Page 1 of 1
You don't know? Jack
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 12:56 pm
by themanintheseersuckersuit
thats Ms. Jack,
See if you can find the understandable error in this story. (at least I think its an error)
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,337531,00.html
"Mireles claims his ex-wife knew he was a man."
Should be "Mireles claims his ex-wife knew he was a woman"
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 1:17 pm
by Appa23
They must have already caught the error.
However this does seem to be an error:
A judge will allow a woman to annul her marriage when she discovered after her divorce that her ex-husband was once a woman. The "ex-husband" still is a woman. (The article said that she still physically is a woman.
I also am wondering about this custody battle. I am guessing that Ms/Mr. Mirales must have adopted the kids, although it is not mentioned, but she otherwise would not have any claim to the kids. (With the second, despite being born into a "marriage", Ms. Jack can demonstrate that Ms. Mirales is not the father. ) In addition, although I do not know that jurisdiction's laws, there would be no custody battle in Nebraska. The adoption would have been fraudulently obtained by Mirales swearing that she is a male and husband to Ms. Jack.