Post by Jeemie » Tue Mar 25, 2008 3:10 pm

Spoiler
Actually, while I was writing it all out, I figured out how to get to two equations!

Years ago ship's age was boiler's age now = S - B

So, we have B= 42 - S and

S = 2 * (B - (S - B)) or S = 2 (2B - S) or S = 4B - 2S or

S = (4B)/3
1979 City of Champions 2009

User avatar
MarleysGh0st
Posts: 27966
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:55 am
Location: Elsewhere

#5 Post by MarleysGh0st » Wed Mar 26, 2008 12:16 pm

Jeemie wrote:
Spoiler
...three equations. It's been a while since I did this stuff, so I'm guessing I missed something where I could have gotten it in two equations.

Anyhow:

Ship Age = S, Boiler Age = B, Years ago that Ship's Age was Boiler Age today = Y

The equations:

B = 42 - S

Y = 2S - 42

S = 2B - 2Y

Substituting through in sequence, you get

S = 24

B = 18

Y = 6 (years ago that the ship's age was the boiler's age today)

Actually, while I was writing it all out, I figured out how to get to two equations!

Years ago ship's age was boiler's age now = S - B

So, we have B= 42 - S and

S = 2 * (B - (S - B)) or S = 2 (2B - S) or S = 4B - 2S or

S = (4B)/3
Spoiler
Funny that you should mention that about two equations! That's the approach I took, althought I called it X, the "difference in ages between S and B" instead of Y, the "'Years ago that Ship's Age was Boiler Age today" and plugged that into that longer equation you have. Same thing.

Then I started wondering about the old rule that you need one more equation than independent variables, so two variables need three equations. Where was my third equation??? I figured it must have been rolled into that big one without my noticing somehow.

And it's still not clear to me that Y = 2S - 42 is one of the three equations. Where did you get that, without starting with Y = S - B and then plugging in the first equation for B?

User avatar
MarleysGh0st
Posts: 27966
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:55 am
Location: Elsewhere

#6 Post by MarleysGh0st » Wed Mar 26, 2008 12:20 pm

Spoiler
And I'm completely wrong about that, aren't I?

Two unknowns require two equations.

Duh.

User avatar
Jeemie
Posts: 7303
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:35 pm
Location: City of Champions Once More (Well, in spirit)!!!!

#7 Post by Jeemie » Wed Mar 26, 2008 12:35 pm

Spoiler
MarleysGh0st wrote:Funny that you should mention that about two equations! That's the approach I took, althought I called it X, the "difference in ages between S and B" instead of Y, the "'Years ago that Ship's Age was Boiler Age today" and plugged that into that longer equation you have. Same thing.

Then I started wondering about the old rule that you need one more equation than independent variables, so two variables need three equations. Where was my third equation??? I figured it must have been rolled into that big one without my noticing somehow.

And it's still not clear to me that Y = 2S - 42 is one of the three equations. Where did you get that, without starting with Y = S - B and then plugging in the first equation for B?
Y= 2S - 42 comes from

S - Y = 42 - S (42 - S is the current age of the boiler, so Y years ago, the ship was the current age of the boiler).

All becomes simpler when you just remember that Y = S - B. Then you don't have to have three equations, just two: S+B=42 and S=2*(B-(S-B)) (the second equation comes from the fact that the age of the ship now is twice the age the boiler was when the ship was the current age of the boiler! Whew! try saying that 10 times fast!)
MarleysGh0st wrote:And I'm completely wrong about that, aren't I?

Two unknowns require two equations.

Duh.
Yes- if you have n unknowns, you only need n equations to solve for all the unknowns.
1979 City of Champions 2009

Post Reply