Page 1 of 1

EARENDEL - RE: LS

Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 5:39 am
by fantine33
Spoiler
Although I think maybe you just answered too fast without thinking about it and I don't remember there being any problem the first go around, I've added a clarification just in case there is any confusion.

So you get a mulligan! But please add a new reply rather than editing your previous one and just amend the ones you answered, if you know the parody title. And, obviously, if you have already looked up answers to those you didn't know, pass those by.

Also a hint: I know you've been having trouble figuring out a good way to do your response. I find it easiest to just quote the whole post, replace the "quote" with "spoiler" in the tags and then just insert my answers in bold. Less html to type that way!

Re: EARENDEL - RE: LS

Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 5:44 am
by earendel
fantine33 wrote:
Spoiler
Although I think maybe you just answered too fast without thinking about it and I don't remember there being any problem the first go around, I've added a clarification just in case there is any confusion.

So you get a mulligan! But please add a new reply rather than editing your previous one and just amend the ones you answered, if you know the parody title. And, obviously, if you have already looked up answers to those you didn't know, pass those by.

Also a hint: I know you've been having trouble figuring out a good way to do your response. I find it easiest to just quote the whole post, replace the "quote" with "spoiler" in the tags and then just insert my answers in bold. Less html to type that way!
I've got to learn to slow down - I was so excited when I saw the songs that I raced through the answers.

Turns out that I read this message too quickly, also, because I went back and edited the answers I'd already posted. I hope that's OK. I didn't bother to look up the ones I didn't already know.