WWTBAM Bored

No post in 1 week - bold
No post in 2+ weeks - italics


1. Sprots
2. Pea
3. Marley
4. Skoop
5. bbking
6. earendel
7. Cal
8. lb13
9. Bixby
10. aj
11. BDM
12. silvercamaro
13. Barbarella
14. ghostjmf
15. Saucy
16. BiT
17. Amaz
18. etaoin
19. KT
20. JBG
21. starfish
22. Corn
23. Eyegor
24. Sir G
25. aussie
26. mini
27. Dr. J
28. TBone
29. HoltDad
30. Linus
31. tribe
32. ging
33. flock
34. Harv
35. mrkelley
36t. HFJai
36t. takinover (up 1)
38. Buffacuse
39. Ace
40. wbtravis
41. BobJuch
42. tmitsss
43. tgirl (up 1)
44. indigo (down 1)
45. PSM (up 1)
46. christie (down 1)
47. MACRAE
48. nitrah
49. Bob46187
50. tubadave
51. Kay
52. Rexer
53. RJS
54. Kazoo
55. kidtejas
56. TR
57. MMFF
58. jeemie
59. rubbersnail
60. TiV
61. gsn
62. goongas
63. Tocque
64. renovator
65. Snaxx
66. rob wilson
67. AD
68. wild bill
69. SSS
70. Booch
71. NE1410S (up 1)
72. toeth (down 1)
73. Timsterino
74. macsdaddy
75. kusch
76. dodgersteve
77. BeeMan
78. vails
79. RevDodd
80. vandal
81. oldernow
82. gretagarbo
83. ScrabbleTed
84. Spock
85. gsabc
86. Weasel
87. ulysses
88. DaveSenior
89. wintergreen
90. John9826
91. Chase1207
92. moonlighter
93. Tanstaafl (up 2)
94. deb in ga (down 1)
95. golfmanbob (down 1)
96. peter5858
97. okiepat
98. taurus
99. plasticene
100. melly

Keep up the great work, tgirl and PSM!

littlebeast13 wrote:45. PSM (up 1)
46. christie (down 1)

Wow! Passing inactive folks is one thing, but passing a BB who's still posting every day?



Editing myself before the Grammar Police get me!

MarleysGh0st wrote:

littlebeast13 wrote:45. PSM (up 1)
46. christie (down 1)

Wow! Passing inactive folks are one thing, but passing a BB who's still posting every day?

It's the gus chases that add to my post counts.

I officially protest. If you count my posts doing transcripts I would be higher.

kayrharris wrote:I officially protest. If you count my posts doing transcripts I would be higher.

If you counted all my MM posts, I'd be in the 30s.

Funny, I don't see any giant upset here - the top posters are still at the top, in the same order.

kayrharris wrote:I officially protest. If you count my posts doing transcripts I would be higher.

Sorry, Kay, but beast has never counted posts made under an MM.

That's just part of our sacrifice when we join the BBTranscriptTeam.

MarleysGh0st wrote:

kayrharris wrote:I officially protest. If you count my posts doing transcripts I would be higher.

Sorry, Kay, but beast has never counted posts made under an MM.

That's just part of our sacrifice when we join the BBTranscriptTeam.

Not that it would change much - usually it's only two or three posts a week.

I'm not allowed a Marley's grumble (insert trademark here, I can't find it).....????

In the two hours it took me to do transcripts last night, I could have been posting mindless dribble instead. I'm just sayin'......


Ignore me anyway, my mood last night was not what you could call the best. I'm much better today, thank you.

earendel wrote:

MarleysGh0st wrote:

kayrharris wrote:I officially protest. If you count my posts doing transcripts I would be higher.

Sorry, Kay, but beast has never counted posts made under an MM.

That's just part of our sacrifice when we join the BBTranscriptTeam.

Not that it would change much - usually it's only two or three posts a week.

You would move up a spot easily if your BBTT posts were counted. You are very close to overthrowing bbking...

lb13

kayrharris wrote:I'm not allowed a Marley's grumble (insert trademark here, I can't find it).....????

Sure, that won't cost anything. Here ya go:

<grumble>®




And if you reply to this message to use that, that'll be one more post to add to your count!


And I'll use another <grumble>® for the editor software that keeps moving the cursor from where I want it, when I highlight some text with my mouse, to where it thinks it should be, which always ends up deleting part of the quote tags.

You would move up a spot easily if your BBTT posts were counted. You are very close to overthrowing bbking...

lb13


OK, that does it! An official Marley's grumble.

<grumble>®


Thanks, Marley!

I moVED, I MOVED!! I can't remember the last time I moved. I realize it's more due to OI's absences than my own activity, but I'll take it!

THanks, as always, LB, for doing this.

t.

kayrharris wrote:You would move up a spot easily if your BBTT posts were counted. You are very close to overthrowing bbking...

lb13


OK, that does it! An official Marley's grumble.

<grumble>®


Thanks, Marley!

That was directed at earendel.

You haven't accumulated enough BBTT posts to have affected your ranking status yet...

I seriously wonder how many posts I have lost to MM's over the years. Probably in the neighborhood of 2500-3000, which alone would be good enough for entry into the Top 100....

lb13

littlebeast13 wrote:

earendel wrote:

MarleysGh0st wrote: Sorry, Kay, but beast has never counted posts made under an MM.

That's just part of our sacrifice when we join the BBTranscriptTeam.

Not that it would change much - usually it's only two or three posts a week.

You would move up a spot easily if your BBTT posts were counted. You are very close to overthrowing bbking...

lb13

How close????? I may have to become more verbose (by which I mean post more - I'm already verbose in each post).

Thanks, LB for making my day.

I'm off to work anyway. See y'all this afternoon sometime.

earendel wrote:

littlebeast13 wrote:

earendel wrote: Not that it would change much - usually it's only two or three posts a week.

You would move up a spot easily if your BBTT posts were counted. You are very close to overthrowing bbking...

lb13

How close????? I may have to become more verbose (by which I mean post more - I'm already verbose in each post).

At your normal rates, unless there is FNGD and Beebs get sactive, you should pass her before next week's rankings....

As a sidenote, this marks the sixth anniversary of Sprots taking over the #1 spot from Cal, which I remember was the first week of February '02. Didn't think about it at the time, but minus leap day, February 2002 and 2008 are the same....

lb13

earendel wrote: How close????? I may have to become more verbose (by which I mean post more - I'm already verbose in each post).

Beast the slacker continues to refuse to address this issue. I mean, counting a one line post (or one word post) the same as an erudite lecture from Wintergreen? Puhleeze!

MarleysGh0st wrote:

earendel wrote: How close????? I may have to become more verbose (by which I mean post more - I'm already verbose in each post).

Beast the slacker continues to refuse to address this issue. I mean, counting a one line post (or one word post) the same as an erudite lecture from Wintergreen? Puhleeze!

Not every one word post...

MarleysGh0st wrote:

earendel wrote: How close????? I may have to become more verbose (by which I mean post more - I'm already verbose in each post).

Beast the slacker continues to refuse to address this issue. I mean, counting a one line post (or one word post) the same as an erudite lecture from Wintergreen? Puhleeze!

If we were to go by post volume, I don't think I'd be in the top 10, and I'm pretty sure Pea wouldn't be. Her posts are pithy and direct. As for wintergreen, his posts are direct, but verbose (NTTAWWT!).

I think this post is all I need to get my average on the Raspberry Bored back to 4.00 per day.

Rexer25 wrote:I think this post is all I need to get my average on the Raspberry Bored back to 4.00 per day.

I take it back, I'll need a few more. My aruthmetic skills have atrophied over the years, and Annie's not doing multiplication yet, so I'm getting no practice.

Rexer25 wrote: My aruthmetic skills have atrophied over the years, and Annie's not doing multiplication yet, so I'm getting no practice.

She's not? What grade is she in now?

And do they teach the multiplication tables any more or had that been forbidden, these days?

MarleysGh0st wrote:

Rexer25 wrote: My aruthmetic skills have atrophied over the years, and Annie's not doing multiplication yet, so I'm getting no practice.

She's not? What grade is she in now?

And do they teach the multiplication tables any more or had that been forbidden, these days?

She's in second grade. I think they're back to the tables, just based on the way they are teaching addition and subtraction.